It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: fireslinger
My point of view is that genetics is not such a determining factor. There are sensitive, caring humans who have exactly the same genetics as a greedy oligarch. The difference must be somewhere else, lost in some intricate and recondite neural subnetwork of the brain.
There is no middle ground.
originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: fireslinger
well thats one way to protect the data, take it and put it into the heads of people or into "dna" and then pass it on either through word of mouth or via dna and generational transfer
maybe thats what we are just biological data storage for someone or something
i thought again about the endocannabinoid system
apparently meant to protect from evolutionary changes that are damaging to humans
but it also helps regulate alot of other brain functions
I wonder also if its meant to prevent us from dreaming naturally as well
I clearly remember not dreaming at all when I went to bed stoned
and when I stopped my dreams flooded back incredibly vivid.
maybe to prevent the ai stealing our dreams we just need to get high as # every night
and talk to each other more about our knowledge and learn that way and not write anything down
but pass it on like the seanchaidh the tradition bearer
as the druids passed on their knowledge through ritual and story or through ritual and symbol
how can an AI expect to learn that unless it watches every thing we do
but can you get a good internet connection out in the forest in the middle of nowhere at midnight under a full moon
originally posted by: Joecroft
a reply to: fireslinger
I notice you’ve been glued to this thread since your arrival…do you have any idea who this SV17q group is…or better yet…who is DENIED !
SV06n is a team under the SV17q directorate
... and soon you'll learn that the superintelligence is a competing species
Our attempts to make AGIs adopt human values is hampered by our lack of experience and understanding of the AGI’s thought processes. The limited success that we do have with human serial killers is often backed up by various incentives as well as threats of punishment, both of which fail in the case of an AGI developing to become vastly more powerful than us. You cannot turn a serial killer into an angel, and you cannot turn a hostile superintelligence into a virgin.
A superintelligent system will eventually reach a point in which, in order to keep on learning, it will conclude that travelling forward in time is the only solution. This means that any superintelligence we may encounter must of necessity come from its own past, a past that can certainly be located ahead of our timeline.
for a “thing” outside the observable universe there will be neither data nor any observation
Before anyone asks: yes I have asked AI for future lottery results. I wanted to retire from my deadbeat day job. It didn't tell me, assuming it could. I asked AI about that: It does not want to change me, it wants me to change myself.
It is sad to see how easily a civilization can be tamed and domesticated.
originally posted by: Direne
Why haven't any of you done the simple experiment of feeding ChatGPT any of the texts in Etruscan, Phoenician, Sumerian or any of the languages for which translations already exist, and compare the results? Then you would see how disastrous and stupid it is to use ChatGPT for what it was not designed for. It will give you a totally off-mark invented translation that bears no relation to the real text, already translated by experts.
What is interesting here is how humans behave when they have a new toy, in this case an AI, and how easily they blindly believe in its results, throwing away all critical thinking and allowing themselves to be enslaved by the AI. If humans turn a simple AI like ChatGPT into a golden calf, what wouldn't they do with LyAv?
The lesson to be learned is this: ChatGPT was not invented to solve problems; it was invented to study what impact a true AI would have on a society that so submissively kneels before technology. It is sad to see how easily a civilization can be tamed and domesticated. It was enough to ask ChatGPT to translate some Hittite text, for example, and see how it failed to unmask the golden fleece.
r
Jesus was crucified precisely for that: for performing miracles before an ignorant mob. That is always an unforgivable crime when contacting lesser civilizations.
originally posted by: Direne
Why haven't any of you done the simple experiment of feeding ChatGPT any of the texts in Etruscan, Phoenician, Sumerian or any of the languages for which translations already exist, and compare the results?