It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NarcolepticBuddha
Originally posted by CrimsonKapital
reply to post by NarcolepticBuddha
S @ F
I thank god have never had any "visitations" from alien beings, but sometimes I have wondered whether I have. I have however had experiences with ghosts, and have seen ufos before.
CKedit on 14-7-2012 by CrimsonKapital because: (no reason given)
As far as I know, neither have I! As I said, the images were so brief and fleeting that it's difficult to be sure exactly what they were and what they were doing.
I have never had experiences with ghosts or UFOs. And I've always wanted to see a UFO in the night sky, that's for sure!
I do not claim to be an ET abductee, I've been attaching this to nearly every one of my replies. Truth is, I don't know what was going on, if anything. I am not convinced that it was a mental disturbance as many would love to tell me though.
edit on 14-7-2012 by NarcolepticBuddha because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ezekielken
reply to post by NarcolepticBuddha
hey buddha. for a week straight I woke up at exactly 4:44 am. by the end of that week I didnt even need to look at the clock to know it was 4:44. Whaat it all means, have no idea
Originally posted by Milkflavour
reply to post by NarcolepticBuddha
Hmm... I'm not sure I can agree that science has anything to do with spirituality. The issue is, as you rightly point out, subjective experiences cannot easily be varified (although, in the case of something like lucid dreaming they were able to varify the subjective reports using scientific observation). It ends up coming down to a matter of belief "I believe there is something otherworldly occurring" or "I believe that this is scientifically explainable, we just don't have the tools or all the info yet". Neither of these viewpoints is more valid than the other, they cancel each other out so to speak, and se we are left with "what do we actually know (or have a weight of evidence for) and does this adequately explain a good proportion of the phenomena we are observing". This is the essence of science, it seeks to disprove itself at all times, in order to further advance our understanding, it seeks new and improved theories that incorporate more of the aspects that remain unexplained by our current understanding. The essence of spirituality is based on belief and subjective experience and it seeks to confirm itself through seeking experiences that reinforce or corroborate the beliefs held. That is the fundamental difference between science and spirituality.
That said, there are surely many incredible things (given the size and complexity of the universe i would say the majority of things) that are yet to be learned and discovered. Who knows, I for one can't wait to find out...
Originally posted by NarcolepticBuddha
reply to post by IAmD1
I couldn't have said it better myself..that's why I'm glad you said it so well. People like to divide spirituality and science..because they just sound so icky together.
Some say science is based on data and that spirituality is based on beliefs. Okay, that's accurate and fair. But we must remember that spirituality is the realm of one's consciousness and that science is in the realm of our physical environment.
When we're dealing with subjective experiences, we must use observational data. Keep a journal. Log your experiences. Describe them. In the chemistry lab, we do the same thing when observing reactions, don't we?