It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
The "icebeg theory" is no more provable either and lets not sail away and forget all about the wealthy industrialists who opposed the implementation of the federal reserve system and who were eliminated when the titanic went down into the abyss,taking away with it forever,1,503 lives...
The 100th anniversary of the titanics sinking is only a few months away...What a time to remove the purposefully installed blinders that were placed in front of our eyes and open our minds enough to try and reveal the Truth about what really happened to this doomed ship and all those innocent people...edit on 28-12-2011 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xuenchen
Here we have two videos.
The Jesuits did it.
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
Originally posted by xuenchen
Here we have two videos.
The Jesuits did it.
[SNIP]
[SNIP]
I can bring similar proof that my cat did it. Ludicrous.
I can bring similar proof that my cat did it.
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by blocula
That's why the sub surfaced.
To rescue agents who may have exited prior to the attack.
And to re-supply from their aid ship after the sinking was underway, The Californian.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
That's a very possible and good theory OP.
Now, not knowing war history (as I have chosen to do because honestly, I can't accept it therefore I can't compute it) why was Germany pissed off at USA?
Second question would be: Why would a supposed foe care whether if their target was civilian or military? I think I know what the answer is but when I hear it, it sounds like one gigantic Milton Bradley world-war game where there are 'rules' on the box cover.
If someone is mad at you and/or they want something from you, they're not going to care about consequences, right?
So if Germany was mad at us (although Hitler and Bush were allies) then what do they care whether they blew up VIPs on a cruise ship or a sorority house sleep over? Their ultimate message would be delivered, heard and reacted to no matter what, right! I just don't understand the 'rules' I guess.
Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by xuenchen
This ship was allowed to set sail with only 20 lifeboats.If i was about to go onboard the titanic and i knew that sad fact,or someone told me that,or i had counted that many myself,i would have never set foot on the ship.A lot of the people that did get on board,must have been mesmerized by the ships supposed indestructibility,or unsinkability.Just blindly believed what the big shots and newpaper tycoons told them like good little sheeple being led to their slaughter ...Hmmmm?
It was designed and allowed to set sail woefully incapable of handling any real emergency and was actually a hyped up death trap would be more like it,more closer to the truth...
They didnt even know then and we still dont know now and at this point we never will know how many people were onboard the titanic...
There are various figures quoted for the number of people onboard the titanic at the time of its sinking.Some sources quote 2,223 people while others cite 2,228. This is due to discrepancies,errors and omissions in the original passenger lists.The official number varies according to the source.It was in the range of 2,200,but a difinitive answer has not been determined and never will.It has often been quoted at 1,250 and even 2,500...What is up with that?!?!
German saboteurs and german secret agents sent onboard to start hyping up the iceberg story right after the torpedo struck in return for large amounts of cash if they were able to survive certainly would have lured a few brave individuals,that imo must be why the total number of people on the ship varies so much and was not and still is not accurately known and now never will...edit on 29-12-2011 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xuenchen
Don't forget either....
pre-ww1 was a staging for establishing Zionist Israel.
ww1 itself was the setup itself and continuing land grabs.
Land titles were being partitioned already, and new nations were being "thought of".
The Rothschilds with the help of Britain and France and the Ottomans were purchasing land in old "Palestine".
(started late 1800's)
And they had already set the targets for the U.S. Federal Reserve.
I think there were more deaths from typhus than combat in ww1.
edit on Dec-29-2011 by xuenchen because: (no reason given)
The Californian was a British ship, owned by a British company, with a British crew. She set off from Liverpool. There has never been any suggestion of any sort that she had anything at all to do with a U-boat and believe me the crew would have talked. Hell, one man, donkeyman Ernest Gill (yes, that's an actual title), talked after the sinkiing that he had seen rockets to the south on the night that the Titanic had sunk. He would surely have noticed a German U-boat next to the ship!
Secondly there is no record of the Californian picking anyone up at all, none of the lifeboats from the Titanic got anywhere near her and the water was so cold that most of the people in the water died in just 20 minutes. When dawn came Californian moved westwards through the icefield (hmmmm, I wonder if there was an iceberg in the region therefore?) and then south. She searched for but found no survivors.
I have a degree in history and the subject of the Titanic is a favourite of mine. The entire idea is patently silly and flies in the face of every single fact we have about the sinking. There were two investigations into the sinking, one run by the US Senate and the other by the British Board of Trade. They both came to the same conclusion: an iceberg did it.