It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Iran is on the verge of getting the Bomb. It is time for President Barack Obama to act

page: 16
142
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 01:43 AM
link   
reply to post by RSF77
 


No Muslims in Pakistan?
Also most likely Saudi Arabia.

Oh and it's always a possibility that some of the former soviet nations that are majority Muslim have them left over even though they were supposed to surrender them to Russia (Kasakhstan for example).

Not that all Muslims or Muslim nations are a concern. I was just pointing out that your statement was incorrect.
edit on 5-11-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 01:43 AM
link   
reply to post by Cosmic4life
 


well israel does not threaten to destroy countries or wipe them of the face of the earth.

And israel puts state before religion unlike islamic regime iran and their crazy clerics...



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 01:46 AM
link   
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR
 


So, who cares?

We can intercept them and as far as I'm concerned a prime directive of the United States military should be to neutralize all nuclear attacks, which (as far as I know) to some extent they have done.

Nobody can # with the United States military, we have that responsibility. Now man up and use it to promote global human progress. People call the United States the "world police", so act like it. Nobody in the US wants to have a war with Iran or Al whateverthe#, I'm sick of all this bickering. We want stuff to do, we want jobs, we want to step forth into the future.

What the hell is wrong with people that they don't understand the basic concept of human progression?
edit on 5-11-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 01:48 AM
link   
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR
 


Pakistan was giving the money we were aiding their military with to the Taliban we were fighting. We are supposed to trust them not to slip a nuke to some radicals? Also, they are thought to have a secret nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia.

Plus, I'm sure it wouldn't be hard for a country to buy one from North Korea.



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 01:50 AM
link   
reply to post by CountDrac
 


Well.. excepting this week. Right?



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 01:52 AM
link   
reply to post by RSF77
 


We shouldn't be the world police. That's not a good thing. We should mind our own business (ironic that you support Ron Paul, but promote the idea of us as world police). We aren't invincible dude. It's not likely they could launch one on us, but it would not be hard to smuggle one in from Mexico.
edit on 5-11-2011 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 01:54 AM
link   
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
 


Mexico needs the US in about the same way China does, because we buy up everything. Why would they support nuking their profit?

Everyone is making a buck off me and you, instead of actually producing something for humanity. Now this is why I'm angry all the time.
edit on 5-11-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 01:55 AM
link   
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
 


The state of the Pakistan nuclear security is scary to say the least. Militants were able to capture a major Pakistani naval base, which they held for close to 18 hours.

Pakistan transports their nukes vehicles that arent designed for security. Those vehicles are lighty armored / not armed and there is very little security assigned to transport those nukes.

A country that produces nuclear weapons in terms of quantity, at least to me, gives the appearence of those nukes being a deterent. A country who wants to obtain only a few nuclear weapons tells me they are more concerned with the highest bidder or are committing to a plan that cannot be stopped once its started.



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 02:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


Well then, its either a question of delivery systems or how much you want to Nazi your citizens in order to make sure no nukes get through.

As far as defense (and the dept of) is concerned.
edit on 5-11-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 02:51 AM
link   
reply to post by RSF77
 


Huh?
You realize I wasn't talking about Mexico doing it right?
I'm talking one of the many gangs that will do anything for money that are pro at getting things across the border.
Or just terrorists getting it across the weak border by themselves..

XCathandra:

Yeah, Pakistan's nukes are far from secure, and I have more concern about their nukes than I do Iran's. It's not just how negligent and unsecured they are. They are just rife with corruption too. Plus there have to be officials over there that are corrupt and hate that we are attacking in their country. They could just turn a blind eye.



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 03:09 AM
link   
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
 


No more rife with corruption than our own are.

I really don't think any wants to dirty bomb the US, considering the crap it would bring for many nations. It can't possibly be in anyone's interest to provoke the superpower that is salivating at taking over the world. Can I even call the US a "superpower" on ATS anymore or will I get flamed?

If something happens to the US, or hell the world for that matter, anymore it is probably our doing. We should probably concentrate on taking our country back before they get too stupid. That's all we need right now, justification to take the world by force.

I think people need to stand up and protest any war the US wants to get into right now.
edit on 5-11-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 03:13 AM
link   
I think everyone here would agree that North Korean recent aggressive actions is by far the most serious threat to world with nukes at their disposal ready to fly. Kim will run out of conventional attention getters soon, and that of course leaves the North Korean nuclear weapons. Who knows what Kim will try next week ?

This OP article has to many inconsistencies to be take seriously at this time.


edit on 5-11-2011 by SJE98 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 03:15 AM
link   
reply to post by SJE98
 


Oh yea sure, N Korea and their dip# missiles. This is what I'm talking about.

Any country with a hand grenade will be portrayed as a threat by CNN and Fox News.
edit on 5-11-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 03:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
 


How about this analogy then;

Take a dog and treat it like crap for 2000 years, blame it for eating your homework, your shoes whatever let that "dog" harbour that for several generations, ultimately climaxing during the holocaust... Then everyone feels sorry for them. Give them their safe country and let them get a foothold in their own destiny...

Beware the kid that messes with that dog.

... Well crap analogy but you know what I meant.
edit on 5-11-2011 by kykweer because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 03:21 AM
link   
reply to post by RSF77
 


Well yeah, sure they DP # missiles. but they would wreck that region of the world and are a very serious threat to neighboring nations like SK and Japan. when the wind blows from that region it ends up in the USA.



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 03:24 AM
link   
reply to post by SJE98
 


I hate to break it, but now a days SK would annihilate NK.

Along with Australia and probably China, Japan or whatever or none at all.
edit on 5-11-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 03:46 AM
link   
reply to post by RSF77
 


Thats not the point though ( win or loose) NK is loose trigger. its about projection for NK.

this is getting off topic I will stick with the OP article.

As for the OP article Israel is pulling the stings by testing public reaction for support of the action. Yet the article states no concrete basis other than pure speculation.the op article is clearly propaganda in it's rawest form

The OP article picks up where the Iran spy article left off, sort of a succession of events to lead to steer public opinion towards real military action for Iran when none are needed at this time. We only know what the media tells us; and if the media thinks that they can manipulate the public with pure propaganda they are mistaken. being in the Mil for 20+ this is propaganda badly written.
edit on 5-11-2011 by SJE98 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 04:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by RSF77
reply to post by SJE98
 


I hate to break it, but now a days SK would annihilate NK.

Along with Australia and probably China, Japan or whatever or none at all.
edit on 5-11-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)


Exactly, SK is far superior to NK in every way. NK will fight because they have nothing more to lose but SK is waiting for them.



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 04:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by havok
Anyone who thinks that Iran will pose a threat is honestly an idiot.
Pakistan has nukes!
NORTH KOREA has nukes! (they pose a real threat)
Russia had over 30,000 nukes at one time...did we invade them?
Nope...cause they don't have oil reserves?!
Or is it because of some "hidden" reason?



There's no need for a 'hidden' reason why the USA doesn't invade Russia, when an 'open' one exists - and you just listed it. Russia has almost as many nuclear weapons as the USA. That's what the Cold War was about.

The USA has history with Iran, let's remember that. It's not a new thing, it goes back to the Jimmy Carter days, the first Ayatollah and the US embassy hostages.



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 04:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
 


Good, I'll be proud of that title.


Originally posted by DaMod
They fire one nuke and they become the world's largest pane of glass.. You know it, I know it and I'm sure they know it.


Ever heard of suicide bombers? Jihadists don't care if they die in the process, as long as the attack is made for Allah. You are both seriously uneducated about Islam.







 
142
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join