It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

6 Year Old Girl groped by New Orleans TSA.This Has To Stop...

page: 34
178
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 04:44 PM
link   
reply to post by mishigas
 


No only legalized crocks they are completely far from the regular citizen and so much into corporate pockets that they have forgotten who they are supposed to work for.

Is no only obscene but right out a disgrace to the voters in this nation, most of our politicians do not read, write or debate laws they are written for them and all they do is pass them for the right amount of money, with disregard of who they affect and how.

despicable how our nations government are nothing but whores and lobbyist their pimps.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 04:56 PM
link   
reply to post by cut3ypie
 


Yeah and the kid got drug tested too

HELLO



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 05:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by sdocpublishing

Uh, you sure sound like one.


Probably because you a) aren't apart of the conversation I was having and b) you either didn't read the discussion or don't understand it.

Thanks for replying, but if you've got nothing of substance to back yourself up then you are setting yourself up as easily dismissible and slightly petty. Come on bud, at least have something to say, sheesh.

Peace
KJ



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 05:15 PM
link   
I stay away from this thread for awhile because I knew whatever I saw would piss me off...


After watching it, I'm quite certain id have been arrested if I was standing in line witnessing something like that happen. And I don't even want to imagine if that was my child.

I feel soo angry and soo powerless. What are my options?? Bitch online?? Ok... elect new officials?? Not gonna make a single differance. I'm disgusted to belong to a society that accepts this.

What is this country comming to?? To think I actually applied for one of those jobs after 9/11....

For the record.. has any white child ever sabatoged an aircraft?? Any American for that matter?? Racial profiling might not be PC but who are the ones that really want to hurt the US?? I mean besides our elected officials.

I hope the next terrorist attack targets TSA workers and all these damn crooks that are determined to run this country into the ground.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 05:25 PM
link   
In the next 5 years there will be a plot during a school field trip when an man with the mind of a terrorist, puts an explosive device in a thermostat of one of the kids on the field trip. When the man notices that all the kids are ok, the man will bewilder the agent in masking of jokes and laughs as the lil child will have gone through the detector, as well as his book bag and other belongings.
The above is just a little of what I wrote originally .

I went through the right channels to get this info out, this was early last year when I told them this, and over the past 20 plus years ,I have had a helpful hand in a lot of stuff as far as plots and other harmful things that would impact the life of the innocent.

So for me, I’m glad they are during this, it will distort all possibilities of getting anything on board a plane and blowing 100s of passengers up, by the way, the vision was a dirty bomb that was well planed on a rainy day, and the trip was fake.

Ps, to all government agents that watch this site.

Watch the boarders of Mexico, as they will try to form a one time plan to get something in the USA through a drug route. Between Feb16 2012-June 3rd2014.

Ps. To all ats members who have a problem with the safety of humans…never mind!

‘Shaking head left to right in utter discuss’ wondering why humans love tragedy and death to happen, wondering why it’s a problem to save lives? Sad!

Human lives Over complaints.com@immortal527
Which do you choose?
edit on 13-4-2011 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)

edit on 13-4-2011 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 05:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Immortalgemini527
 





Ps. To all ats members who have a problem with the safety of humans…never mind!

‘Shaking head left to right in utter discuss’ wondering why humans love tragedy and death to happen, wondering why it’s a problem to save lives?
Sad.
Human lives Over complaints.
Which do you choose?


Years ago my brother was killed in a head on collision by another driver. Both were totally sober. It was late at night, and my brother was returning home from work. The problem was that part of the road had been closed by the County and only a narrow through way for both drivers, in a hopelessly unlit area. It was a complete disregard for safety by the government that caused my brothers death. Of course, the police deemed it to to be the "fault" of the other driver, but no charges were brought against her, as there shouldn't have been. It was a tragic accident on a road not equipped to handle the traffic that the County decided would be fine traveling on it.

Don't you dare lecture me on government saving lives you smug pretentious poser! I would be more inclined to buy into this argument if it wasn't constantly being used as an excuse to abrogate and derogate the unalienable rights of the people. I do not buy for a single second that you care about anyone other than yourself, and as far as the government goes, it is not about saving lives, it is about aggregation of power.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 05:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Vanna
 


Very well put, I concur!



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by Immortalgemini527
 





Ps. To all ats members who have a problem with the safety of humans…never mind!

‘Shaking head left to right in utter discuss’ wondering why humans love tragedy and death to happen, wondering why it’s a problem to save lives?
Sad.
Human lives Over complaints.
Which do you choose?


Years ago my brother was killed in a head on collision by another driver. Both were totally sober. It was late at night, and my brother was returning home from work. The problem was that part of the road had been closed by the County and only a narrow through way for both drivers, in a hopelessly unlit area. It was a complete disregard for safety by the government that caused my brothers death. Of course, the police deemed it to to be the "fault" of the other driver, but no charges were brought against her, as there shouldn't have been. It was a tragic accident on a road not equipped to handle the traffic that the County decided would be fine traveling on it.

Don't you dare lecture me on government saving lives you smug pretentious poser! I would be more inclined to buy into this argument if it wasn't constantly being used as an excuse to abrogate and derogate the unalienable rights of the people. I do not buy for a single second that you care about anyone other than yourself, and as far as the government goes, it is not about saving lives, it is about aggregation of power.


Have good day ,hope you find peace in the tragedy of your love one.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 05:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by northexpedition
I'm sorry, I don't mean to call anyone out specifically, or troll the thread and not contribute anything, but you have to wonder why so many people suddenly pop up in this thread hardcore supporting the TSA, when I would say the vast, vast majority of people I have talked to about the pat downs/body scanners are against it.

Think about it. Who are these people?


I really want to know how to get a government job / disinformation agent. Surf the net all day, derailing threads / trolling.....I would wake up everyday eager to go to work.

TPTB - SIGN ME UP!
edit on 13-4-2011 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 05:57 PM
link   
reply to post by mishigas
 


NP. GLad it made sense.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:04 PM
link   
this is a sick joke we are all being subjected to. grow up. realize what you are defending! this is satanic social engineering being done on all americans, not just children. it's beyond disgusting. i am absolutely shocked that ANYBODY can justify this. anybody who supports this should be ashamed of themselves. it is absolutely disgusting. some of you people need a reality check. only the scum of the earth could see this sort of behavior as acceptable. stop fooling yourselves. really try and *think* about how horrible this really is, and quit propping up government-sanctioned molestation. i hope those of you that support the TSA don't have children. don't you know how easy it would be for a pedophile to get a job touching children all day? you people.... you people make me sick to my stomach, and i am so angry that just even one person could see this as acceptable.


edit on 13-4-2011 by northexpedition because: removed vulgar language



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
 




reply to post by mishigas




Thou speaketh through thine anus, plebe.




Well, this say's it all, doesn't it? Of course someone arguing against unalienable rights would feel compelled to call others "plebe". It is this elitist attitude right here that separates the righteous from the ignoble.


Ahh, what would one of your posts be without a tidy amount of acrid bullcrap? Can you not accept that someone might discuss the issue without agreeing with the TSA?




You refrain from answering the question because it would entail a modicum of maturity. Why, we ask?..


You mean I refrained from answering a rhetorical question, don't you? If you knew anything about maturity, you wouldn't be demanding a nanny state.


Demanding a nanny state? Rhetorical question?

The 'nanny state' comment was just another of your sophomoric attempts to derail the topic. Your posts are full of them. The question, however, was real: How would you deal with the issue? Regardless of your or my opinion of the TSA, the problem still remains.




It has nothing to do with your 'rights'. It asks the question of whether you can address the very situation that sane people try to avoid. And your 'rights' are not being infringed at all. Just as I must temporarily suspend my 2nd Amendment right when I board an aircraft, then others may have to submit to a search to board.




Of course a petty little tyrant such as yourself would feel compelled to place the word rights in quotation marks. That is, after all, what rights are to you, merely a word that other people use to annoy you. Poor, poor, pitiful mishigas, surrounded by so many "plebes" who believe in freedom. What's a petty little tyrant to do? Why lecture the free on what exactly their rights are, and are not, of course!


The quotes are there to school you on a concept that you have no knowledge of. You cannot just apply them to any situation that finds your desires on a collision course with reality.


This will probably come as a shock to you, sport, but all people everywhere have the right to travel, and every person has the right to contract without government interference.


Not true, as you know. And who said that people have no right to travel, or did you pull that out of the same place that you get most of your ad hominem attacks?


The only excuse for governments to interfere with the travel and contract of an individual and the business they are contracting with is if some form of criminality is involved. Boarding an airplane is not by any stretch of the imagination a criminal act.


You really waste a lot of words creating your straw men, plebe.


It is the height of dis-ingenuousness to claim that the actions of the TSA are actually a business decision made by airlines as opposed to the government intrusion it is.


Now there's a straw man argument for you! Nobody, esp. not me, alluded to that at all. But you emote it as if it were being debated. True plebeian behavior!




Clearly, by your proclivity to call people who disagree with you "plebe" you think people are generally stupid,


Not everyone, plebe, just people like you that attack the person because you cannot answer valid questions put to you.



Again, all people have the right to travel, and they have the right to contract. Do not lecture me on what my rights are, fool. I know full well what my rights are, and I know all too well how many petty tyrants there are out there who despise my rights because people like you believe that the privileged should have more than others.


Once again thou speaketh through thy anus. Again you attempt to evade the questions put to you by spewing bullcrap such as "I know all too well how many petty tyrants there are out there who despise my rights because people like you believe that the privileged should have more than others."


You hate rights because they are universal and belong to all people, and people like you just can't stand that.


Typical Jean Paul Zodeaux. Wounded by logic, he casts another plebian pebble (aka personal attack) as he scurries away from the arrows from his adversary's bow..

I really hate wasting bandwidth responding to your constant barrage of personal attacks. Seriously. But try to accept that there are real issues that demand real solutions from real adults. And they need to be discussed without the distraction of responding to false, contrived accusations from you that, since I acknowledge the problem, I must therefore be an advocate of the TSA pat-down procedures and everything else they and the government do.

Finally, I once again challenge you to answer the questions posed to you, Sans the straw men, ad hominem attacks, and diversions that make up the bulk of your posts please.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:10 PM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 


Maybe your right. Maybe it will never happen. Call me names, say I'm not patriotic, characterize me as part of some conspiracy to take away our rights. But please don't say there aren't people with the desire and motivation to blow up an American plane at any cost.

There are bigger fish to fry in terms of fixing our country than complaining that security for airplanes is too tight.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Immortalgemini527
 





Have good day ,hope you find peace in the tragedy of your love one.


I will find peace through freedom, and deal with the tragedies that come my way as best I can.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:19 PM
link   
I posted this on another of my favorite sites and everybody seems ok with it....

I think its absurd and cannot believe the governments goal of FEAR is actually succeeding.

Terrorist will sneak in bombs on children!!! My ass!!! That girl will feel feal eeverything she sees someone with a badge and thats exactly what they want.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:20 PM
link   
reply to post by mishigas
 


There are already cases in the middle east of women and teenagers wearing bombs. To think that a really determined bad guy wouldn't use a child is naive.

Something I haven't seen in this thread is the mention of what lead to people wearing bombs. Pretty much boils down to people with destroyed lives that want to get even. They can't wage an "official" war like the wealthy countries. Maybe the solution to this whole situation is to stop killing people that our government tells us too. Violence begets violence.

Peace



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
 




Far from being an educated guess, sport, you are just one more sycophant of tyranny excusing the disparagement of rights in the name of fear.


Thou speaketh through thine anus, plebe.

You refrain from answering the question because it would entail a modicum of maturity. Why, we ask?..

It has nothing to do with your 'rights'. It asks the question of whether you can address the very situation that sane people try to avoid. And your 'rights' are not being infringed at all. Just as I must temporarily suspend my 2nd Amendment right when I board an aircraft, then others may have to submit to a search to board.

You have no 'right' to board an airplane. And there are many such temporary "No Right Zones" in our world. But that is part of living in a complex, increasingly dangerous world. And please....no slippery slope arguments or freedom vs security false choices. They do not always reflect reality. And you always have the choice of not flying.

So my question remains: If an arbitrary age limit were imposed, where no child under the age of 12 could be searched, for example...and a rash of mid-air bombings resulted...how would YOU address and handle the situation, Mr. King For a Day?

Don't say my scenario is ridiculous. In the mideast, there are countless instances of youngsters being used as death mules. And please, stop it with the labeling of others as " sycophants of tyranny" just because they disagree with you.

What do we do, Bunky? How do we handle those pesky situations?




Thanks for the reality check. I agree completely.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:29 PM
link   
reply to post by northexpedition
 



ever heard of bohemian grove and the occult obsession with pedophilia? this is probably some sick joke we are all being subjected to. grow up. realize what you are defending! this is sick satanic social engineering being done on all americans, not just children. it's beyond disgusting. i am absolutely shocked that ANYBODY can justify this. i am absolutely ashamed of some of you people.


The problem is, whether you love or hate the TSA, we still have security issues. I have seen nobody justify the actions of the TSA. Most acknowledge the security problems, and acknowledge that something needs to be done. The TSA's actions are not the choice of anybody. But when we ask people like you for alternate solutions, all we get is false accusations of being government agents, lovers of the TSA, shills, and worse. Remember your own words around that; you are as guilty as anyone in that regard.

When, in the future, we are subjected to much stricter methods, it will be the fault of people like you that refused to face the problem in it's infancy. You chose to label your fellow Americans as going along with the perceived enemy instead of trying to find solutions. Shame on you.



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:33 PM
link   
It's simple people..... everything that boards the aircraft must be checked for weapons and drugs... period. Every bag, every box, every item, every person (adult and child) should be checked before they enter the aircraft. That is to prevent problems on the aircraft.

If you are against that... I think maybe you have issues. If you don't want to be checked before getting on an aircraft, then don't fly. Very simple right???

If you think you will be "free" if the TSA just stop searching people, you are highly mistaking. You will be as free as the victims on 9/11.


edit on 13-4-2011 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 06:34 PM
link   
listen, i am so angry right now, i am not even going to bother arguing with anybody who has any problems with anything i am saying. you know why? because i am in the right.

I DON'T NEED PEOPLE TELLING ME AN ADULT TOUCHING A CHILD IS ACCEPTABLE.








 
178
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join