It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mysterious Missile Launch Over California - 11/8/2010

page: 83
354
<< 80  81  82    84  85  86 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


I am not really sure where you are getting at. If you are asking whether your missile video looks like orginal footage to me I would have to say no. However there was a spaceshuttle video some pages back it,and I think it looks very similar to that. With more emphasis on the nose glow of it
edit on 10-11-2010 by Moose318 because: (no reason given)

edit on 10-11-2010 by Moose318 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Getsmart
 


"For those trained to read between the lines in official or diplomatic double talk"

how does one attain such training?



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:19 AM
link   
IMHO the smoke looks too dense to be jet contrail.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:19 AM
link   
IMHO the smoke looks too dense to be jet contrail.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by backinblack
 

I'm saying that it is not indicated as a direct quote from the cameraman.
But even if it was it doesn't matter. There are plenty of people right here who insist it wasn't a jet contrail.


Most here are not "insisting" as you suggest, except maybe you and a few others.
I would have accepted contrail if the information was released 24hours or so ago.
Now it would be tough to accept for sure.
You would have to admit someone is trying to make this a mystery.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:20 AM
link   
I believe it to be a 'secret' launch, and i find it odd the FAA know nothing about it. Pilots/Airlines are always updated with NOTAMS, which will explain why the area where the object was seen was effectively a 'no fly zone' for 5 hours. I believe this cannot be authorized without the FAA's knowledge.

Quote:

A2832/10 - THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS ARE REQUIRED DUE TO NAVAL AIR
WARFARE CENTER WEAPONS DIVISION ACTIVATION OF W537.
IN THE INTEREST OF SAFETY, ALL NON-PARTICIPATING PILOTS
ARE ADVISED TO AVOID W537. IFR TRAFFIC UNDER ATC JURISDICTION
SHOULD ANTICIPATE CLEARANCE AROUND W537 AND CAE 1176.
CAE 1155 WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR OCEANIC TRANSITION.
CAE 1316 & CAE 1318 WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR OCEANIC TRANSITION.
CAE 1177 WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR OCEANIC TRANSITION.
W537 ACTIVE, CAE 1176 CLOSED. SURFACE - FL390, 08 NOV 20:00 2010 UNTIL 09
NOV 01:00 2010. CREATED: 07 NOV 20:52 2010

Plus closure of other coastal blocks of airspace from Surface to Unlimited altitude.

Quote:

11/084 (A2837/10) - AIRSPACE W61 ACT SFC-UNL. 08 NOV 15:30 2010 UNTIL 10 NOV 03:00 2010. CREATED:09 NOV 09:33 2010

11/083 (A2838/10) - AIRSPACE W60 ACT SFC-UNL. 08 NOV 15:30 2010 UNTIL 10 NOV 03:00 2010. CREATED:
08 NOV 09:33 2010

11/082 (A2836/10) - AIRSPACE W290 ACT SFC-UNL. 08 NOV 15:30 2010 UNTIL 09 NOV 03:00 2010. CREATED:
08 NOV 09:33 2010

11/081 (A2835/10) - AIRSPACE W289N ACT SFC-UNL. 08 NOV 15:30 2010 UNTIL 09 NOV 03:00 2010. CREATED:
08 NOV 09:33 2010

11/080 (A2834/10) - AIRSPACE W289 ACT SFC-UNL. 08 NOV 15:30 2010 UNTIL 09 NOV 03:00 2010. CREATED:
08 NOV 09:33 2010
edit on 10-11-2010 by Nathan9197 because: typo's



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:20 AM
link   
Coast to Coast amwith george noory is talking about the this mysterious object now.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Doyle
 


I agree with you doyle, that's why everyone is going nuts here. I have not seen an 80+ page thread this quick here on ATS since at least last weeks doomsday prediction thread!!


But seriously, I think everyone is in agreement here, that the US gov could have stepped on this super quick, but have for soem reason chosen not to!

weird!



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by tommyjo
Hopefully this hasn't been posted yet?

Some excellent Flightaware analysis on the following. See webcam footage of another contrail plume 24 hours after the helicopter footage.

www.bahneman.com...

'Posted by: Liembo | 11/9/10 | 10:22 pm |
My research shows it as AWE808, or UPS902, their altitude (for contrail formation) and position are both pretty close, though I believe 808 is the stronger candidate. I base this one the way AWE808 appeared on the horizon TODAY (Tuesday, Nov. 9) on its same flight path at approximately the same time. I made a screen cap of a Newport Beach webcam with AWE808 making a very familiar contrail to the west.'

From

www.wired.com...

TJ
edit on 10-11-2010 by tommyjo because: (no reason given)





808 is the stronger candidate

Read a few a pages back it wasn't a 808 nor a jet




My research shows it as AWE808, or UPS902,

I love how the plane believers change there plane number to further claim that it were or was a jets or jet.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:22 AM
link   
reply to post by thecinic
 


Can you post a link to a free stream?



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:23 AM
link   
Thanks Jackius I was starting to think this thread had become elitist and tunnel visioned. I think there should at least be some discussion as to why things have been reported on main news networks in this strange way.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Nathan9197
 

The NOTAM was effective starting at 12:00 noon LA time...today. The incident happened yesterday.

Area 537 is north of LA, offshore between Vandenberg and Santa Barbara.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:24 AM
link   
To me this seems like a message.

It had no target. Watching it's trajectory makes this clear... unless of course the target was the upper atmosphere, in which case, it hit it's target, lol.

Think for a moment. If you had a nation and wanted another nation to know you had the ability to screw with it... how would you deliver this message?
Words are meaningless.
Personally, I'd launch an ICBM right off that nations coast with no actual target. Just launch it and let it soar overhead aimlessly.

... seems pretty damned conveniently similar.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:24 AM
link   
Noory link www.540wfla.com...



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:25 AM
link   
Can't remember if that video has been post if so, my apologies.
I think this is the best video showing the missile.

Video

Sorry, don't know how to embeb this video in my post...

That can be a plane but a plane in fire with no wings...
edit on 10-11-2010 by Esger because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter

Read a few a pages back it wasn't a 808 nor a jet



I love how the plane believers change there plane number to further claim that it were or was a jets or jet.



What's an 808?

It was US Air flight number 808. Or the UPS flight, but the UPS flight is more likely.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter

Read a few a pages back it wasn't a 808 nor a jet



I love how the plane believers change there plane number to further claim that it were or was a jets or jet.



What's an 808?

It was US Air flight number 808. Or the UPS flight, but the UPS flight is more likely.


aww
I thought we were set on flight 808! We need to make up our minds here.

edit on 10-11-2010 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:29 AM
link   
I'm sorry guys but as I said earlier, I have seen hundreds of missile tests from L.A. and literally thousands of jet contrails.

Almost all my being says that this does NOT look like any jet contrail I've seen, and it looks IDENTICAL to every missile test I've seen.


Like I said before, when we were kids, missile tests from Los Angeles were a normal part of life. As 10 year olds we knew how to distinguish them. This was at a time in the 80's when these things were weekly.


Could I be wrong? Of course. But I think something funny is going on here and not just an 'optical illusion'.
Again, this is just based on my somewhat 'expertise' on the issue, but I have no empirical proof. My skeptical side says to stick to a rational explanation, but the "rational" explanation to me now is simply.....MISSILE.

Sorry



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Doyle
 


Don't worry it does get like that sometimes, especially when you get 2 or 3 member in a heated discussion. everyone else just scrambles to catch up, and post ad hoc, and some other material gets lots in the pages of BS arguing and tit for tat name calling. and most, especially in a thread this size will not read all pages and I don't blame them as most is just waffle!!



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 12:30 AM
link   
cant believe im saying this but the Mexican cartel could easily be a possibilty, after all it is not impossible just improbable.
Lets stretch it out and say it was Mexican Cartel why would they? well the US has amped up its forces with thm seizing more drug shipments, recently killing another drug lord.

Both arizona and off the coast of california are accesible by Cartel members.

They have boats, and subs.

They definatly have the money to attain such weapons from say NK, Iran China.

These were clearly a msg from someone to someone all im saying is its a remote possibilty.



new topics

top topics



 
354
<< 80  81  82    84  85  86 >>

log in

join