It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
.I keep getting a response: you know I can not talk about that stuff. Sorry. I have tried.
Originally posted by AZWOODCHUCK
A little educated guessing here...
IMHO, it's not a modern ICBM. Plume looks too dark and dirty, speed is relatively slow for a missile.
Something a couple of generations old that could've been procured by someone with a relatively low
budget. My first thoughts were a surface to air missile probably aimed at something departing LAX.
I Haven't been able to access a very good copy of the video, not that it was very good to begin with.
If stage seperation can be determined, than it is probably not anti-aircraft.
Govt.'s lack of knowledge is troubling.
Whatever it was, it wasn't something being launched into orbit. It's clearly traveling to the west (if it really is from Los Angeles), but ALL orbital launches are done towards the east. To do otherwise means giving yourself an extra 2,000 miles per hour, at the equator, to overcome (due to the earth's rotation); it adds an enormous amount of fuel and weight for no reason, not to mention it would mean going the wrong way down a "one-way street" (nothing up there orbits from east to west; that'd be just begging for huge head-on collisions with only a few milliseconds of warning). Wherever it was headed, it was meant to hit the ground or ocean.
They are probably just shooting off the missile to knock the asteroid that is on course to hit us off its current trajectory.
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
My daughter's father works for USAF Space Command/DoD/Norad and this is his job - to monitor all launches all over the world. He watched this launch as it happened and monitored it.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by backinblack
channel6newsonline.com...
www.newscientist.com...
www.msnbc.msn.com...
www.smartplanet.com...
edit on 11/9/2010 by Phage because: (no reason given)