What could this Be?? 911 - Second Strike Footage... Wing Disapears

Originally posted by cluckerspud
ON TOPIC:
Crappy compressed digital file along with lighting anomalies is what you are seeing in the videos presented.

That's your opinion and I respect that but I don't respect the fact that you have expressed it too many times to count, and it seems to infuriate you that others don't agree with you.

Wake up look around you.. not everyone is going to agree with you all the time.

As I have said many times, if you want to debunk the thread... prove that the effect is a lighting anomaly.. so far you have been unable to do this... something that should be easy to do if it is the truth.

Korg.

Originally posted by Korg Trinity

Originally posted by cluckerspud
ON TOPIC:
Crappy compressed digital file along with lighting anomalies is what you are seeing in the videos presented.

That's your opinion and I respect that but I don't respect the fact that you have expressed it too many times to count, and it seems to infuriate you that others don't agree with you.

Wake up look around you.. not everyone is going to agree with you all the time.

As I have said many times, if you want to debunk the thread... prove that the effect is a lighting anomaly.. so far you have been unable to do this... something that should be easy to do if it is the truth.

Korg.

Dude, you've been debunked, get over it. The proof is in the picture and RAW video ffs.

Once again:



And the RAW video is here:

www.megaupload.com...

Originally posted by Korg Trinity
As I have said many times, if you want to debunk the thread... prove that the effect is a lighting anomaly.. so far you have been unable to do this... something that should be easy to do if it is the truth.

Why should I try to debunk. That would be off topic.
Remember, the purpose of this thread is to ask what we think, right?!

ON TOPIC:
Crappy compressed digital file along with lighting anomalies is what you are seeing in the videos presented.

Thanks for asking my thoughts.

reply to post by Korg Trinity


Haha love it! Utter rubbish. Software 20 years ahead of us mere mortals? Proof please. Thanks for the lecture, even though I do this stuff for a living.

S

Originally posted by stucoles
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

Haha love it! Utter rubbish. Software 20 years ahead of us mere mortals? Proof please. Thanks for the lecture, even though I do this stuff for a living.

S

So you think that The Government and military don't have technology 20 years ahead???

Are you kidding??

Are you even a member of ATS????

Do some research. Augmented reality was around back in 2001... and it was only needed for the one live feed anyway, all the other footage could be done pre event and released to order.

Korg.

Originally posted by LifeSux

Dude, you've been debunked, get over it. The proof is in the picture and RAW video ffs.

Once again:

And the RAW video is here:

www.megaupload.com...

edit on 27-10-2010 by LifeSux because: (no reason given)

I find it interesting that this image appears.... where did this appear from exactly?

This is hardly proof - this video could have been altered for all I know, as some say the video in my OP may have been.

I also refer you to the fact that there are multiple cameras and shots from different angles showing the same anomaly. So having an image with a faint wing, which as someone had already said looks too swept back, at the wrong angle...

Frankly to me this looks like someone has revisited the footage upon this thread and added something.

So I call Megafail on your megaupload!

I am downloading and shall do a frame by frame analysis against the frame by fame of the video on my OP... you better hope that the job was done v. well or there maybe some disinfo agents ousted right here on ATS!!

Korg.

Originally posted by Korg Trinity

Originally posted by LifeSux

Dude, you've been debunked, get over it. The proof is in the picture and RAW video ffs.

Once again:

And the RAW video is here:

www.megaupload.com...

edit on 27-10-2010 by LifeSux because: (no reason given)

I find it interesting that this image appears.... where did this appear from exactly?

This is hardly proof - this video could have been altered for all I know, as some say the video in my OP may have been.

I also refer you to the fact that there are multiple cameras and shots from different angles showing the same anomaly. So having an image with a faint wing, which as someone had already said looks too swept back, at the wrong angle...

Frankly to me this looks like someone has revisited the footage upon this thread and added something.

So I call Megafail on your megaupload!

I am downloading and shall do a frame by frame analysis against the frame by fame of the video on my OP... you better hope that the job was done v. well or there maybe some disinfo agents ousted right here on ATS!!

Korg.

edit on 27-10-2010 by Korg Trinity because: Korg is a DUDE

Lmao. Get a life bro.

Originally posted by Korg Trinity
So I call Megafail on your megaupload!

I call crappy fail on your crappy pictures.

ON TOPIC:
Crappy compressed digital file along with lighting anomalies is what you are seeing in the videos presented.

Thanks for asking my thoughts.

Originally posted by cluckerspud

Originally posted by Korg Trinity
So I call Megafail on your megaupload!

I call crappy fail on your crappy pictures.

ON TOPIC:
Crappy compressed digital file along with lighting anomalies is what you are seeing in the videos presented.

Thanks for asking my thoughts.

For goodness sake. will you guys stop breaching the ATS Ts&Cs!!! Haven't you taken notice of a post ban threat earlier for comment such as that???

Originally posted by LifeSux
Lmao. Get a life bro.

Seriously... you contributed nothing with this comment. You neither rebutted nor refuted anything...
A personal attack is the most you have to contribute to the person your reply was aimed at?

The 9/11 threads/forums are fast becoming the place to go if you want to be persecuted for what you happen to think. Last night, I was eager to do some comparison shots, and color samples/comparisons and such on the video in question, along with a couple of stills...

I read a few more threads in the 9/11 forum, and quickly decided against posting anything I might have found.

We all come here to share our ideas and thoughts about whatever topics we want - in this case, September 11th.
Generally, we do so with a decent feeling of safety, and without fear of ridicule and/or reprisal.
Lately, this 9/11 and Alien/UFO forums have become breeding grounds for just the opposite.
People are going to start seriously reconsidering their openness with the community, and are going to just keep to themselves... which, in my opinion, goes against the very concept of ATS.
We're here to post things we find... and if personal attacks and trolling drives contributors away, it's not going to be easy to bring them back.

Contribute something useful, or don't contribute at all.

Originally posted by Korg Trinity
For goodness sake. will you give guys stop breaching the ATS Ts&Cs!!! Haven't you taken notice of a post ban threat earlier for comment such as that???

edit on 27-10-2010 by Korg Trinity because: (no reason given)

I apologize. Sorry. That was rude.

ON TOPIC:
Crappy compressed digital file along with lighting anomalies is what you are seeing in the videos presented.

reply to post by Korg Trinity


The proof baby, the proof? Without it you've have nothing.
You need facts to have a valid argument but thus far we haven't seen any. Especially when refering to the technology issue.

S

Originally posted by ConradsLaces

Originally posted by LifeSux
Lmao. Get a life bro.

Seriously... you contributed nothing with this comment. You neither rebutted nor refuted anything...
A personal attack is the most you have to contribute to the person your reply was aimed at?

The 9/11 threads/forums are fast becoming the place to go if you want to be persecuted for what you happen to think. Last night, I was eager to do some comparison shots, and color samples/comparisons and such on the video in question, along with a couple of stills...

I read a few more threads in the 9/11 forum, and quickly decided against posting anything I might have found.

We all come here to share our ideas and thoughts about whatever topics we want - in this case, September 11th.
Generally, we do so with a decent feeling of safety, and without fear of ridicule and/or reprisal.
Lately, this 9/11 and Alien/UFO forums have become breeding grounds for just the opposite.
People are going to start seriously reconsidering their openness with the community, and are going to just keep to themselves... which, in my opinion, goes against the very concept of ATS.
We're here to post things we find... and if personal attacks and trolling drives contributors away, it's not going to be easy to bring them back.

Contribute something useful, or don't contribute at all.

Yeah, you're right. Everybody has the right to their own opinion. But my opinion of his opinion is that's it's ridiculous. And he may think mine is.

But anyways..there is clearly a wing there and the gash (in pictures and videos) clearly shows that a wing entered.

Btw, where are these other 3 videos that you say have no wing?

Originally posted by boondock-saint
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5544378a7935.jpg[/atsimg]

a sreenshot from Loose Change shows the impact
from 4 different angles and the plane has both wings
in all 4 shots. It is either a flaw in that posted
video or either it was manipulated to look that way.

It may as well be the other way around, I think the loose change footage is manipulated, wings were added..

Originally posted by LifeSux But my opinion of his opinion is that's it's ridiculous. And he may think mine is.

Opinion or not - don't make a personal attack out of it. State your opinion... act with a modicum of decency; add something to the discussion rather than senseless drivel.

Originally posted by stucoles
reply to post by MrAnnunaki

 

I notice that all you have been doing of late is stirring it on many threads. What are your beliefs? Lay it out for all to see. Better still show us something substantial to back it up.

S

u been lurking on my profile ? my beliefs ? what do i need to backup ?

the event we call 911 is so backed up that it was an innside job by so many, but those are the crackpot tinfoil people. only proofs and research you guys got is written by the Gov.

wha

reply to post by Korg Trinity


Answer yes or no ONLY to each question.

1: Is this your footage? \ I.E do you have the raw footage to share via torrent file?

2: Are you viewing this on You tube like the rest of us??

Note to mod...

If answer to question 1: = no = close thread

reply to post by ConradsLaces


Words to post by.

Cheers

Originally posted by mojoharry
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

Answer yes or no ONLY to each question.

1: Is this your footage? \ I.E do you have the raw footage to share via torrent file?

2: Are you viewing this on You tube like the rest of us??

Note to mod...

If answer to question 1: = no = close thread

You're gonna have to define raw footage for OP.
I think he believes that what he provided was considered raw footage.

How many times do the wings, horizontal stabilizers, and vertical stabilizers disappear in this video?

(pause it every second or so.)