What could this Be?? 911 - Second Strike Footage... Wing Disapears

Originally posted by MiMobs
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

To say it is anything other than that is insane and plain delusional!!!

It is not I that have a plane delusion...

You people claiming that plane is actually a CGI missle... IMO need professional help. Maybe just talk to someone and tell them the thoughts you are having. I might be way off base, but I am willing to bet, NOT ONE professional therapist would say that your theory is "healthy"...

Well firstly I take offence at this comment and think you should revisit and apologise.

My theory is what I believe happened, there are many others whom also believe this version of events, and we are not talking about unintelligent people, we are talking physicist, engineers, pilots, even world leaders!

Are you really trying to say that if you don't believe the OS you need professional help??

It really is frightening that there are people that believe the stuff they write, and these same people are driving cars down the same streets I drive my kids to school down. That truly scares me. IMO, anyone that thinks that is a CGI plane, has crossed a sceptical line and merged with delusional!

Not as scary as the people that believe that somebody could have a few weeks training on a crop duster, can then jump in a Boeing 767 and perform better than most pilots of many years to strike accurately to within meters not once but twice....

Not as scary as those that believe that there is nothing odd about the fact that both north and south tower didn't collapse, they were totally disintegrated...

And Certainly not as Scary as people whom are so certain that there is no cover up that they will easily fall for another false flag as and when it happens.....

At this point, after what I have written. I will be accused of and called.
1. Being a dis-info agent
2. Ignoring facts (I use facts very very very lightly)
3. being a sheeple and believing my Govts story (which I clearly denied - OS = BS but..... Plane being CGI bigger BS!!)
4. Insulting - NO WAY - If I see an apple and call it an apple , did I insult that apple? Even if the apple doesn't know its an apple?
5. They require NO proof.. They just throw wacked out theories out there and eventually one of them grows legs and runs through delusional land for a year or so, then gets tired and goes away.
6. If you offer any proof it is scrutinized like it was a vile of aids.

I'll go with possibly one... though defiantly two, three and four.

I have now watched 10 videos showing the plane with 2 wings.... (BECAUSE THAT IS HOW THEY FLY!!!!)

Doesn't change the theory, the theory is that they manipulated the videos to look REAL... but as I said earlier there is no such thing as a perfect crime and there are so many anomalies in the 911 footage that point to something other than the OS going on...

There is 1 video showing the wing disappearing - Truthers and Numbers boy need to prove that their 1 video is right, and the 10 others are fakes.. Now prove it, or admit that your imagination got the best of you.

Nope... there are multiple videos of this phenomenon from different cameras and different angles. Analysis of the footage compared to other footage doesn't add up.

If you don't like the fact that there are people out there that don't believe the OS bull, that's fine.... but why do you feel the need to post here if you have nothing to add other than your opinion, which you have expressed a number of times already??? Unless you are a number one on your list???

Korg.

The number "911" translates to the words:

"Magic Plane One Wing".

and

"Magic Plane On Left Wing".


God has a morbid sence of humor.

The events of 911 were an "Act of GOD" -- magic!!!!

Korg, with all due respect. Your OP should have better outlined "your theory" to help keep this thread form spinning out of control. Your mistake was this:

Originally posted by Korg Trinity
What do you guys make of that???

This vid has me going nuts...

Asking people what they "make of it" allows for all sorts of interpretations.
Why ask us what we make of it when you clearly have the answer?!

You should have outlined your theory in a neat organized fashion.

Why don't you take some time to outline your theory. Explain how this could have pulled off, what was used, who is behind it and all the elements that went in.

I get the feeling that some people are suggesting your theory is based on holograms, when it's not. In fact the details of your theory were not even revealed until page 3 of your own thread.

Jumbled thoughts, vague responses and reactive behavior is no way to convince anyone of your theory.

Lets bring it full circle, and I stand firm on this: You posed the question: What do you guys make of that?

And my answer remains the same: Low quality video, Bad resolution, Video artifacts and a wild imagination. That's what I make of it.

Want to discuss or disagree? Then please do some work and present us with some information and an outline of your theory.

reply to post by Korg Trinity


Ahhhh....I see someone is getting some of their opinions from some of those appalling "9/11 conspiracy" sites, because this is what many of them spew....this LIE:

Not as scary as the people that believe that somebody could have a few weeks training on a crop duster, can then jump in a Boeing 767 and perform better than most pilots of many years to strike accurately to within meters...

The last bit, firstly....it was not "accurate to within meters"...they just aimed, at VERY LARGE targets.

Now to the easily debunked and discredit claims of the a "few weeks training on a crop duster"....

Not only did the ones assigned to each hijacked airplane have COMMERCIAL pilot certificates, they had spent months (years?) practicing. They purchased simulator time, in real full-motion airliner simulators, in various locations around the world.

But, despite all that, I can tell you this: Even if YOU have never flown so much as a Microsoft Flight Sim on a PC desktop, I could show you the basics, just to do what they did, in very little time. I could take you from knowing nothing, sit you down in a classroom (the ones we use, at the airline, with the training materials, photos of the instrument panels, etc) and cover a lot in just a few hours' time of instruction.

THEN, we could either use the non-motion "cockpit procedures trainers" (a re-creation of the cockpit that is interactive on some of the instruments and electronics, to gain familiarity) and in a few hours, if you have ANY aptitude at all (and I assume you do, since you know how to use the computer you're typing and surfing the web on) you could be up to speed very quickly.

Following that, we could then move to the full-motion Level-D simulator, which is about as realistic as current technology can make it. (Its major limitation is it can't re-create the sustained G-forces that you can experience in real flight. BUT, it is programmed to "fool" your inner ear senses to mimic the sorts of other sensations you feel in flight....hence, the "full-motion" description).

Hey, if Ricky Martin can do it....(who, probably, has had a couple of flying lessons, and was likely briefed as I described)....AND, he actually LANDS the simulator!!! (9/11 hijackers did not have to accomplish that more sophisticated and skillful task):



The opening bit, in the background, is an example of those "CPT"-type training aids. (That one we call the "wooden wonder", since it's just some plywood nailed together, with full-size photos of the instrument panels glued to the surfaces...)

I also found this from a (now retired) Delta Captain, an email he sent to someone in 2006, recalling his encounter in July, 2001, with Mohammed Atta. It won't copy/paste, so this is just a link...and you can read the comments by the hosting website, "snopes", which call into question its veracity, since it is as yet unconfirmed. They question based on known travels of Atta, reconstructed from his airline ticket travel and rental car records. HOWEVER, back then when you travelled on the jumpseat (as a professional courtesy, between pilots) there was no record kept, of your identity. Different now, of course....

www.snopes.com...

The idea of stealing pilot's uniforms is plausible. As well as ID badges, and then making a facsimile of one on your computer, with YOUR name, and laminating it. (NOW, of course, there are anti-counterfeiting measures used on Company IDs).

But, as to uniforms??? You didn't have to STEAL them, either back then. MANY companies sold them, by mail order, for every airline in the USA. Back then, you did NOT have to "prove" you were actually employed by that airline....all you'd then need is the "hardware"..(wings for the jacket, and emblem for the hat). THAT you'd have to steal, since they are given out (meted out, due to cost) by personnel management, at your particular company. However, some airline "Company stores" also would sell them.....

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also, as to "teaching" you, I made a post (did a lot of work on it) for another thread, so we can make this your first "lesson": www.abovetopsecret.com...

There is also a video clip, from a Dutch TV program, where they re-create, with an amateur pilot, flying into the Pentagon, using a simulator. It's on YouTube, and Google.

This is from YouTube, it's in Dutch. The Google version has English subtitles:

Originally posted by cluckerspud
Korg, with all due respect. Your OP should have better outlined "your theory" to help keep this thread form spinning out of control. Your mistake was this:

Originally posted by Korg Trinity
What do you guys make of that???

This vid has me going nuts...

Asking people what they "make of it" allows for all sorts of interpretations.
Why ask us what we make of it when you clearly have the answer?!

I have my opinion which the video fits very well into and I was asking for other people to look at the video and to ask what they thought.

What I was not asking for is for a bunch of debunkers and anti-truthers to state they are right and anyone whom believes anything other than their opinion is crazy and needs professional help.

I respect other peoples opinions, I don't respect those that look to poo poo others ideas especially as you have no clue whom you are conversing with...

Korg.

Originally posted by Korg Trinity
What I was not asking for is for a bunch of debunkers and anti-truthers to state they are right and anyone whom believes anything other than their opinion is crazy and needs professional help.

You didn't ask for it, but you sure got it huh?!
Again, please present your detailed theory. Why are you avoiding the most important
part of this thread. Why not include your theory in your OP?!
You failed on page 1 in the pursuit to discuss anything.

You lose! Good day sir.

reply to post by Korg Trinity



Page 16 and your stance is unclear to most people joining in.
If you had set the parameter and details of your theory, you could have set a better tone for discussion.
It's amazing that you don't even understand that.

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

Not only did the ones assigned to each hijacked airplane have COMMERCIAL pilot certificates, they had spent months (years?) practicing. They purchased simulator time, in real full-motion airliner simulators, in various locations around the world.

But, despite all that, I can tell you this: Even if YOU have never flown so much as a Microsoft Flight Sim on a PC desktop, I could show you the basics, just to do what they did, in very little time. I could take you from knowing nothing, sit you down in a classroom (the ones we use, at the airline, with the training materials, photos of the instrument panels, etc) and cover a lot in just a few hours' time of instruction.

Oh Reeehheaally??

You should review this...

Pilots for 9/11 Truth

Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe who have gathered together for one purpose. We are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day based on solid data and facts -- since 9/11/2001 is the catalyst for many of the events shaping our world today -- and the United States Government doesn't seem to be very forthcoming with answers or facts.

Care to revisit your thoughts and re-evaluate??

Korg.

Originally posted by cluckerspud
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

Page 16 and your stance is unclear to most people joining in.
If you had set the parameter and details of your theory, you could have set a better tone for discussion.
It's amazing that you don't even understand that.

I have explained on a number of occasions throughout the thread what I personally believe happened. But that is not what this thread is about. It's about asking others what they think and hopefully adding some evidence.

It's called collaboration.... Something clearly you don’t understand!

Korg.

reply to post by Korg Trinity

Collaboration? Reading this thread it clearly looks one sided.
9/11 could possibly be an inside job, who knows? But CGI planes, doctored footage, ufos, balls, missiles?
There is far more evidence (real, unedited) to support otherwise, therefore when people talk about this subject matter in fantastical terms they become, in my eyes, the de-bunkers and anti truthers.

Lets not sway toward uncompassionate ignorance.

S

Originally posted by stucoles
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

Collaboration? Reading this thread it clearly looks one sided.

S

Exactly how is "What could this Be?? 911 - Second Strike Footage... Wing Disapears" one sided???



Korg.

reply to post by Korg Trinity


oK OK OK.... Now I see how deep this delusion goes...

Please answer me ONE question... Do you think a Passenger Jet hit the pentagon?

Click here to learn more about this warning.

Originally posted by MiMobs
reply to post by Korg Trinity

 

oK OK OK.... Now I see how deep this delusion goes...

Please answer me ONE question... Do you think a Passenger Jet hit the pentagon?

You can take the blue pill if you want, I choose the red pill.

And I absolutely categorically do not think that what hit the wtc was a passenger jet!!

This is not a delusion..... There are some truths that you may not want to look into... I.E. the Videos from the pilots for 911 truth.... Try and take a deep breath and look into the reasons why there are so many that do not believe the OS... You may learn something and then come back without your attitude and we can have proper conversation...

Korg.

reply to post by LifeSux


Awesome. Thank you for the link.
Yeah...after seeing alot of other angles/views in the thread, since I las posted, it's pretty clear that this particular video is just some REALLY strange anomaly.

Thanks again.

reply to post by Korg Trinity


Answer my simple question.. DID A PASSENGER JET HIT THE PENTAGON?

Also.. I was rude in my last post and to the Mods I apologize.

But you said
"so you are saying anyone that doesnt believe the OS needs professional help"

Quite the opposite .. I also think the OS is BS.... But I think that there is this fringe group that have eaten the fantasy pill and have started to get into a delusional area of theory.

If you think the plane hitting the WTC is CGI.. IMO your very misguided.

*** ATTENTION ***

Knock off the bickering and name calling....

Posting Bans coming up.

Originally posted by MiMobs

Answer my simple question.. DID A PASSENGER JET HIT THE PENTAGON?

I did answer it and I said I absolutly do not think that what hit the WTC was a passanger Jet.

Korg.

reply to post by elevatedone


I apologize.. I allowed myself to react in a negative manner.. I think I was allot of the reason for the negativity... I will stop that right this post

reply to post by Korg Trinity


Yes it did.. and it was removed.. lets get back on topic.
Will you please answer my question. Did a passenger jet hit the pentagon - In your opinion.

Hello? I said P-e- n-t-a-g-o-n ... I know your take on the WTC.. I am asking about the pentagon.