I can appreciate your opinion but I think it is off base. UfO enthusiasts have had to bear with the no smoking gun evidence argument for ever.
Personally I think that this secret is not like some kind of petty theft or grape vine gossip that always gets out. These secrets have full time
careers built around keeping them secure. You will never get the proof you seek because the risks are too great.
Having said that there is reams of evidence that supports the hypothesis. No bright shiny spacecraft but lots of little clues. To ignore them is
being ignorant. You must put in the research time and build the case.
I respect researcher Stanton Friedman, I don't consider myself a disciple but he has put in the time and effort. Here's what he thinks:
As a nuclear physicist who has had a serious interest in flying saucers since 1958, I have reached four major conclusions:
1. The evidence is overwhelming that Planet Earth is being visited by intelligently controlled extraterrestrial spacecraft. In other words,
SOME UFOs are alien spacecraft. Most are not.
2. The subject of flying saucers represents a kind of Cosmic Watergate, meaning that some few people in major governments have known since
July, 1947, when two crashed saucers and several alien bodies were recovered in New Mexico, that indeed SOME UFOs are ET. As noted in 1950, it's the
most classified U.S. topic.
3. None of the arguments made against conclusions One and Two by a small group of debunkers such as Carl Sagan, my University of Chicago
classmate for three years, can stand up to careful scrutiny.
4. The Flying Saucer story is the biggest story of the millennium: visits to Planet Earth by aliens and the U.S. government's cover-up of
the best data (the bodies and wreckage) for over fifty years.
And as for skeptics and debunkers he thinks:
The problem is NOT that there is not enough evidence to justify my conclusions; but that most people, especially the noisy negativists, are unaware of
the real, non-tabloid evidence.
Debunkers seem to employ four major rules:
1. What the public doesn't know, we certainly won't tell them. The largest official USAF UFO study isn't even mentioned in twelve anti-UFO
books, though every one of those books' authors was aware of it.
2. Don't bother me with the facts, my mind is made up.
3. If one can't attack the data, attack the people. It is easier.
4. Do one's research by proclamation rather than investigation. It is much easier, and nobody will know the difference anyway.
This sums it up nicely in my opinion and I suspect the OP fits into some of what he is saying about the noisy negativists:
It's clear that over 97% of the people have NOT read any of the five major scientific studies I discuss, and are unaware of the mountains of evidence
that support my conclusions. They are also unaware of the scientific data, as opposed to tabloid nonsense. However, it is also clear from the Opinion
Polls and from my own experience that indeed most people accept the notion that SOME UFOs are alien spacecraft. The greater the education, the MORE
likely an individual is to accept this proposition. In an October 25, 1995, Oxford University Debate on the resolution "Planet Earth is being visited
by intelligent extraterrestrial life", the affirmative side, of which I was a part, garnered 60% of Debate Union Member votes on the question.
Ninety-two percent of 100,000 people calling during a TV Debate in London on June 27,1997, said Earth has been visited by aliens!
www.stantonfriedman.com...
[edit on 13-2-2010 by sparrowstail]