It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HimWhoHathAnEar
Just as society has rules against prostitution,
Originally posted by HimWhoHathAnEar
I don't care to tell them anything, or you for that matter. I know where you stand and I'm weary of your thread. Have a nice night.
Originally posted by Bunken Drum
a) Whether you're a literalist or not, if you follow the basic tenets of a religion, you are accepting someone else's description of the ineffable, which by the internal logic of religion cannot be other than conjecture, for this reason:
b) If you accept that you cannot know the spiritual divinity here on earth, ie it is ineffable, then you must accept that you cannot know what instructions about earthly life have come from the divine, what is inspired by mental illness & what is just lies.
Thus I submit I was right about "crackpot" in the 1st place.
My own faith waxes & wanes. Its based around a hodge-podge of different pagan ideas & bits of philosophy. I made it up to fit my own spiritual experiences, basically, & its constantly being revised in the light of new ones. Trying to practice what I preach, so to speak...
Originally posted by tezzajw
Gays 'will never go to heaven'
www.heraldsun.com.au
(visit the link for the full news article)
HOMOSEXUALS and transsexuals "will never enter the kingdom of heaven", a leading Roman Catholic cardinal said overnight.
Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan said that while the Church regarded homosexuality as an "insult to God", this did not justify discrimination against gay and transsexual people.
Originally posted by Gaspode
Jesus spent most of His days amongst the sinners, like whores and thieves. I'm sure if Jesus wasn't the Son of God, He would have gone to hell as well, according to some of these guys' teachings and theories...
Well, logic is the issue here. If we accept the omnipotence of divinity, then certainly instruction from on-high would be possible. However, if we also accept the ineffability of divinity, then we are saying that we cannot know the spiritual being, thus how can we distinguish something we understand as divinely inspired, as opposed to something we understand thats delusional or manipulative? We cannot, since we cannot know divinity. What it comes down to is a human judgement: this idea fits my notion of divine will; that does not. This is an open door for prejudice to rule our own thinking & for crackpottery to influence it.
This does not seem logical to me-
...
- there is no contradiction, however, in believing that God (who passess all physical/spiritual barriers and understanding) can send instructions to those of us in the physical realm in physical terms that we understand them