It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xsamaelx
Doesn't seem like a very credible source.
If you see his youtube video he is way over-acting and it seems extremely sensationalist.
FYI - He is government . . . I tend not to believe a government bureaucrat and listen to someone in Academia . . . IMHO
Originally posted by fleabit
FYI - He is government . . . I tend not to believe a government bureaucrat and listen to someone in Academia . . . IMHO
I don't know why people have such a deep mistrust for the government on absolutely every level. You actually believe they'd rather see people die, than warn them?
Mt. Saint Helens: They knew in advance, once the signs were apparently it was going to erupt, they evacuated everyone in plenty of time. They forced evacuations. The only numskulls that died were those who didn't trust the government and warnings, and stayed.
What would they have to gain by NOT warning people if they felt there was a real threat? Oh yea.. the clever agenda to reduce our population by any means necessary, I forgot.
Again, I'd trust someone who has been on site for a long time, and knows exactly what he is looking at, versus a random geologist we've never heard of. Just because he works for the government doesn't mean he is a liar, an evil NWO agenda agent, or a dummy.
Originally posted by stinkhorn
reply to post by DraconianKing
Actually, if you read up on volcanic seismic activity, the earth quakes are rather small in nature ranging from 2-3 not 4-5. The frequency of quakes and the depth is what the concern is about. Mt. St.Helens experienced small tremors in the range of 2-3 in power near the surface or at about 1km down.