It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shirakawa
Moshpet, I appreciate your dedication but I personally don't think there's the need to comment every single day of Yellowstone seismic activity making this already big thread even bigger. There's really nothing anomalous going on at Yellowstone right now - a few small earthquakes now and then are normal, in fact about 1400 occur each year in the park on average. It's almost summer and there will be a lot of visitors and tourists: that's added noise from human source. Also virtually any earthquake of magnitude greater than 5.5 occurred anywhere in the world (less if closer) will show on seismometers in a way or another, this is normal too.
I think you can safely switch to weekly or monthly updates unless something "big" happens.
[edit on 2009/6/14 by Shirakawa]
Originally posted by Robin Marks
reply to post by pantangele
Robin Marks "I temper the hell out of everything..... Jake Lowenstern has tempered his message in the videos he produced. Both the motive and the presentation have been manipulated to sustain a public perception. "Yes, Yellowstone is a volcano." Implying that public perception is unaware that Yellowstone is an active volcano which could erupt. And that's not the way the government wants us to see it......And trust me, I temper the hell out of my own ideas. I would drop anything like a hot potato if it doesn't stand up to reason."
There's a lot of supposed tempering going on here.....The Marks guy is quite the scientist eh?. He should post his diplomas on the shower wall behind his "experiments". Here's the Lowenstern link....I just tracked it down again to view with the above ideas in mind.
www.youtube.com...
Go view it yourself.
Conclusion: The above critique by Marks is CACA. It doesnt make any sense. Read what this guy has written. I just scratch my head when i read it. My question: Why title the movie "Yes Yellostone is a Volcano" unless you wanted to communicate that very point?
The criticism of the Lowenstern guys motives is also complete CACA. Why would the geological survey warn about St. Helens, or Redoubt or Pinnatubo and not Yellowstone? You fools who believe the pajama bathroom experiment guy are missing the jewel that is a govt science agency that bothers to put out seismometers that you can read on the web. Personally I hope they shut them down and force you to wonder at an entirely deeper level. From what i see in the Lowenstern youtube movies he is delivering a Joe Friday "Just the Facts Ma'am" story. If you'll notice he frequently looks away from the camera. Teleprompter readers don't do this. I think the sillyness about "unscripted" is the Marks guys pathetic attempt to grasp for some credibility. He has none. Follow that link to those movies. It's a much better source of info than anything I've read in this thread.
Note: Its June 13, 2009 and Jellyston has not erupted. Rats
Originally posted by FeedingTheRat
Originally posted by Robin Marks
reply to post by pantangele
Robin Marks "I temper the hell out of everything..... Jake Lowenstern has tempered his message in the videos he produced. Both the motive and the presentation have been manipulated to sustain a public perception. "Yes, Yellowstone is a volcano." Implying that public perception is unaware that Yellowstone is an active volcano which could erupt. And that's not the way the government wants us to see it......And trust me, I temper the hell out of my own ideas. I would drop anything like a hot potato if it doesn't stand up to reason."
There's a lot of supposed tempering going on here.....The Marks guy is quite the scientist eh?. He should post his diplomas on the shower wall behind his "experiments". Here's the Lowenstern link....I just tracked it down again to view with the above ideas in mind.
www.youtube.com...
Go view it yourself.
Conclusion: The above critique by Marks is CACA. It doesnt make any sense. Read what this guy has written. I just scratch my head when i read it. My question: Why title the movie "Yes Yellostone is a Volcano" unless you wanted to communicate that very point?
The criticism of the Lowenstern guys motives is also complete CACA. Why would the geological survey warn about St. Helens, or Redoubt or Pinnatubo and not Yellowstone? You fools who believe the pajama bathroom experiment guy are missing the jewel that is a govt science agency that bothers to put out seismometers that you can read on the web. Personally I hope they shut them down and force you to wonder at an entirely deeper level. From what i see in the Lowenstern youtube movies he is delivering a Joe Friday "Just the Facts Ma'am" story. If you'll notice he frequently looks away from the camera. Teleprompter readers don't do this. I think the sillyness about "unscripted" is the Marks guys pathetic attempt to grasp for some credibility. He has none. Follow that link to those movies. It's a much better source of info than anything I've read in this thread.
Note: Its June 13, 2009 and Jellyston has not erupted. Rats
for the record since i found out what yellowstone is and since a few of my profic dreams have come true in shockingly detail i might add . i have had about 70 odd dreams about yellowstone blowing her top in OUR LIFE TIME . to the exact dates i have no clue . it could be a year or 10 years . but ill know by my gut feeling which i might add is never wrong .
what we are waiting for is a series of quakes in the center of the park of a mag. of at least 7.9 if not higher.
St Helens is not a supervolcano and theres no geologic evidence suggesting this. This is total BS and the fools who uttered the word supervolcano with St Helens belong in jail.
These dreams, were they before of after you found out about Yellowstone, or a bit of both?
i have had about 70 odd dreams about yellowstone blowing her top in OUR LIFE TIME . to the exact dates i have no clue . it could be a year or 10 years . but ill know by my gut feeling which i might add is never wrong .
Originally posted by PuterMan
Shirakawa: 80X ?? Try 40 or 20, makes much better listening and much more identifiable.