Whats going on at yellowstone?

Originally posted by SixNine

Originally posted by sueloujo
Could anybody answer my question? Is there a possibility that HAARP in Alaska could be causing this? With the quakes in Alaska and the news story thar many people in Alaska had seen lights in the sky and a loud boom..also China accusing the USA of using it??

I'm sorry but I had to ROTF and LMAO on that question.

Haarp be used to trigger earthquakes? ! lololol

Before youscoff at somebodys question maybe you should do some research

www.littlemountainsmudge.com...

try here for a start!

Hi all, my first post here. Just found a good source to check on animal behaviour:

wolves.wordpress.com...

It's some biologist reporting wolf behaviour. Everything seems normal, but you might find something interesting i'm missing.

Greets from Spain.

reply to post by SixNine
[more

Before you scoff at somebodys innocent question and show how rude you are...maybe you should do dome research

try here for a start

www.littlemountainsmudge.com...

Here's some new research (just posted today at sciencedaily) regarding trapped water on or near fault lines. I think it could be highly pertinent here.

www.sciencedaily.com...

Just a side notice..

On the old faithfull webcam there is a lot of steam everywhere.
link

Just a side notice..

On the old faithfull webcam there is a lot of steam everywhere.
link

reply to post by TrueAmerican


I don't personally think there are coverups involved, probably UUSS geologists chose a larger vertical scale for LKWY station because otherwise the chart would have looked very messy, at least during the most active days of this swarm.

Please note that even at 500 microvolts per division it takes just a 1.0 magnitude (or something more, but not much) earthquake beneath Yellowstone lake to reach clip points on LKWY station.

And further I just want to point out that things seem to be a lot more consistent in Gee, with all scales that I have seen set to microns/second. And there I have another question: is there a setting on these that allows a similar recalibration for the live output feeds received in Gee? Because if there is, they could be deceiving us there too.

I think it is certainly possible to convert those units of measurement to each other, but at the moment I don't know how.

And as if all this wasn't confusing enough, microvolts (on Webicorders) and microns (or millimeters when EQ get strong enough, on GEE) indicate seismic wave amplitude, but micron/seconds indicate amplitude velocity, which is a different thing from what I've read. And if you open UUSS stations on GEE (by manually adding the WY network), all stations available on the Webicorder with vertical scales in microvolts, here have a vertical scale in in nanometers (which become micrometers or millimeters when strong enough EQs occur, but this is not an issue).

[edit on 2009/1/4 by Shirakawa]

Originally posted by sueloujo
reply to post by SixNine
[more

Before you scoff at somebodys innocent question and show how rude you are...maybe you should do dome research

try here for a start

www.littlemountainsmudge.com...

Do you have any idea the required amount of energy it would take to create an earthquake? Let me explain this another way... Do you have any idea how much matter is ejected from the sun in the form of energy per day, which is absorbed by the ionosphere? HAARP isn't nothing compared to the sun. IT would be like shooting a BB at a freight train and expecting it to derail.

Also might I add that this technology has been around a very long time, since the 60's and several countries have one. So why Haarp? Now you might be able to zap someone with it, steal communications with it, or maybe even shoot a icbm down with it by focusing enough energy on it. An earthquake however, huge storm, etc is simply out of the question.

I even went and looked up the power output of it: 3.6 megawatts (MW) of power...

A lightning bolt charge contains 30 million volts at 100,000 amperes.

The total energy in a large thunderstorm is more than that in an atomic bomb.

Also Europe has a more powerful one then we do, they are running a 1gw

en.wikipedia.org...

[edit on 4-1-2009 by SixNine]

[edit on 4-1-2009 by SixNine]

reply to post by Infinity Eagle

Clip from your article:

""The apparent triggering of the Yellowstone tremors by the Alaska quake "confirms what we are beginning to see worldwide - that earthquakes can be triggered by other earthquakes at great distances, more so than we had thought before," said Robert. B. Smith, a University of Utah professor of geology and geophysics and coordinating scientist for the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory."

Good hunting!
That Prof. Smith said it even better.

If you put several floating pieces of paper in a shallow bowl and gently bump one , from that point others get bumped. = plate tech.

Basic Physics is Universal.
Volcanic systems are not isolated.
If all any one focuses on is a single system, they isolate their perspective.

Very good article find!

Still wondering why RSOE EDIS Emergency and Disaster Information Service:

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Is reporting Yellowstone as Volcanic Activity and not earthquake

Also I sure wish I could find a factual information as to any possible danger of the situation, that is not linked to 2012, Area51, Planet X, Mainstream Religious Cults, X File officianatoes... etc.

Originally posted by coolvibe
Just a side notice..

On the old faithfull webcam there is a lot of steam everywhere.
link

My question is whether there is normally this much steam when it's this time of year? This may be normal. I don't remember if I've ever watched the cam when there's snow on the ground and it's really cold out.

Can anyone answer this?

LKWY is not part of the same network system (different leader diffrent prfrence) as other seismo's at Yellowstone.

Also in the most recent (2004 dome building) event at St. Helens they adjusted several of the minitors sitting on top of the action or they just look like all the wind noise we had earlier in the week.

reply to post by Shirakawa


Not sure bout the bottom part of that there. From what I've read, the microns/sec in the TA (Transportable Array) sensors scales at least, refer to how far the ground travels (by virtue of the fact that the sensors are in the ground) and in what direction- depending on which of the 3 channels BHE, BHN, and BHZ- you are looking at. The velocity of those movements can then be extracted if needed from the plotted movement over the time interval of say, 1 second. But it's sort of pretty obvious what moving fast and what's moving slower from the amplitude readings. Fast= closer together and slower=further apart.

And again I want to remind people of just how minute most of these movements are. Dust specs.

Originally posted by coolvibe
Just a side notice..

On the old faithfull webcam there is a lot of steam everywhere.
link

I was just about to comment on this also as I have been watching the webcam all morning and what I have been seeing if farrrr from normal. If you look at it now it is venting pretty good, it has been venting like this for the past 2 hours i have been watching it and had one large eruption. I am not sure if the camera is focused on Old Faithful or not but whichever Geyser this is it has been letting off a lot of steam constantly all morning (or at least for the past two hours).

Namaste,

Maeve

[edit on 1/4/09 by maeveoc]

4.3 quake in "nearby" Nevada... (posted for correlation to seismic monitors)

== PRELIMINARY EARTHQUAKE REPORT ==



Region: NEVADA
Geographic coordinates: 41.693N, 114.405W
Magnitude: 4.3 Ml
Depth: 0 km
Universal Time (UTC): 4 Jan 2009 15:29:20
Time near the Epicenter: 4 Jan 2009 07:29:20
Local standard time in your area: 4 Jan 2009 10:29:20

Location with respect to nearby cities:
30 km (18 miles) SE (131 degrees) of San Jacinto, NV
41 km (26 miles) NE (44 degrees) of Wilkins, NV
50 km (31 miles) NNW (327 degrees) of Tecoma, NV
110 km (68 miles) NNW (345 degrees) of West Wendover, NV
235 km (146 miles) WNW (297 degrees) of Salt Lake City, UT


ADDITIONAL EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS
________________________________
event ID : NN 00270790

This is a computer-generated message and has not yet been reviewed by a
seismologist.
For subsequent updates, maps, and technical information, see:
earthquake.usgs.gov...
or
earthquake.usgs.gov...

Nevada Seismological Laboratory
University
of Nevada, Reno

www.seismo.unr.edu...

reply to post by maeveoc


The color is darker also, sometime's it's white as it should be.
On the right side of the cam looks like melted snow / water to me.

delete post- duplicate info

[edit on 1/4/2009 by sad_eyed_lady]

reply to post by Shirakawa

Yep, and you can safely guess that the people monitoring and calibrating these stations like attention just as much as everyone else does. Being scientists and seismologists I think they should be held to a universal standard as far as graphic representations go.
What gives? Why is everyone so darned coy with their precious information? Ego does not belong there.

Do you suppose they compete to see who gets the most web hits?

reply to post by sad_eyed_lady


Upper nevada,
unless TwinFalls has moved farther north all of a sudden

Originally posted by coolvibe
Just a side notice..

On the old faithfull webcam there is a lot of steam everywhere.
link

This was discussed yesterday. A couple of posters that were familiar with the geysers explained that the constant steam was normal for this time of year. Most people visit Yellowstone in warmer weather and the steam is not as noticeable then. Sort of like exhaling in warm weather versus cold. Your exhaled breath is the same, but it only steams in cold air.

Also, there are several geysers in the area that add to the steam and water eruptions.

Typically the steam is white or light gray. However, when it is dense enough, or when light hits it just right, it can appear dark gray (sort of like rain clouds).