Georgia congressman warns of Obama dictatorship

Is this the same senator that just released a video apology of his remarks regarding the topic of this post?

It just hit the Breitbart video service...

AJC: U.S. Rep. Paul Broun of Georgia acknowledged that he called Obama a Marxist at a Rotary Club meeting in Augusta last week. In an Associated Press interview Monday night, he went further, charging that an Obama campaign proposal for a civilian national security reserve corps would be like the security forces of Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union.

Source www.breitbart.tv...

It would seem that Rep. Broun misspoke.

reply to post by Question Fate


Yup. Doomsday is obviously one of those who still thinks blacks are like monkeys. One of those who used to say slavery was a "peculiar institution that helped civilize a backwards people".

Old style thinking that, fortunately for us, has mostly been forgotten.

Obama is being set up even before he takes office. He is being set up to establish a basis to create a race war so that the president can declare a national disaster and subsequently, their main goal, Martial law. This will crash the dollar, and then it will shift over to the AMERO. The gold confiscation act of 1933, put through by one of our more notorious traitors, and bad presidents, FDR. Just one of many but one of the worse. He failed to bring us into a dictatorship and they settled for WWII. Hell, Wall Street financed Hitler in 1928, [Prescott Bush, Duponts, Rothschilds, Rockefeller, IBM and the list goes on] Once the North American Union is formed it will join the South American Union, African Union, European Union....google these....watch what happens. and finall the world government no later than 2010. The evidence is irrefutable........and shocking.

reply to post by Question Fate

Originally posted by -zeropoint-
Stop spamming your own damn thread, desperate child. There's no threat to be warning and fear-mongering about, stop such non-sense. I really thought Americans were more realistic and mature in their conduct, it just seems that it's the neocons who can't accept what is, we've found our problem. The minute I saw it was coming from a rightest Republican, I knew it was meaningless. Stop producing fear-mongering negative energy, the man isn't inaugurated yet for Pete's living sake.

So Paul Revere was childish for warning the people that england was about to kill them all and enslave america to what they did in 1913, monopoly money.

The problem is that Americans are so divided, that they can only come together around causes that are created out of lies, basicly artificial causes. Its only when we all snap out of this pre-programmed pc society of "just obey or follow" crowd, that we can all realize our true conciousness, real freedom. IM a civilised truth follower and seeker, who when provoked, uses absolute truths, but yet the world is so in the lie, they mock and destroy out of the denial of shame, and the embrace of false pride.

reply to post by tgambill


I hope not. Actually, the only good thing I see at present from Obama being president, is that it might actually help race relations. NO non-white has ever been president before. Some were mixed, but, not noticeably.
I'm just hoping it's not a marxist takeover.

reply to post by Anonymous ATS


Why was that a reply to my post?

It said nothing of what I mentioned other then relaying that I mentioned Bush.

I don't care whether it was Bush or George Washington who passed the items I listed - the unconstitutional legislation passed in the last 8 years is despicable. Sorry if I upset you when I mentioned Bush's name, but it was under his regime and thus he's responsible for such stifling, intrusive, illegal acts. I hope he and his administration is held accountable ... and would hope that if it happened under George Washington's reign that he would have been held accountable.

reply to post by mastermind77


Paul Revere did not warn people that "england was about to kill them all and enslave america to what they did in 1913, monopoly money." He just warned people that they were coming...

But, more importantly, what he was warning of was true. The British were coming. Now if Paul Revere said, "OMG The British are coming and they have aliens on their side and they are going to steal our pension funds and rape our children", well then he wouldn't be famous today.

Want people to listen? Say something with substance.

reply to post by The Revealer
Well I'm sure things won't get worse then under George W. Bush Jr.

My guess is you are another Republican and this scare tactic is unfounded.

I doubt if President Obama is going to enforce a "Police State".

He wants to disassemble Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba as well as outlaw waterboarding (a form of torture George Bush allowed).

Will the new administration press to learn the full extent of the Bush administration's electronic eavesdropping and data-mining activities, and will it curtail or halt some of them?

The Bush administration exerted tight control over the Justice Department by hiring more Republican-leaning political appointees and ousting those who were viewed as disloyal. Will Obama give the department more ideological independence?

Because of George W. Bush Jr.'s rule the large Corporations have been allowed to run amok in America causing jobs to go overseas (cheap labor vs American jobs), banks to operate unchecked and basically all the "good old boys" have been allowed to do as they please unchecked, and unaccountable to no one at the expense of the American People.

I will mention this Trillion dollar war again because

1) The American people were lied to and manipulated by the Bush Administration into this war.

2) This war is costing us a fortune.

You are either really stupid or one of the elite.

Police State. We already have become very close to a police state thanks to "Republican Rule".

You're post is proof that people will stubbornly hold on to their core beliefs even if they are detremental to the whole group all in the name of pride.

George W. Bush worked for the large Corporations.

Barack Obama hopefully will work for the people.

[edit on 12-11-2008 by ofhumandescent]

reply to post by ofhumandescent


The sad truth is, it can get worse... much worse.

we are currently at sometihng like 7% unemployment rate in america... that can get worse.

We havent had an attack on US soil in 7 years, our borders have not been penetrated by any mass troop movement.... it can get worse.

While money is tight for most americans... most of us can still eat and drive to work... it can get worse.

Even under Bush's rule, we still enjoy most freedoms and liberties that we have always enjoyed as americans.... it can get worse.

As stated before, I am not here saying that Obama is or will be the ruination of america or mankind. I'm not saying that he is a dictator waiting to happen, or even the Antichrist. But he could be, and we need to give him the same scrutiny and distrust that we gave Bush, especially here on ATS.... untill such time as he proves himself worthy of something but.. and that isnt going to happen within the first 3 years of his administration

Obama is puppet to the Bilderbergers via his chief advisor, Zegb. Brezenski. Obama will cater and do what they say to lead us to the new World order.


the new world order are:

1. an international army

2. an international police force

3. a world bank for the economy

4. a world government under the United Nations

5. a world conservatory bank for wilderness preservation around the world. That means all "green" movements will be melded into the new international bank or disappear altogether

6. a world religion where all church doctrines will be destroyed at the roots to be replaced by the new world religion of the age of Aquarius

7. the world seven-races classification for all human slaves who will fulfill predetermined work tasks whether they agree with it or not

8. the world concentration headquarters at the United Nations for those who will not accept the new system

9. the world agriculture and food supply control which will control food and vitamin supplies around the world.

The new world order will be an "in-between" government system for USSR, Great Britian and all its commonwealths, and the United States with its melting-pot population.

This is, at the end, a new spiritual and political world order which will replace the old ones under which we live right now.

What are the new world order plans?

They plan on the destruction of all people who believe in the Bible or worship Jesus Christ, and the complete disappearance of Christianity. To achieve this plan, the new world order is changing national laws to assure that Christian beliefs and symbols like the cross, for instance, will become outlawed and unlawful. Religious holidays and ceremonies will be replaced with new age festivities around the world.

The elimination and complete destruction of all secret societies and secret brotherhoods, lodges and sanctuaries, all of which they view as the most serious threats to their survival after the implementation of the one world religion and one world government.

The new world order also plans the abolition of all national curriencies, and the transfer of commerce to electronic cash through the superhighway.

The thinkers and the basic doctrine of the new age conspiracies books are:

Elena Petrovna Blavatsky, who wrote "Isis Unveiled" and "The Secret Doctrine."

Alice A. Bailey who wrote "The Race and the Initiation and Externalization of the Heirarchy;" "Initiation: Human and Savior;" "The Reappearance of the Christ." (Their Christ is the new messiah). "The Destiny of the Nation," in which are plans for the disposition of the nation-states; "The Unfinished Autobiography;" "Disciplineship and the New Age;" "Esoteric Psychology."

These books are very important for new age thinkers who are exactly the ones who are conspiring to implement the New World Order.

It could help race relations if that was the purpose. It might even work for a period of time. However, this is not how they work at least since they came up with the plan by Weishaupt on may 1, 1776. Its been carried from Rothschild family to sibling for generations picking up family dynasties since then. Today there are 13 major elite families that make up this conspiracy and 1,000's of participants that are given just enough information to bring them in.


reply to post by Clearskies

reply to post by tgambill


Yeah, like the 'elite' care about us commoners' race-relations!
They stir up the pot in most cases against each other.
Probably the KKK had it's origins with them. Albert Pike.
La Raza.

reply to post by tgambill


Marxism says the 'in-between' phase for USSR is Socialism.
The Bible is ALWAYS true.

Hi There,

This has been a painful thread to respond to. It is incredible to cognize the way many people think, the lunacy that is passed off as sane questioning. It becomes something of a severely stubbed toe to test the intellectual waters here, because the waters are not deep, but shallow and restrictive, and infested with neo-con-rep piranha...it is so despairing.

Fortunately, others are in similar thoughtful patterns, so one is not alone when engaging the one-thought brick wall mindset. An interesting piece appeared on the Huffpost by Bob Cesca...I think it speaks for a lot of us.

www.huffingtonpost.com...

Best wishes

reply to post by elysiumfire


Look. You want to keep throwing around the word neocon, because you are
UNABLE to look at what people are about, behind the words.
Obama's MOTHER was a communist, his grandfather was a communist, his associates were communist,< Do you see a pattern, here?
Look it up for yourself.

If the waters are too shallow, open the floodgates of your supposed wisdom.
Peace.
Your 'intellectual violence' for the day!

[edit on 12-11-2008 by Clearskies]

reply to post by Clearskies


Most of the people I associate with are conservative republican leaning...

As you are no doubt aware of by now, I am not one.

Consider it.

reply to post by Clearskies

Look. You want to keep throwing around the word neocon, because you are
UNABLE to look at what people are about, behind the words.
Obama's MOTHER was a communist, his grandfather was a communist, his associates were communist,< Do you see a pattern, here?

Thank you for saying it. I was catching up on the thread, and was about to post a reply to elysiumfire, when I say your reply. I've starred your post.

First of all, the huffington post is hardly an unbiased site. It is even further to the left than Karl Marx!

I doubt some of these people even know what a neo-con is. In fact, most of the members that I know on ATS, who call themselves conservatives, are NOT neo-cons. They are traditional conservatives.
It seems that anyone that opposes Obama and his socialist friends is called a neo-con. In reality, we are just Americans, who believe in the Constitution of the United States, and don't want it desecrated by socialists.

It won't be long before these Obama supporters become disillusioned, when it becomes apparent that he has no intention of following through with most of his promises. Already he has backed off on many of them, and he isn't even President yet.

Guess what....Karl Marx didn't write the Communist Manifesto. The root document was passed to Marx via Albert Pike and after it was rewritten by Clinton Roosevelt in 1841 under a different name. Clinton was an ancestor of a major traitor, named FDR. Clinton obtained the document from Mazzini who received it from Adam Weishaupt. I have a reprint of Clinton Roosevelt's root document.....true story.



reply to post by ProfEmeritus

reply to post by elysiumfire


Why is it lunacy to question Obama's own words? You heard and seen it, right? I am not a neo-con nor am I a Republican but I want to know what he means when he said:

“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

He did not ever back away from what he said. He never went back to clearify any misconceptions as he did so many times. He got a pass on it by the media. Now he said it and I want to know what he ment. If Mcain said anything like this, I would be on my soap box screaming he is a Nazi thug but I am not going to disregard what Obama said because of partisanship. If he actually means what he says and trys to act on it, you would agree this is a big concern, right?

reply to post by Clearskies


Don't bring the Bible into politics. Nothing could be less professional.