posted on Apr, 24 2007 @ 09:28 AM
If --- as Balducci claims --- aliens/ufos 'have always been here -- they are real' etc. --- then what changes?
Reportedly, there are eye-witnesses depictions of 'fleets of ufos' crossing the skies 800, 900 years ago. Ancient Sub-Continent manuscripts mention
'wars in the skies' and detail these flying craft. In England several hundred years ago, the entire congretation of a church reportedly watched a
'flying ship' (complete with sails) float slowly over their heads. The occupants of the craft reportedly 'waved' to those below and one of those
below reportedly grasped the anchor and was carried skywards. Reportedly, the anchor and a section of rope/chain are still to be seen outside the
church, the explanation being that the occupants of the craft dropped the anchor upon which the man was being carried aloft.
Several months ago, someone here in ATS provided twenty or more paintings, each several hundred years old, in which various depictions of ufos are to
be found. There's no doubt the 'craft' and/or objects contained within the photos are of extraterrestrial origin: when the paintings were created,
there were no flying craft in existence which had their origins on earth.
There are also numerous written descriptions of flying craft contained within writings many hundreds of years old.
We occupy this tiny fragment of Time and many alive now believe the world was created around them: that Time began when they hit the planet and will
end when they depart. Not so of course. We have far more efficient communications systems now than ever before and these allow us to discuss matters
in a way not available to those of previous eras. But ufos/aliens -- like cockroaches -- were here before we got here and doubtless they'll still be
around when we are no longer. We didn't 'discover' ufos/aliens: they were not sent here especially for those of this era. That's if we accept
as genuine the 'old/ancient' written, painted and carved 'evidence' for ufos/aliens claimed to lie in museums, dusty manuscripts, caves, etc.
We could be being duped. According to reports, the CIA and other 'intelligence' organisations 'wrote' and published thousands of books of a New
Age bent, beginning back in the late 50's, early 60's. These books were well publicised and promoted. Many people read them, even though they may
have forgotten doing so. I have a couple of hundred. Lost the lot at one point and painstakingly -- over several years --- set about replacing them.
They include the Van Danikens, Bergier and Pauwell's 'Morning of the Magician', all of Lyall Watson's, most of Mitchell's (my spelling may be a
bit off, seeing I don't have access to these books right this moment) and dozens of others, most with the original 60's psychedelic art work covers.
I read them avidly and believed them absolutely.
Later, I began to wonder if 'aliens' were of paranormal origin. But then, how to explain the 'foo fighters' of WW2? Hardbitten, experienced
airmen fighting for their lives and country were hardly the sort of people who'd 'invent' something as inexplicable as the 'foo fighters'.
I read Bruce Cathie. I have a book filled with colour photos taken from a plane above New Zealand and there is NO explanation that can explain the
objects/creatures in those photos: not 'weather baloons' or 'tricks of the light'. They're proof, seemingly, that we share our skies with things
not of this earth.
But then, WHO actually wrote the books -- do we know, beyond all doubt? Do we know beyond all doubt that someone in the 13th or 16th century actually
DID include 'alien/ufos' in their paintings? Were we there? Do we know for sure that those ufos weren't added to existing paintings by people with
an agenda, a lot of money and powerful publicity machine?
We're TOLD that ancient documents, religious manuscripts, paintings, etc. make mention or 'show' an awareness of 'aliens/ufos'. But if someone
were intent upon convincing people that ufos/aliens DO exist NOW --- they would (to establish credibility of 'aliens/ufos') seek to convince us that
these things have 'always' been around.
It's claimed that governments desperately 'cover up' and 'deny' the existence of 'aliens/ufos'. If that's their intention, they're
incredibly inept, aren't they? If governments are seeking to 'cover up' these things, they're doing a really bad job of it. Alleged
'whistle blowers' are a dime a dozen. I can't count the number of times I've read: ' Ex-NASA scientist reveals' -- ' Ex-top-brass-military
comes clean about ufos' --- 'Ex-astronaut tells all ', etc.
'Incriminating' photos of tunnels, domes, faces, etc. on Mars and the Moon et all are all over the Net. 'Tell All' books rank in their thousands.
Umpteen websites are devoted to intensive analysis and scrutiny of NASA photos. Thousands of ordinary folk post their photos of 'things' in the
sky every day.
So how can it be a 'conspiracy of silence' on the part of governments and others responsible for 'hiding things from the public' --- when
ufos/alien 'evidence' is EVERYwhere?
We have politicians, ex-Presidents, serving Presidents, airforce and military, pilots, etc. from all over the world telling us: ' I'm not supposed
to tell you this but Yes -- aliens/ufos exist '.
And now, reportedly, we have Vatican sources doing the same, for years.
Secret ?
Gee, there's more secrecy about Santa Claus.
ALL this 'secret' information and SO readily available !
Little bit 'oversell' ?
Wars are planned decades in advance. We're just little sheepies all too aware of our mortality: we seldom see the Big Picture. We're not members
of the World Planners, those with agendas.
The first 'ufo/alien/flying saucer' reports emerged in the late 1940's. Hitler was producing 'flying saucer' machines only a couple of years
prior.
The 50's saw the masses' introduction to these objects on wide scale via the movies and tv and comic books.
In the 60's the masses were introduced to 'hidden archaelogy' and New Age books, complete with photos of 'ancient astronauts' and their craft.
There were photos and drawings of 'newly scrutinised' ancient objects in museums: the little 'plane' which had previously been considered a bird,
the 'ancient battery' etc. And it sparked everyone's imagination. There were the 'alien' objects discovered in very old paintings and etchings,
which were claimed to have been 'overlooked' and 'misinterpreted' for centuries. Van Daniken 'reinterpreted' just about everything and even
though much of his claims were thoroughly debunked, the belief continued.
People wanted/want to believe that 'creatures' (aliens) from other dimensions/star systems etc. are 'good guys', here to save us.
Yet if -- as Balducci for example claims -- 'these things have always been here', then they're doing a #e job of 'saving us', don't you
think?
Most people -- when they speak of mass slaughter -- refer to the First and Second World Wars. And that would be bad enough. But the fact is, people
have been slaughtered in their tens of thousands since Time began. Doesn't sound much, when you're talking of strangers who lived hundreds of years
ago dying in their thousands. But they were just like us: they were terrorised, agonised, tortured, bled, cried, died in fear -- most of them just
ordinary people, wrong time and place.
This world is soaked in human blood. There's barely a place in existence that hasn't seen slaughter on horrific scale.
So if these 'aliens' have always 'been here' --- what they hell have they done apart from watch ... and maybe enjoy?
Yet people get all excited because some guy who's paid for his time by the Vatican announces 'aliens are real'. Like 'Wow -- they're real,
the Vatican says so. Hurrah! Oh joy! Our buddies are REAL ! '
Ok. If we accept they ARE real
...... So?