It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by secret titan
I just thought of something, if there is no time, wouldn't the energy you have just remain constant? If there was just a now, then the energy would just be like the energy you have now, and would be never ending. I know that I don't have neverending energy.
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Yes, you have just "timed" your self through the invention of "time".
"Existentially" there is no time as there was no beginning and there will be no ending to what is referred to as the "universe", and this universe is not a bubble.
I drive the same distance if im going faster or slower depending on how much energy i use i still get there with the same distance.
This is not all true. You can get to the same point faster while "using less energy". You see, every thing is energy and it is only energy traveling through its self, when this is introduced and applied to "science" we will see a change in Earth technology matching that of imagination.
Illusions are very real, but the only illusion is in the illusion its self and in that sense they are very fake. Either way, they still exist.
Time is a local human creation, not a "universal/Existential" constant
Originally posted by secret titan
You STILL haven't done anything other than attack the people whom have contributed to this thread.
Either learn how to actually respond, or don't bother wasting our time with your attacks.
Originally posted by StellarX
Time exists independent of observation and unless you believe the universe can not or did not evolve before there were entities that could observe it doing so you have no argument. You are in fact arguing that no trees could be falling because there you refuse to believe there is a forest.
Then feel free to start showing us why you believe this. Show us that the microwave background radiation does not prove a big bang or that redshift has nothing to do with 'speed' ( i know, i know) thus showing a accelerating expansion of the universe.
I would like to agree with at least some of this but find it impossible while you make such claims.
Illusions can be real in the sense that they twist human perception ( thus alter minds) but that's about as much sense as i could find in 'there'. It might be a good idea to think about that and 'simplify' ( and i am generously assuming it contains some kind of 'truth') it for the rest of us.
What do you mean by local? We can predict the amount of time it will take for a certain celestial events to take place and unless by local you mean a few tens of billions of light years there is nothing 'local' about time. Unless you can show that there is no consistency ( and thus largely trash GR) you will have to start dealing with time however unpleasant you may find the experience.
Stellar
Originally posted by Terapin
Time does not exist, in which case I wrote this post even before the thread started so what took you guys so long to read it? Or since it is all an illusion, I don't actually exist, and therefor never wrote this post, you are just imagining it. Then again, since time does not exist and all things exist at all times in a static state, you have all ready read this post and all ready know what I wrote.
Grasshopper, when you are able to snatch the pebble from my hand it will be time for your lesson in physics.
Until then, since you are reading this in a linear fashion, you are perceiving time in said linear fashion. Even if it is an illusion, you are still perceiving it. You still experience time, therefor it exists, real or not. Since you can only perceive this illusion, it is your reality. Your reality is a temporally based one. Time waits for no one. Causality demands it.
This post was written at 9:03 Eastern standard Tribe.
Originally posted by blue bird
But NOW is exactly the biggest problem.
You see you can not ever experience 'now' - it has no duration whatsoever.
Originally posted by StellarX
You are in fact arguing that no trees could be falling because there you refuse to believe there is a forest.
Originally posted by BlaznRob
Unless you are something other than Human, I'm going to have to call BS. You're arguing physics from a metaphysical, philosophical standpoint. The OP disregards every measurable and verifiable source as "un-enlightened," while providing no mathmatics or physics to PROVE their claims.
This post reminds me of a poster named AlienAgenda, who'd swear he was connected to some sort of alien data-stream, and that the rest of humanity would soon "wake up" once their vibration levels increased sufficiently.
Wild claims were made, but in the end, the Moderators shut the thread down, after dozens of pages of posts, because he couldn't pony up any PROOF.
Here's a quick question. If I always live in the now, and there is no past or future, then why do I perceive myself and those around me aging? Is it because I expect to age?
What of the tree which knows nothing of aging, and yet still grows? The mind is removed from the vegetable kingdom, and yet growth still occurs without perception.
And actually, there's some very good science now that says the Universe DID begin, or at least, ours did, because we can trace back the background radiation to a specific point of reference (ie: a beginning)
The question comes up "What was there before the Universe, and whats on the edges of the universe? Well... each time we are able to look father out, we realize we're smaller than we've previously thought.
Once, the Earth was all that was. Then we knew of the other planets, and we expanded our belief to the Solar System, then the Galaxy, then our Galaxy Cluster, and now we believe we've got it under controll with "The Universe"
If we're ever able to travel the incredible distances involved, I'd be willing to bet that, just with the vast distances involved between galaxies within our "universe," that there are probably many "universes" out there in the unimaginable vastness of *existance*.
energy and time are linked this way. the more energy i use the quicker i get there. how do i measure how quick?? "the human concept of time as an illusion" thats stupid. 3:00 could be 3:15 at a metres distance on the amount of energy i use.
This is not all true. You can get to the same point faster while "using less energy". You see, every thing is energy and it is only energy traveling through its self, when this is introduced and applied to "science" we will see a change in Earth technology matching that of imagination.
How is it humanly possible in this 'era' to use Less energy and reach a certain distance or destination quickly.. what form or energy are we humanly capable of doing this? The amount of energy we do expel does propel us easier but we haven't got the sufficient power or source to do so using a small amount...
Originally posted by Risingson
Yes, some stars are dead and the light is still travelling to us. If energy is constant then the stars wouldn't die out.
Without using a human perception these events didn't occur without time and without time the perceptions of our own lives wouldnt exist.
Becuase the perceptions of these events have taken place, not continually happening in another dimension. If time didn't exist, neither would our perceptions. It takes our human perceptions to question the existence of our lives.
These perceptions are not continous and there energy is not continous either. After they die out the memory lives but not the thing itself.
Memory as a perception is a way of measuring time. Without time existing, neither would your memories, the stars shining or the objects in front of you.
--Well This is the great debate ,just because we say we can measure "time" by creating a clock does not mean anything.Sure there is motion,changes,event and distance,it is all pure movement,nothing more,no time just the now.Think about the traditional clock with "hands" the hour,minute and second hand is constantly moving around in a circle just moving,motion nothing more.This does not prove measuring real time.this only proves everything is always moving in the now.Also I just read this at top of page.....
"After the death of this bodily form the energy/make up that was the body will rot in to the Earth (or whatever is chosen to do with the body) and the energy of that body will transmutate in to soil and/or food for other creatures, in turn becoming a part of those creatures, and the soil may nurture a tree one day, in turn making you a part of that tree and that tree a part of you. Imagine this process with no beginning and no end and you will realize that you have been every where forever and you are the sempiternal energy. It's an ubiquitous pulchritude. Death is the illusion as is birth."