Get Smart! Epispde 52

a reply to: twitchy

Bush never admitted that explosives were planted in the WTC buildings.

a reply to: twitchy

The 'money' she received from the Iraqis that they tried to charge her for was for two dinners with Iraqi delegates, which was well within her job description, totaling around 90 bucks. That's how trumped her charges were.

Susan Lindauer was a metal case. Case in point.

Susan Lindauer: Unfit To Stand Trial

Judge Mukasey had earlier said that Ms. Lindauer was “seriously disturbed” and that even antipsychotic medication might not make her fit to stand trial.

Judge Preska also cited Ms. Lindauer’s behavior in court last year, when, after being admonished not to speak without first consulting with her lawyer, she stuffed tissues in her mouth.

That was “not the response of someone rationally connected to the proceedings,” Judge Preska said.

www.nytimes.com...

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Looking at the records, they dropped the charges because she was unfit to stand trial.

Looking at the records, judge Michael B. Mukasey was a Bush croney who almost had a CIA asset and 9/11 whistleblower medically lobotomized over a 90 dollar dinner tab and 'secret charges'.

a reply to: twitchy

Looking at the records, judge Michael B. Mukasey was a Bush croney who almost had a CIA asset and 9/11 whistleblower medically lobotomized over a 90 dollar dinner tab and 'secret charges'.

Evidence please, because others have cited her as a mental case as well. After all, for someone to push disinformation that the WTC buildings were loaded with thermite and then, throw in nukes, pretty much sums it up that she was not the right state of mind to stand trial.

a reply to: skyeagle409
A trumped up trial after months of imprisonment and a lot of fancy and arguably very convenient new Patriot Act stipulations that would freak George Orwell out all the while under the constant threat of being 'medicated' despite your own substantial evidence of competence for doing your job in the first place... You can imagine the stress.
Evidence? Sure, Knock yourself out. I've already posted a video, which you apparently haven't seen yet as Ms. Lindauer says pretty clearly that it was her handler that told her about the fallout concerns.

a reply to: twitchy

Fix your link please..

a reply to: twitchy

Whether the charges were false or not, it was determined that she was mentally unfit to stand trial.

a reply to: twitchy

I've already posted a video, which you apparently haven't seen yet as Ms. Lindauer says pretty clearly that it was her handler that told her about the fallout concerns.

Was her handler referring to nukes or to the depleted uranium counterweights? Now, let's take a look here.

Her contact told her that the Trade Towers were packed with thermite bombs, which create molten steel as they bring down a building, by cutting the steel girders just like a hot knife through butter. Any building that is thermited comes straight down at free fall speed, because there is nothing holding it up anymore, and that is exactly what happened on 9/11.

Thermite does not generate radioactive fallout nor is thermite used by demolition companies to demolish tall buildings. Why pack a building with thermite if you are going to demolish the building with nukes?

To sum it up, It is very clear why a determination was made that she was unfit to stand trial.

originally posted by: skyeagle409Thermite does not generate radioactive fallout nor is thermite used by demolition companies to demolish tall buildings.

You're right it doesn't, and no they don't use it to demolish tall buildings. That's a strawman, and a poorly constructed one at that. You've still apparently not seen her interview yet as she doesn't speak in the third person... again, she said her handler was the one that told her about the fallout concerns. You're aware of her own psychiatric evaluations that pretty clearly show she was mentally competent?
Do you think it is normal for the US Government to incarcerate and charge their own intelligence assets for 90 dollar dinner tabs?

a reply to: twitchy

You're right it doesn't, and no they don't use it to demolish tall buildings. That's a strawman, and a poorly constructed one at that.

Thermite is well-known for generating bright flashes of light, but do you see such bright flashes of light in the WTC videos?

You've still apparently not seen her interview yet as she doesn't speak in the third person... again, she said her handler was the one that told her about the fallout concerns.

Who was her handler? Fallout can be carried aloft for long distances, and in fact, fallout is how the Soviets first nuclear blast was detected and yet, there was no evidence of radioactive fallout during 9/11. In fact, fallout from Chinese nuclear test have even reached the West Coast of the United States.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: twitchy

You're right it doesn't, and no they don't use it to demolish tall buildings. That's a strawman, and a poorly constructed one at that.

Thermite is well-known for generating bright flashes of light, but do you see such bright flashes of light in the WTC videos?

You've still apparently not seen her interview yet as she doesn't speak in the third person... again, she said her handler was the one that told her about the fallout concerns.

Who was her handler? Fallout can be carried aloft for long distances, and in fact, fallout is how the Soviets first nuclear blast was detected and yet, there was no evidence of radioactive fallout during 9/11. In fact, fallout from Chinese nuclear test have even reached the West Coast of the United States.

I don't know of any flashes of light that are visible through concrete and steel, I assume you would know that, or is the question rhetorical?

For pete's sake man, watch the video. She tells you the name of her handler and I've always hated doing other peoples homework for them. There's a wealth of evidence of radioactive fallout...
donaldfox.wordpress.com...
Not to mention that the cleanup procedures employed at ground zero, I.e. spreading wet sand, hosing down with water, requiring the removal of clothing and the like, that is pretty standard radioactive decontamination protocols.

a reply to: twitchy

I don't know of any flashes of light that are visible through concrete and steel, I assume you would know that, or is the question rhetorical?

WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 had windows?

a reply to: skyeagle409

I don't know much about construction, do you put those window things on girders and columns?

a reply to: twitchy

Thermite reactions within the WTC buildings would have been noticeable in the windows.

a reply to: skyeagle409
Through all the concrete, all the walls and doors, black smoke, no I'm sorry, that's a ridiculous contention.
But it brings up another great point, it was indeed visible in a few places...
pouring out of the side for instance...
truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com...
Unless your one of those that is still trying to claim that is a reflection on the dark side of a building.

a reply to: twitchy

Through all the concrete, all the walls and doors, black smoke, no I'm sorry, that's a ridiculous contention.

Since you can see fires raging within the WTC buildings, thermite reactions would have been clearly visible through the windows as well.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: twitchy
Since you can see fires raging within the WTC buildings, thermite reactions would have been clearly visible through the windows as well.

This is a lot like having gum stuck to my shoe or something... I'll say it again.

Through all the concrete, all the walls and doors, black smoke, no I'm sorry, that's a ridiculous contention.

No you aren't going to see through a window, then through concrete unless you either use a Marvel Comic Book Hero or X-Rays.

a reply to: twitchy

No you aren't going to see through a window,...

Thermite reactions would have been clearly visible in the windows, but as reality has it, Steven Jones and Richard Gage lied about thermite at ground zero.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Again, I don't know much about construction, do windows look through an entire building, or just to the walls of the office they are located in? I was looking out my window just now and I didn't see a single 2x4 in the back room... Odd. Ridiculous contentions aside though, you don't have to look through the windows and into the concrete subflooring with XRays to see a thermitic reaction, it's pouring out of it's own accord.
truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com...

originally posted by: skyeagle409
If you are not knowledgeable enough on a certain subject, it is best to remain quiet rather than to post from a position of weakness.

I have found one of your 'contentions' I do agree with however.

a reply to: twitchy

Again, I don't know much about construction, do windows look through an entire building, or just to the walls of the office they are located in?

The claim has been made that thermite was used to bring down the WTC buildings, but if you take a close look at the collapse of WTC 2, you can see fires raging and you will also notice that not one single steel column is being cut and in addition, there are no bright flashes of light prior to the collapse of WTC 2.