Get Smart! Epispde 52

a reply to: skyeagle409

It is a fact that demolition explosives do not eject huge steel columns hundreds of feet because the job of explosives during demolition operations is to simply push steel columns to one side after the cutter charges have done their jobs.

That is true in most cases, however we nor you do not know what kind of explosives that were used to bring down the WTC.

I am assuming after that phone call was made, and all the nightly activity going on around the WTC for several weeks, it is assumed that the government wanted this event to be as big as possibly for their SHOCK and AH.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

We know that what he heard had nothing to do with explosives, which has been confirmed by the overwhelming evidence against demolition explosives.

What part of...

What was it he heard ?? nothing, this conversation took place long before 911, do you read what people post, I'll say no you do not.

Do you not understand..??

a reply to: skyeagle409

What he thought were explosives.

Your not being honest here, he clearly stated he knew.

a reply to: skyeagle409

This video of one of the 9/11 hijackers prove otherwise.

Your moving the goal post.

We are discussing the WTC demise.

a reply to: Informer1958

That is true in most cases, however we nor you do not know what kind of explosives that were used to bring down the WTC.

Have you ever seen a video of a steel framed building withstanding the shockwaves of a nuclear detonation? I have.

Using the following photo, explain why steel columns were not ejected despite the fact the building was struck by five huge JDAM bombs.

Photo: Bombed Building Remains Standing

.

a reply to: skyeagle409

You should read what was given to you, the man made this statement way before 911 happened.

All the way down to the floor. I knew that we had to certify these commutators to be able to operate continuously for 50 years without service or repair as our part of the contract. He explained that as the buildings are being built, explosive charges are being incorporated into the structures at key floor joint locations. So, that when the first charges are set-off at the top floors, they will take that floor down to the next. And the charges at that floor will take it down to the next floor. This will continue all the way down. The Twin Towers will come straight down like a stack of pancakes. When the buildings get old and no longer useful or profitable to have and maintain, all it will take is a phone call to take them down.

a reply to: Informer1958

Apparently, he was one of 19 hijackers that nations around the world had warned the United States about prior to 9/11.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Have you ever seen a video of a steel framed building withstanding the shockwaves of a nuclear detonation? I have.

Tell us ,where and when..

==============

and.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

The reason for the ejections can be explained using the laws of physics that has nothing to do with explosives.




Really, I'm listening.. even thou your talking to the wrong person again..


I am waiting for your answer.. why are you stalling..

a reply to: Informer1958

From you link.

All the way down to the floor. I knew that we had to certify these commutators to be able to operate continuously for 50 years without service or repair as our part of the contract. He explained that as the buildings are being built, explosive charges are being incorporated into the structures at key floor joint locations.

That never happened. There are people known as building inspectors who would have noticed the explosives.

a reply to: wildb

You can find it in old nuclear test videos. I am very sure that if you google, you will find the videos.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

You can find it in old nuclear test videos. I am very sure that if you google, you will find the videos.

You said you did, videos don't count, I can't say I saw the towers come down because I was not there.

Now are you going to answer my question or not, if not you have no case..

a reply to: skyeagle409

That never happened. There are people known as building inspectors who would have noticed the explosives.

Absolutely, not. I am sure and would bet my life on it, that these explosions were well hidden from public view and I guess you forgot how the inspectors were bought off by the NYC Mob.

a reply to: Informer1958

Why of course I am right, ask any building inspector.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Why of course I am right, ask any building inspector.

I have and they all disagree with you.

Some of them that I asked refuse to make any comment about the subject, in fear of losing their jobs.

But the one's that did comment did not agree with the OS at all.

a reply to: Informer1958

I have and they all disagree with you.

Some of them that I asked refuse to make any comment about the subject, in fear of losing their jobs.

But the one's that did comment did not agree with the OS at all.

The buildings would have been inspected as progress continued throughout the construction process as in the case during jet engine buildups, and there was no way to keep all of those workers quiet. No such evidence was ever found.

a reply to: skyeagle409

The buildings would have been inspected as progress continued throughout the construction process as in the case during jet engine buildups, and there was no way to keep all of those workers quiet. No such evidence was ever found.

SkepticOverlord made a post in the other thread that will answer your question that the inspectors were paid off and in some cases the Mob threaten to harm the inspectors families.

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: Informer1958
Interestingly the fist tower to fall, fell after 55 minutes after being struck, there was not enough heat that could have weakened the steel since the WTC steel was tested to handle 2500 degrees for several hours before the steel would weaken.

There is a great deal of information to cast doubt on the statement that I bolded above.

As I've stated several times in the past, the New York Times ran an exposé on the substandard construction taking place at the WTC construction site, from 1968/9 to 1970, and again in 1971. All the construction firms were owned by organized crime, and the NYC building inspector's office was rampant with corruption.

There is online information about this, and a building inspector's whistle-blower who was eventually hushed-up.
Carlos Gambino-Masterminds of WTC Collapse
The World Trade Center towers had substandard construction: the real scandal of the collapses
$ELLING OUT THE INVESTIGATION

Unfortunately, since it doesn't support their narrative, those proposing that something other than the impact of passenger airlines and subsequent fires caused the collapse, continue to ignore this crucial information.

Read the sources that SkepticOverlord gave, they are quite compelling.

a reply to: Informer1958

Where does it say that building inspectors allowed the emplacement of explosives within the WTC buildings?

originally posted by: skyeagle409
The United States had no ties to Osama bin Laden

While true only in the sense of being a technicality, it's been widely known and accepted (through FOIA documents) that Osama Bin Laden's "handle" within the CIA was Tim Osman, and that Osman was indeed a CIA asset.

Osama/Osman's activities and involvement with the CIA after playing a role in the Pakistani ISI funneling of men and money to the Mujahideen is often difficult to trace. However, there are credible reports of Osman and CIA field agents spending time together in a Swiss hospital, in 1999.

Stating there have been no ties is simply ignoring known history.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Where does it say that building inspectors allowed the emplacement of explosives within the WTC buildings?

It doesn't, they may have never seen them.

And if they did see them they knew to stay quit about it. Their lives depended on it

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: skyeagle409

You should read what was given to you, the man made this statement way before 911 happened.

Anyone who made or believes that stupid claim has no idea explosives have a shelf life!