And Here Come the Excuses!!

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: DBCowboy

I know. But how is that different from being the system's weak little bitch which also doesn't change anything?

Shooting a man in the back is what a weak coward does.

If you want to celebrate a weak coward, then you do you, boo.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Deliberately misconstruing what I stated doesn't invalidate my simple point.

Boo.

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

So what would be an example of strength?

If that's a serious question, then you are the poster child for what is wrong with society today, whether you live in the US or somewhere else.

If I'm not mistaken, you're from Canada where your 'governor of the State' has no spine and is a complete jack-ass loser. No worries though, ATS will still love ya' all the same! Maybe not me, but that's a different post.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

So then you can't give me a straight answer

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

So then you can't give me a straight answer

Nor can you, to my assertion.

So yeah.

Oh, but if you want an answer...then this guy should have signed up with the millions of others who feel like UHC is a criminal enterprise and gone through the proper legal system to bring them to justice. You don't just go murdering people, cuz that's what you feel like doing today. Does this answer your question???

ETA - BTW, you should know by now, I'm the wrong person to ask for a direct answer, because I always have one! Every time.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

So then you can't give me a straight answer

Nor can you, to my assertion.

So yeah.

Oh, but if you want an answer...then this guy should have signed up with the millions of others who feel like UHC is a criminal enterprise and gone through the proper legal system to bring them to justice.

You mean the two- tiered, weaponized, corrupted legal system? That one? Got it.

No, I'm not Canadian.

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: DBCowboy

Deliberately misconstruing what I stated doesn't invalidate my simple point.

Boo.

Sure, back-peddle and support a coward.

Why not chant "eat the rich" while you're at it!

a reply to: DBCowboy

What makes his cowardice (revolting against the machine) different than your cowardice (placating the machine) if both options achieve the same result? (No change in the machine)

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: DBCowboy

What makes his cowardice (revolting against the machine) different than your cowardice (placating the machine) if both options achieve the same result? (No change in the machine)

Who says any of us placate?

We fight, sometimes we win, sometimes we lose.

You seem to think we're all cowards to the system and the only brave one shot an unarmed man in the back.

It says more about you than myself.

Now I saw today some clown of a neurosurgeon was on talking about how his back pain could have lead him to this poin.

B please...lot of military folks with back issues we arent all out there assassinating people, stop excuses bad behavior. Hes internet famous now... hope he enjoys prison.

originally posted by: cherokeetroy

No, I'm not Canadian.

You are an online warrior...lol

a reply to: DBCowboy

I would say it's placation if you admit to being screwed by an entity but then go on to defend the entity that's screwing you.

I plainly said the shooter's actions were futile. Violent rebellion isn't the answer but unresistant submission and blind obedience isn't the solution, either.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: cherokeetroy

No, I'm not Canadian.

You are an online warrior...lol

So what? You're online, too. If I stand in opposition to your ideas then I'm a "warrior". So what do you call yourself and everyone who thinks and posts like you do?

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: DBCowboy

I would say it's placation if you admit to being screwed by an entity but then go on to defend the entity that's screwing you.

I plainly said the shooter's actions were futile. Violent rebellion isn't the answer but unresistant submission and blind obedience isn't the solution, either.

Who says any of us are obedient?

Just because we didn't cowardly shoot an unarmed man in the back?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: DBCowboy

I would say it's placation if you admit to being screwed by an entity but then go on to defend the entity that's screwing you.

I plainly said the shooter's actions were futile. Violent rebellion isn't the answer but unresistant submission and blind obedience isn't the solution, either.

Who says any of us are obedient

Attitude has a lot to do with it. Like I said:

"I would say it's placation if you admit to being screwed by an entity but then go on to defend the entity that's screwing you."

Defending your abuser is a clear indication.

originally posted by: cherokeetroy

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: DBCowboy

I would say it's placation if you admit to being screwed by an entity but then go on to defend the entity that's screwing you.

I plainly said the shooter's actions were futile. Violent rebellion isn't the answer but unresistant submission and blind obedience isn't the solution, either.

Who says any of us are obedient

Attitude has a lot to do with it. Like I said:

"I would say it's placation if you admit to being screwed by an entity but then go on to defend the entity that's screwing you."

Defending your abuser is a clear indication.

Being against cowardly attacks is defending my abusers.

Do you write for MSNBC or are you CNN?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: cherokeetroy

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: DBCowboy

I would say it's placation if you admit to being screwed by an entity but then go on to defend the entity that's screwing you.

I plainly said the shooter's actions were futile. Violent rebellion isn't the answer but unresistant submission and blind obedience isn't the solution, either.

Who says any of us are obedient

Attitude has a lot to do with it. Like I said:

"I would say it's placation if you admit to being screwed by an entity but then go on to defend the entity that's screwing you."

Defending your abuser is a clear indication.

Do you write for MSNBC or are you CNN?

If I believe humans are slaves to a corrupt system and you presume that stance to be liberal ideology, then wouldn't the logical conclusion be that you disagree with my belief? In other words, the system isn't broken in your opinion, therefore, people need to be obedient to its laws?

originally posted by: cherokeetroy

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

So then you can't give me a straight answer

Nor can you, to my assertion.

So yeah.

Oh, but if you want an answer...then this guy should have signed up with the millions of others who feel like UHC is a criminal enterprise and gone through the proper legal system to bring them to justice.

You mean the two- tiered, weaponized, corrupted legal system? That one? Got it.

You meant he one that the dems use to make money hand over fist and to combat their political opponents because they have no real way to beat them in reality?

The one that will only change if people stand up to make it change instead of bypassing it completely and then wonder why they get railroaded in the end.

a reply to: cherokeetroy

I go out and volunteer. I would hope that is better than shooting a man in cold blood in the back.

There is nothing stopping people from donating or starting charities.

I think the true problem with the left is they think it should always be someone else’s money. But the left, or its leaders, shown from Covid, to FEMA, to BLM corruption, to the Ukraine they don’t care how they line the pockets of their crony capitalist buddies.

a reply to: cherokeetroy

A billion donated to get Harris elected, and try to keep a corrupt administration in office. But nothing for the peasants. Huh.