Uk Govt sending staff and recruiting for people to campaign for Harris in the US

a reply to: network dude

And if Trump brought over some members of the Russian Delegation to assist in his re-election efforts, that would also be cheered by the left? Or would there be investigations and impeachments? be honest.

Trumps the puppet, not the puppeteer!!

a reply to: Freeborn
I think now I know why the dod updated that military authorization to kill american citizens, it was clearly done as a loyalty oath to the royal family to protect agents of foreign governments while they interfere with the american presidential election.

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: Freeborn
I think now I know why the dod updated that military authorization to kill american citizens, it was clearly done as a loyalty oath to the royal family to protect agents of foreign governments while they interfere with the american presidential election.

You've posted in enough of RussianTrolls' threads to know us Brits' still rule America along with the rest of the world!!!!

I may not totally agree with this but these people are unpayed volunteers.....

www.dailymail.co.uk...

But his reply was quickly met with a humiliating community note stating that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) explicitly permits foreign nationals to serve as campaign volunteers.

The FEC, which regulates US elections, states that foreign volunteers are not allowed to donate money to campaigns or spend money on their behalf, nor can they 'participate in the decision-making process' but they may, however, participate in activities as an 'uncompensated volunteer'.

Obama did exactly the same during Brexit. Went down like a lead balloon over here.

a reply to: solar1

It didn't work!

a reply to: worldstarcountry

Wow.

Bit of a stretch, there?

Why are you so obsessed with our Royal Family?

a reply to: Kurokage

Are they using their own funds for transportation, food, lodging, expenses? I don't know, and you don't either. Maybe that should be investigated.

a reply to: Kurokage

Trumps the puppet, not the puppeteer!!

No one trys to kill a puppet to assist in an election.

So you're just wrong.

So, let's play this out logically...


The term "Grassroots" that the Liberals have used for many decades is just a code word for ballot harvesting. This is what they do, and they are good at it. The main reason is that they own the big cities, and the density of the population allows them to harvest many ballots. We saw the mule film where one person can be seen dumping 20+ ballots over and over. Not hard to do when people live so close together and everyone gets a ballot in the mail.

Now compared to Republicans who tend to live farther apart, and so one would need to drive a good deal to visit 100 houses whereas in a Dense population, you could have 100s on one small block with tall apartment buildings.

So it is one of the Liberal's strongest tools, so let's look at key State to see if it is actually legal.

Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania law allows only a voter to return their absentee ballot.

I would be out in force looking for people with more than one ballot.

North Carolina
North Carolina law states that a near relative or legal guardian may return a voter's absentee ballot. It is a class I felony for anyone else to return absentee ballots on behalf of others.

Same here, find them, citizen arrest the crap out of them.

Virginia
Virginia law allows anyone to return an absentee ballot to a drop-off location.

This is discerning though it is a Blue state. The Republican Governor here has been working hard to prevent fraud though which the Libs have been screaming bloody murder on including here on ATS. I live in Virginia and there is no such thing as illegals getting to vote so that is good.

Georgia
In Georgia, a voted absentee ballot may be returned by a family member (defined by the law) or a household member. Voted absentee ballots of voters confined to a hospital or with a physical disability may also be returned by a caregiver.

Read the law here.

Once again very limited, so get out there and hunt them down.

Arizona
Arizona permits a family member, household member, or caregiver to return a voter's absentee ballot. It establishes the collection of early ballots by anyone outside those groups as a class 6 felony.

The state has tightened things up a good deal.

Michigan
Michigan law permits a household member or a family member (defined by law), or an election official if those options are not available, to return a voter's absentee ballot.

Good

Nevada
In Nevada, a person authorized by the voter may return a mail ballot at the request of a voter.

I don't see Trump taking NV unless it is a landslide since they can harvest like crazy there.

Wisconsin
In Wisconsin, only the voter may return their absentee ballot.

Let's get some arrests!

Minnesota
In Minnesota, a designated agent can return absentee ballots on behalf of not more than three voters. State law establishes that tampering with a ballot or failing to immediately deliver the ballot is a misdemeanor.

They will harvest like crazy here...

I would love to get James O'Keefe on this British thing and slip in a cute Brit who works for him in the mix, and see what they do.

originally posted by: yeahright
a reply to: Kurokage

Are they using their own funds for transportation, food, lodging, expenses? I don't know, and you don't either. Maybe that should be investigated.

Maybe take the time to read the articles, then you'd know. I do know as I've already read them!

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Labour activists who want to help with the Harris campaign have been told they will need to pay for their own flights and car hire, but that Democrat volunteers would provide accommodation. Any staff intending to travel are expected to book annual leave for the duration of their trip.

a reply to: Kurokage

That tells me nothing. You want to swallow what you're told when it follows the narrative you prefer. You read stuff they told you. Nothing to see here.

Figures.

a reply to: Astrocometus

No one trys to kill a puppet to assist in an election.

So you're just wrong.

You're not making sense!!!
Try re-reading my reply.

If Russians were sent to assist, they'd be here to control the Trump puppet....

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: network dude

And if Trump brought over some members of the Russian Delegation to assist in his re-election efforts, that would also be cheered by the left? Or would there be investigations and impeachments? be honest.

Trumps the puppet, not the puppeteer!!

it has #all to do with Trump. It's the idea of foreign influence in US elections that is unpalatable. I am aware our CIA does it all the time, but they are nice enough to hid it from more folks. These idiots are broadcasting it.

so would you be cool with members of the Taliban helping Boris Johnson with his next re-election bid? Or would that be far enough out of the ordinary to question things?

originally posted by: yeahright
a reply to: Kurokage

That tells me nothing. You want to swallow what you're told when it follows the narrative you prefer. You read stuff they told you. Nothing to see here.

Figures.

It's the news article thats been reported on by many. All media leans one way or another but at some point you have just post an article and make of it what you will. If you can't do that, maybe thats your problem. I can see you've already tried to label me, and It appears you've already swollowed the narative of 'political influence' from the narrative you prefer?

The labour members who've decided to join the democrat campaign would need to report any finacial benefits recieved or given. The US has similar laws.
Both parties on both sides of the pond have been doing this for years, I find it suprising that Americans have been blind to this for so many years?? But dementia Don supporters do look for any excuse for his failings I suppose...

a reply to: network dude

so would you be cool with members of the Taliban helping Boris Johnson with his next re-election bid? Or would that be far enough out of the ordinary to question things?

How ridiculous and such a straw man argument, and this isn't foreign influence as far as I can see, Unless it's the sexy English accent you think will change the America love of coffee for tea!!

We've had this 'special relationship' for years and all parties have 'helped' when they have similar parties in power on both sides of the pond. It goes way back.

a reply to: Kurokage

The labour members who've decided to join the democrat campaign would need to report any finacial benefits recieved or given.
Both parties on both sides of the pond have been doing this for years, I find it suprising that Americans have been blind to this for so many years?? But dementia Don supporters do look for any excuse for his failings I suppose...

They aren't joining any campaign as much as they are banning together
to support their globalist puppeteers agenda.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: network dude

And if Trump brought over some members of the Russian Delegation to assist in his re-election efforts, that would also be cheered by the left? Or would there be investigations and impeachments? be honest.

Trumps the puppet, not the puppeteer!!

it has #all to do with Trump. It's the idea of foreign influence in US elections that is unpalatable. I am aware our CIA does it all the time, but they are nice enough to hid it from more folks. These idiots are broadcasting it.

so would you be cool with members of the Taliban helping Boris Johnson with his next re-election bid? Or would that be far enough out of the ordinary to question things?

A more pertinent example was when dodgy Dave got Obama to come over and threaten us with all sorts if we voted to leave the EU.
Total overreach and he had no business doing it, same as these labour goons have no business going over there campaigning for the Dems.

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: network dude

so would you be cool with members of the Taliban helping Boris Johnson with his next re-election bid? Or would that be far enough out of the ordinary to question things?

How ridiculous and such a straw man argument, and this isn't foreign influence as far as I can see, Unless it's the sexy English accent you think will change the America love of coffee for tea!!

We've had this 'special relationship' for years and all parties have 'helped' when they have similar parties in power on both sides of the pond. It goes way back.

and yet you typed this just up the page a bit:

I may not totally agree with this but these people are unpayed volunteers.....

it seems you see this for what it is, but your TDS might be flaring up a bit.

a reply to: Astrocometus

They aren't joining any campaign as much as they are banning together
to support their globalist puppeteers agenda.

Even though I agee with your opinion on globalism, I find it odd that any American would be against a closer relationship with one of it's closest allies? I also find it very sad that our American members are only just now finding out about this after many years? Have they really been that stupid or blind?

In a world where Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran are banding together and all hope for the fall and demise of America, I'd have thought Americans would be happy to have an ally who's political system is so close that both sides of the aisle seek or offer support to their counters acxross the pond?
As long as it's all above board then let the idiots have their fun. Neither side enjoys politically being looked down upon and this kind of behaviour gives that impression.