The debate. Who wins?

a reply to: spacedoubt

Yay!!

For YOU!

Damn, what an absolute joke.

For a nation that leads in most important industries, it’s an absolute disgrace this is what we have to offer politically.

350m~ people, many of whom shape the global economic landscape, and this is what we offer as leadership.

It’s a disgrace to intellectual thought. The two just leaned into their base or focus group talking points.

In comparison to Bush v Clinton v Perot, we’re a nation of child like infighting. It’s over, any kind of productive debate is taboo. Pick a side or kick rocks.

a reply to: spacedoubt

If Harris "won" the debate, will she do another one?

originally posted by: spacedoubt

originally posted by: nugget1
She's getting under Trump's skin....not good.

Yep, she figured it out.
He’s going into “rally mode” where everyone claps no matter how unhinged he is.
That is, if they don’t yawn and walk out.

His eyes rolled when she teased him about his tiny rallies.

It's so refreshing to see someone whose an open-minded, unbiased truth seeker who doesn't fall for all the propaganda....and a moderatore no less!

originally posted by: spacedoubt

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: spacedoubt

You're biased, heavily, and you've shown it for years.

I, on the other hand, am being objective.

Therefore, your comments are...IGNORED!

I supposed a head in the sand is one option.
We both watched this debate.
If you can even say that the Felon came even close to even BEING AT, the debate. I question this form of objectivity .
The world is laughing at his performance..

Trump really doesn’t say anything.

He talks around a subject with no clear commitment.

It’s a conman’s trick.

originally posted by: spacedoubt

And……..drumroll please.
Taylor Swift just endorsed Harris. lol fwiw.

Cool... She will not do another debate, will not answer any hard questions, and will dip and hide her way to the election, are you happy? Do you really want her to run the country? Do you really want to go to war with Russia, let the border fail, f#ck the economy... Platitude after platitude after slogan was her whole debate and that is the best she can do, all she is.

Kamala walked right into it with the whole “I met with Zelenskyy 3 days before Putin invaded” and Trump caught it and responded perfectly. Trump won for that exchange alone.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: spacedoubt

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: spacedoubt

You're biased, heavily, and you've shown it for years.

I, on the other hand, am being objective.

Therefore, your comments are...IGNORED!

I supposed a head in the sand is one option.
We both watched this debate.
If you can even say that the Felon came even close to even BEING AT, the debate. I question this form of objectivity .
The world is laughing at his performance..

Trump really doesn’t say anything.

He talks around a subject with no clear commitment.

It’s a conman’s trick.

Sounds really familiar.......

Projection too....

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: spacedoubt

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: spacedoubt

You're biased, heavily, and you've shown it for years.

I, on the other hand, am being objective.

Therefore, your comments are...IGNORED!

I supposed a head in the sand is one option.
We both watched this debate.
If you can even say that the Felon came even close to even BEING AT, the debate. I question this form of objectivity .
The world is laughing at his performance..

Trump really doesn’t say anything.

He talks around a subject with no clear commitment.

It’s a conman’s trick.

Sounds really familiar.......

Projection too....

a reply to: RazorV66

And it’s absolutely laughable that they can’t see the bias.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: nugget1

yea I turned it off, I havent drank nearly enough to listen to either one of them.

I did, and you can stick a fork in me now.

Good night.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: spacedoubt

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: spacedoubt

You're biased, heavily, and you've shown it for years.

I, on the other hand, am being objective.

Therefore, your comments are...IGNORED!

I supposed a head in the sand is one option.
We both watched this debate.
If you can even say that the Felon came even close to even BEING AT, the debate. I question this form of objectivity .
The world is laughing at his performance..

Trump really doesn’t say anything.

He talks around a subject with no clear commitment.

It’s a conman’s trick.

Jesus Christ.

Harris did that all night.

She has had 3.5 years in charge, why wasn't anything done?

Wake the F up.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

In comparison to Bush v Clinton v Perot, we’re a nation of child like infighting. It’s over, any kind of productive debate is taboo. Pick a side or kick rocks.

I voted for Perot.

Those were better times.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Dude! You really already know this answer don't you????

Of course he does!! He's one of the low-information types!

Sign up for free stuff, regardless of who pays for it!

Would you expect anything else? I mean, seriously, I've seen it for going on 11 years.

a reply to: spacedoubt

So why not fact check Kamala?

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: spacedoubt

So why not fact check Kamala?

PERISH the thought!!!!!

NEVER!!!

Reading all the comments here, I don't think I want to even watch the debate tomorrow. Kamala did better than I thought she would...not good, but better than I expected. Trump was getting riled up having to put up with the moderator who was coming after him more than Harris was....Is that normal?

I am going to vote for Trump because I do know the Democrats in politics lie so much and do things without thinking of consequences which hurts a lot of working class people in this country. They need to learn to think better. After all, they could not even tell Joe had dementia and called everyone stating the obvious conspiracy theorists and maga supporters. Or even white supremists or domestic terrorists.

I was kind of irked at what the moderator was doing too, that is not their job to side with one side of the debate.

Remember everyone...Kamala stated she is not coming after anyone's guns, she owns guns and so does her VP. It does not say what type of guns though, maybe they don't own semi-automatics...oh hell, politicians lie all the time. NM.

a reply to: Annee

Agreed, and did you hear Harris say the word plan a zillion times ... I think she might have a plan.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

It’s a disgrace to intellectual thought. The two just leaned into their base or focus group talking points.

Honestly, I think it’s probably the only way to debate Trump.

You’re debating a personality — not a learned politician.

It was more of out con the con — then a real debate of issues.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Xtrozero

Dude! You really already know this answer don't you????

Of course he does!! He's one of the low-information types!

Sign up for free stuff, regardless of who pays for it!

Would you expect anything else? I mean, seriously, I've seen it for going on 11 years.

I wish I was low information voter. I could be blissfully unaware…

It’s painful knowing the truth and watching what’s happening to our country.