Unbelievable statements by Tim Walz's wife

originally posted by: Sisavran
Want to know what’s really unbelievable?
The fact that the MSM and big tech successfully has the US populace almost completely off the Trump Assassination

oops wrong place

originally posted by: Sisavran
You do understand that pretty much every single MSM news network, local networks, and independent journalists all have X accounts and post there regularly to get their stories out asap right?

Your ignorance is showing and seems to be the only thing that needs humoring.
a reply to: quintessentone

I want more than one source to go on, so where are all these other newsworthy sources that double down on that story...and it has to be an independent source. Anyone?

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: Sisavran
Want to know what’s really unbelievable?
The fact that the MSM and big tech successfully has the US populace almost completely off the Trump Assassination

X "IS" the source! The place where the original comments were left.

Are you retarded?

I want more sources from independent media. Anyone?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
a reply to: quintessentone

You've disproved nothing.
The tweets speak for themselves.

Find another source then. I'll wait.

Wait all you want...and use the time to disprove my posts.

Thought so, you got nothing.

Shown factual evidence - proclaims "you got nothing"

What a clown

I need other sources besides X, why not humor me?

I’m with you.

I want legitimate news source and author of article — so as to research their history and slant.

X is a dump all site IMO.

Of course “everyone” uses it — but I’m not willing to sort through “everyone”.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
a reply to: quintessentone

You've disproved nothing.
The tweets speak for themselves.

Find another source then. I'll wait.

Wait all you want...and use the time to disprove my posts.

Thought so, you got nothing.

Shown factual evidence - proclaims "you got nothing"

What a clown

I need other sources besides X, why not humor me?

X "IS" the source! The actual place where the actual original comments were posted.

Are you retarded?

Are you saying that Ashli Babbitt was a domestic terrorist?
Ashli Babbitts first lawsuit hearing happened 3 days ago

reply to: quintessentone

a reply to: underpass61

You need sources to interpret the evidence for you in a way that your brain can handle.

SAD!

Oh come on she’s not weird, just (D)ifferent. Transed criminal into political being. She just wants to read stories to kids. Give her/him/they a break. Don’t judge.

Oh boy, big surprise, here comes the hypocritical lying peanut gallery!

a reply to: Annee

a reply to: underpass61

So you know it was her account actually verified? There's currently a "WalzWin" account that oddly has a Trump @name and is posting nonsense. If I post that here, should you just accept it? Because it's a "walzwin" account?

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
a reply to: quintessentone

You've disproved nothing.
The tweets speak for themselves.

Find another source then. I'll wait.

Wait all you want...and use the time to disprove my posts.

Thought so, you got nothing.

Shown factual evidence - proclaims "you got nothing"

What a clown

I need other sources besides X, why not humor me?

X "IS" the source! The actual place where the actual original comments were posted.

Are you retarded?

How convenient — and lazy.

originally posted by: Sisavran
Are you saying that Ashli Babbitt was a domestic terrorist?
Ashli Babbitts first lawsuit hearing happened 3 days ago

reply to: quintessentone

Trespasser and a victim of circumstance but ultimately circumstances she helped create and escalate so again, a trespasser. I sympathize but can't condone her actions anymore than I sympathize with George Floyd and can't condone his. Both of them should have stayed home and they would be alive today. Also known as, FAFO.

I literally just explained to you that X is not a singular source but multiple in one convenient place.
Just because it’s not the echo chamber you want it to be it upsets you.
Community notes also help with what you are talking about taking any wind out of your sails for this argument
a reply to: quintessentone

A trespasser huh?
Mind telling us the location she was at when she was shot?
a reply to: TzarChasm

originally posted by: ColeYounger2
a reply to: quintessentone

At least she's not being labelled, 'creepy' weird as Vance is now.

Keeping your windows open "for as long as possible" during a riot so you can smell the burning tires isn't creepy?

Not when democrats are doing it. Just like you'd never hear quint admit the racism from the democrats when they call black republicans racial slurs. You know how they roll, rules for thee and not for me.

a reply to: Sisavran

Easy. A restricted government building that was first gained entry by a line of Proud Boys pushing against the police line, then Domenic Pezzola broke a window, climbed through, then opened the door allowing the crowd in. While other "Patriots" were also breaking doors and windows, and fighting cops to gain access.

originally posted by: quintessentone
I need other sources besides X, why not humor me?

You want sources about X posts that come from sources other than X????
You are flailing and it's embarrassing to watch.

originally posted by: quintessentone
The J6 domestic terrorists were not dismissed.

Yeah ... 'terrorists' ... who were calmly walked by Capitol police through the chambers to go sit in Nancy Pelosi's chair. Pffft. The absurdity of it knows no bounds.

originally posted by: Annee
How convenient — and lazy.

So quoting the actual source is 'convenient and lazy'??
Not a good look for you anne ... try harder.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: FlyersFan

Even though she never donated to the fund. Link

And bail is only provided to those (who as ats so clearly tells us in the cases of the former President) people who are presumed innocent until trial.

Once convicted of the crime there is no bailing out.

Only one candidate is promising to pardon convicted violent felons. And it's not the current VP and her running mate no matter how you try to spin it.

But get angry over someone who although never said she agreed with rioters, seemed to understand how the situation started with their feeling of distrust/anger.

"convicted violent felons"

EL OH EL!!!

Y'all need new talking points.