It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: quintessentone
when Roe v Wade was overturned states leaders just changed the laws without a vote from the people..
originally posted by: quintessentone
More deflection,
answer Sookie's question.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Does a woman have a constitutional right to use lethal force against a pregnancy, or fetal person, that is threatening her life/limb?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Says the person who thinks our rights are derived from the Constitution.
If you are that demonic and bloodthirsty .. move to France.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
So your answer is "NO", a woman does NOT have a constitutional right to use lethal force against a pregnancy that is killing her, or threatening her life and/or limb.
originally posted by: some_stupid_name
a reply to: quintessentone
The supreme court ruled that the judicial branch did have the proper authority to have made a decision to begin with as it should be left up to the people and the best way to ensure that, is to make it a state by state right so that a single point can't gate keep issue.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: FlyersFan
So your answer is "NO", a woman does NOT have a constitutional right to use lethal force against a pregnancy that is killing her, or threatening her life and/or limb.
Got it! Good to know.
If you are that demonic and bloodthirsty .. move to France.
Good to know also that you want to see a national ban on abortion, without any exceptions for rape, incest or SAVING THE LIFE OF A WOMAN.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
So your answer is "NO", a woman does NOT have a constitutional right to use lethal force against a pregnancy that is killing her, or threatening her life and/or limb.
I said it more than once.
Show me where it says in the Constitution that someone has a Constitutional right to a medical procedure or service that has to be paid for and I'll change my answer.
Good luck with that. No one has a 'right' to a paid for service.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Is the Electric Chair a medical procedure? Is a lethal drug cocktail a medical procedure? Why do states have a constitutional right to kill convicts with these methods?
Sorry Sook, I don't think that made it into the constitution.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
There you go again, asserting your ignorant premise that the US Constitution somehow bestows our inalienable rights by enumerating them, and that if they're not specifically enumerated within the document, they don't exist.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: some_stupid_name
a reply to: quintessentone
The supreme court ruled that the judicial branch did have the proper authority to have made a decision to begin with as it should be left up to the people and the best way to ensure that, is to make it a state by state right so that a single point can't gate keep issue.
Exactly, authority for others to change the laws in mid-stream, authority NOT to the people.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
I asked why they have the Constitutional right to take a life using medical procedures?
originally posted by: some_stupid_name
That is the job of judicial branch, it's how our government works. This is exactly how we like it.
What type of America would you like see?