It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you do not want to listen to alternative information
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: RussianTroll
You think NATO couldn't sink an Icebreaker?
As others have asked, even though you are too "upset" or man enough to speak to me, what defensive capabilities do your "unstoppable" Ice Breakers have?
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: RussianTroll
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: RussianTroll
How is it for taking U.S. and Canadian missiles?
Why would a Russian combat icebreaker be armed with American and Canadian missiles? Russian missiles are more productive, efficient, modern and combat-tested)))
No, I was asking what protective characteristics does it have to be able to take missile fire?
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Kurokage
Some folk don't like alternative information.
Published Jun 19, 2024
Houthi rebels have sunk a ship carrying Russian cargo, maritime authorities have said.
The militants fired three anti-ship ballistic missiles at the vessel, severely damaging the engine. The entire crew was evacuated successfully, officials confirmed.
US forces subsequently destroyed three launchers based in Yemen, as well as an unmanned aerial vehicle launched over the Red Sea.
Everything here is under the radical control of the Russian armed forces)))))
There are no Western analogues to the base in the Arctic and there will not be in the foreseeable future.
Super-duper armed with all conceivable and inconceivable systems of reflection, attacks and destruction.))))
Unlike NATO countries, which build bases on the territory of foreign enslaved countries.