Hey Lefties, can we talk about this yet?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

One, you can now describe a woman (lol) two absolutely.

But the body of the unborn child is actually different.

So much for total freedom.

Thank you for your perspective.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: SomeStupidName

Well, Mr Stupid Name, voting Republican is voting to "sabotage the system", because that exactly what Project 2025 sets out to do.

That's what Steve Bannon and his cohorts are preaching, "TEAR IT ALL DOWN!" They don't think the system is worth saving or fixing. They want to raze it and rebuilt it in their image. MAGA!

PNAC is alive and kicking under pseudonyms.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: SomeStupidName

No Dear, It was over with the Patriot Act. We lost the power of the ballot box with Citizen's United.

Is there any real proof unlimited corporate entity spending really influences Voters?? ❓

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

Who was in charge of their bodies when they got pregnant even though they didn’t want a baby?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

One, you can now describe a woman (lol) two absolutely.

But the body of the unborn child is actually different.

So much for total freedom.

Thank you for your perspective.

Freedom doesn't give you the right to kill humans that are inconvenient.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: SomeStupidName

No Dear, It was over with the Patriot Act. We lost the power of the ballot box with Citizen's United.

Is there any real proof unlimited corporate entity spending really influences Voters?? ❓

Is there any real proof unlimited corporate entity spending on marketing really influences Consumers??

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

One, you can now describe a woman (lol) two absolutely.

But the body of the unborn child is actually different.

So much for total freedom.

Thank you for your perspective.

Freedom doesn't give you the right to kill humans that are inconvenient.

Perspective

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

One, you can now describe a woman (lol) two absolutely.

But the body of the unborn child is actually different.

So much for total freedom.

Thank you for your perspective.

Freedom doesn't give you the right to kill humans that are inconvenient.

Perspective

Objective

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

One, you can now describe a woman (lol) two absolutely.

But the body of the unborn child is actually different.

So much for total freedom.

Thank you for your perspective.

Freedom doesn't give you the right to kill humans that are inconvenient.

Perspective

Objective

Nope. You are making up “rules” you’ve deemed to be correct and expecting everyone else to agree.

Not total freedom.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

One, you can now describe a woman (lol) two absolutely.

But the body of the unborn child is actually different.

So much for total freedom.

Thank you for your perspective.

Freedom doesn't give you the right to kill humans that are inconvenient.

Perspective

Objective

Nope. You are making up “rules” you’ve deemed to be correct and expecting everyone else to agree.

Not total freedom.

That's a lie.

I only advocate, like civil rights folks did, for those who can't speak for themselves.

Freedom.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

One, you can now describe a woman (lol) two absolutely.

But the body of the unborn child is actually different.

So much for total freedom.

Thank you for your perspective.

Freedom doesn't give you the right to kill humans that are inconvenient.

Perspective

Objective

Nope. You are making up “rules” you’ve deemed to be correct and expecting everyone else to agree.

Not total freedom.

That's a lie.

I only advocate, like civil rights folks did, for those who can't speak for themselves.

Freedom.

If you have to put conditions on it — it is not total freedom.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

One, you can now describe a woman (lol) two absolutely.

But the body of the unborn child is actually different.

So much for total freedom.

Thank you for your perspective.

Freedom doesn't give you the right to kill humans that are inconvenient.

Perspective

Objective

Nope. You are making up “rules” you’ve deemed to be correct and expecting everyone else to agree.

Not total freedom.

That's a lie.

I only advocate, like civil rights folks did, for those who can't speak for themselves.

Freedom.

If you have to put conditions on it — it is not total freedom.

There is no "right" nor "freedom" to kill humans.

They had that in slavery.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

The American experiment is over. Like I said; The stage has already been set.

Yeah, we won't go gentle into that dark night, thank you very much.

Oh, so it’s freedom for some eh?

I vote for freedom and rights for all.

Perspective in that statement.

No.

Quite simple.

More freedoms, more rights, less government.

From your perspective.

I’ve disagreed with you many times.

We have different perspectives.

Yes.

You prefer more government and less freedom.

I've always argued on the side of freedom.

Never waivered.

Allowing women full autonomy of their bodies.

One, you can now describe a woman (lol) two absolutely.

But the body of the unborn child is actually different.

So much for total freedom.

Thank you for your perspective.

Freedom doesn't give you the right to kill humans that are inconvenient.

How stunningly ironic!

No, your definition of "freedom" gives you the right to kill certain beings whom are not from your culture or religion, and whom are inconvenient to YOU, because you do not consider them to be "humans". And, you get to do decide this based on some arbitrary categorization (you made up) like eye and hair color.

Hmmm...I wonder who ever did that in the past? I can't imagine.

Do you deny that Israel supported, endorsed and assisted the South African government in shaping World opinions on Apartheid? They did you know. Israel was their chief PR agent.

What you want is "freedom" which is acceptable to YOU. You don't want real freedom. You want freedom on your terms, and only your terms. Every other kind of "freedom" is unacceptable to you.

You have given yourself the authority to group and stereotype people into "acceptable", and "non-humans", and this is your definition of "freedom" for humans.

What you want in Israel, is exactly what Israel tried to convince the World was okay in South Africa. The only difference in Palestine is, these people aren't "black", they're Arabs.

I'm sorry, man, but you've run up against a hard wall here with me. I see ALL people as equal, and in the same breath I know 'some' people will be evil, evil to the core (and they should perish), but I don't believe anyone is allowed to group entire cultural groups into the bucket of the 'bad guys'. You, on the other hand, seemingly have no problem with this. "Kill them ALL seems to be your posture.

Tell me where I am mistaken.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

I have no problem killing Nazi's.

Don't see how you can equivocate them to unborn children.

I support 100% women’s autonomy of her body and reproduction.

You support government control over a woman’s autonomy of her body and reproduction.

a reply to: DBCowboy

who said anything, anything at all, about 'unborn children'???

Is this a pivot, a diversion? Who said anything about unborn children?

originally posted by: Annee

I support 100% women’s autonomy of her body and reproduction.

You support government control over a woman’s autonomy of her body and reproduction.

Nope, I see the unborn human as an individual.

With rights.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: DBCowboy

who said anything, anything at all, about 'unborn children'???

Is this a pivot, a diversion? Who said anything about unborn children?

This drifted to abortion. Keep up.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I have no problem killing Nazi's.

Wow, but in the same breath, you have no problem with Israeli 'Nazis' killing Arabs.

How interesting. How do you defend this statement??

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: DBCowboy

who said anything, anything at all, about 'unborn children'???

Is this a pivot, a diversion? Who said anything about unborn children?

This drifted to abortion. Keep up.

No...YOU drifted it there, because you can't defend your position, so you pivoted to some other diversionary topic.

You keep up!