It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hey Lefties, can we talk about this yet?

page: 24
26
<< 21  22  23    25  26 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 02:09 PM
link   
Lots of people catching the Biden-Kamala scrambled-words syndrome. šŸ’”



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: Annee

I pay taxes for a lot I donā€™t agree with.

Useless argument.



Wrong.

You get pregnant.
You want to slaughter the innocent baby.
YOU PAY FOR IT.
It's not my responsibility.
It's yours.
Grow up and take responsibility for your own actions.
Stop trying to stick everyone else with the financial bill.
That murder is totally on YOU - physically, spiritually and financially.


Talk YOU.

Not ME.

How about explaining who should pay ? And why I should if I am not the baby daddy or the grandparent?



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 02:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
Talk YOU.
Not ME.


Meaningless word salad.


YOU get pregnant.
YOU want to slaughter the innocent baby.
Then YOU pay the executioner.
It's your responsibility.
It's your moral failure.
Don't be trying to get other people to pay for your mistakes.
Don't be trying to spread your moral failure on others.

Grow up ... YOU PAY.



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Abortions shouldnā€™t be used as a means of birth control, thatā€™s the biggest issue I have with abortions. Unfortunately, the majority of abortions are performed in that context. Donā€™t want a kid, keep your legs closed or use one of the many forms of birth control available. My tax dollars shouldnā€™t be used for your lack of responsibility and accountability. I have no problem funding birth control for those who canā€™t afford it but the amount of people usging abortion as a means of birth control is astronomical.

ā€¦and yes Iā€™m fully aware of the exceptions such as rape and major deformities, thatā€™s a different discussion.



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: KrustyKrab
a reply to: Annee

Abortions shouldnā€™t be used as a means of birth control, . . .


Why not?

If you're not ready to become a parent -- then don't become one.

And don't bring up all the silly arguments of abstinence, protection, blah blah -- nothing is full proof.

I SUPPORT LIVING CHILDREN.



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 05:23 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66


Procreation is a biological mechanism.

Any idiot can reproduce. And many do.

Some should never ever be a parent.

It's not special.

I SUPPORT LIVING CHILDREN



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

ONLY American Citizens are Legally Eligible to Vote in the United States Right , Annee ?





posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 07:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Has Anything Ever Changed for the Dems ? Hmm.............Seems Not...





posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 07:31 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
Procreation is a biological mechanism.


Sure. But I believe our ability to think about things on a deeper level gives us the opportunity to view things as more than mere mechanisms of the natural world.



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 08:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer

originally posted by: Annee
Procreation is a biological mechanism.


Sure. But I believe our ability to think about things on a deeper level gives us the opportunity to view things as more than mere mechanisms of the natural world.


I SUPPORT LIVING CHILDREN. ALL OF THEM.

When every child is cared for, fed, educated, sheltered - etc -- then talk to be about the unwanted before they are a child.

Who REALLY cares, loves the child?

And who is caught up in belief, concept, self-righteousness, etc.



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 08:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
And who is caught up in belief, concept, self-righteousness, etc.


That would be you. 100%

I don't say that as a bully.



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 08:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer

originally posted by: Annee
And who is caught up in belief, concept, self-righteousness, etc.


That would be you. 100%

I don't say that as a bully.


I don't agree.

"We" are conditioned to think a certain way.



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 08:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Just out of curiosity.

When do you consider a child, no longer a child?

Is it at a certain age? A certain maturity level?

What's the cut off for your caring?



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: Annee

Just out of curiosity.

When do you consider a child, no longer a child?

Is it at a certain age? A certain maturity level?

What's the cut off for your caring?


Just basing an opinion off of what sheā€™s posted about the subject, Iā€™d say the cut off is ā€œconvenienceā€.
Humans are similar to animals except we choose to procreate.



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 09:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Vermilion



Just basing an opinion off of what sheā€™s posted about the subject, Iā€™d say the cut off is ā€œconvenienceā€.


Is a pregnant 12-year-old a woman or a child?


Humans are similar to animals except we choose to procreate.


Since when have women had a choice whether or not to procreate?



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 10:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Vermilion

I would agree. Though my question is more general.

There is another subject, and on that one she doesn't care what the kids have to say after they're not kids anymore (regarding said subject).

So I was just wondering about the cut off of interest and support.

But I predict it's as you said, regarding any subject. Convenience.

edit on 7-9-2024 by WakeUpBeer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 10:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Since when have women had a choice whether or not to procreate?


Nuns make that decision all the time.



posted on Jul, 9 2024 @ 11:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Since when have women had a choice whether or not to procreate?


Nuns make that decision all the time.


Nuns are a very small section of humanity for one to claim that humans are different from animals because they can choose to procreate. However, rape supersedes a nun's pseudo choice not to conceive. In the USA it was legal to rape your wife until the 1990s. It's still legal in lots of countries around the world. Historically, women were bought and sold into marriage as property, and have had no choice in the matter. It wasn't until the 1970's that women were allowed to have a bank account without a responsible male's permission let alone obtain birth control.

Women weren't born with an on/off option on their ovaries. The only way for a woman to become pregnant is for a man to ejaculate. Only men can decide whether or not to ejaculate inside a woman. Once inside, it's outside the woman's control. Human women can't really "decide" not to procreate.

Can human men decide not to procreate? Only if they decide not to ejaculate inside a woman, but is that desire really something we humans can control? I don't believe so.



edit on 2220242024k18America/Chicago2024-07-09T23:18:22-05:0011pm2024-07-09T23:18:22-05:00 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
26
<< 21  22  23    25  26 >>

log in

join