a reply to:
777Vader
Steve Kirsh- about those clinical trials...
The tide is turning. They retracted his paper but now it is headed for publication and if it isn't we have the goods. Kind of a cool go around to get
the facts. There is a lot to parse through here but I'll try and pull out the critical factoids about the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials.
First problem was that only healthy clinical trial subjects aged 18- 55 years old were recruited. That leaves out children, pregnant women, elderly
and the immunocompromised. But...but they are safe and effective for everyone.
Something for us to consider since he is looking into the data- "Our World in Data across all reliably reporting entities seem to show the 'pandemic"
occured after, not before, the rollout of the injectables." That confirms what Dr. David Martin has said.
These PCR tests are problematic as we all now know, but that was used in the clinical trials to confirm whether a subject had contracted Covid, which
seems rather helpful to the cause, to distort the clinical trial results. False positives, false negatives- who cares.
There is so much here.
From the Cleveland Clinic Health System- "...the risk of breakthrough infection was significantly higher among those who received the earlier
injection, and a higher frequency of modmRNA innoculations resulted in a greater risk of Covid-19. Those who were not up to date had a 23% lower
incidence of Covid-19 than those up to date."
Imagine Pfizer's confidential report has 1.6 million adverse events- I suspect that is the tip of the iceberg.
"Pfizer's clinical trials exhibited a 36% increased risk of serious adverse events in the treated group vs the control group."
Pfizer engaged "in a consistent pattern of reporting delays of the date of death in case report forms across the entire trials. Of the 14 subjects
experiencing cardiac serious adverse events, 11 were individuals who received the BNT 162b2." Just push them out beyond the EUA investigation time
period.
As for the autopsy's- "74% of the autopsy findings death was the result of the Covid modmRNA product."
"The waning effect becomes more pronounced with successive boosters."
"Somewhat ironically, the power of the Covid-19 modmRNA to perpetuate the emergence of new variants tends to perpetuate the perception among the
general public that a new round of boosters is necessary. This sets up the endless vaccine- escape variant cycle and feedback loop."
He tackles the CDC lie that the jabs will prevent severe illness and death- "The probability of death and severe illness did not differentiate between
the treatment group and the control group."
Just to top this off- "The FDA only inspected 9 out of 153 study sites." That leads me to September and Phoebe Gates but I digress. Since 153-9=1
[44]- Obama.
Christine Grady has done a miserable job- where are the ethical concerns about retracting high quality, detailed papers.