Colorado Supreme Court Bans Trump from the 2024 Presidential Ballot.

originally posted by: GrandmaX
a reply to: matafuchs

Trump was impeached for incitement of insurrection, and it's still a ongoing investigation. Are you J6'er? You sure sound like one.

Trump made statements on J6 that falsely claimed widespread voter fraud and that he was seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. He repeatedly and baselessly asserted that he won the election, despite the certified results indicating otherwise.

When Trump made these false statements, it encouraged his brainwashed supporters to storm the Capitol in a violent and unlawful manner.

It's funny how facts completely wreck your fantasy -

Colorado Supreme Court is not serious? Crazy? What?

Re: theconservativetreehouse.com... -on-page-9/

Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme
Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s
deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is
sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the
stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include
President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt
of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.

""Wait, what?

Yes, that’s correct. As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely. The Colorado primary ballots printed, and the primary election will be over, before the Supreme Court puts this on their docket.""

-wmc

originally posted by: WeMustCare
As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely.

Because the Supreme Court will shoot them down and they will be embarrassed at their partisan nonsense being exposed. So they are avoiding having the Supreme Court rule. Betchya

ATS Thread - Tit for Tat - Republicans Now Call For Biden To Be Booted Off Ballots
Republicans cite 'insurrection' by Joe Biden ... letting in tens of millions of illegals means he isn't protecting the USA and the Constitution so it's insurrection and off the ballots for Biden. The republicans are just talking. I doubt anyone will actually do it. But it would be funny if they did.

originally posted by: WeMustCare
Colorado Supreme Court is not serious? Crazy? What?

Re: theconservativetreehouse.com... -on-page-9/

Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme
Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s
deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is
sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the
stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include
President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt
of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.

""Wait, what?

Yes, that’s correct. As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely. The Colorado primary ballots printed, and the primary election will be over, before the Supreme Court puts this on their docket.""

-wmc

It's all part of the scripted game. Trouble is, The Courts are using themselves as scapegoats (possibly illegally).

Democrats seem to be exploiting their own frivolity 😀

a reply to: underpass61

And they never even fired a shot from a registered or unregistered AR15 !! ✔️

a reply to: underpass61

Fantasy is great, but it's not a substitute for what actually happened.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

ATS Thread - Tit for Tat - Republicans Now Call For Biden To Be Booted Off Ballots
Republicans cite 'insurrection' by Joe Biden ... letting in tens of millions of illegals means he isn't protecting the USA and the Constitution so it's insurrection and off the ballots for Biden. The republicans are just talking. I doubt anyone will actually do it. But it would be funny if they did.

I knew it!!

I called it!!

ROFLULz 😀

a reply to: GrandmaX

Steroidal Frivolity 😀

originally posted by: GrandmaX
a reply to: underpass61

Fantasy is great, but it's not a substitute for what actually happened.

Hahaha wikipedia....


I thought you said you were a member...

a reply to: GrandmaX

That's wikipedia. You've gotta use a different source here.
Most at ATS do not accept Wikipedia much. It's unreliable.

a reply to: JinMI

Trump did that -

originally posted by: GrandmaX
a reply to: JinMI

Trump did that -

Looks like wikipedia is right.

a reply to: GrandmaX

If you're going to back up your BS with wikipedia then I won't waste any more time on you.

Derp

originally posted by: GrandmaX
Looks like wikipedia is right.

Um ... no. That's just a picture of a building and smoke.
It doesn't prove Trump engaged in insurrection.
And it doesn't prove Wikipedia right.

Seriously. You have to use a different source than Wikipedia.
Or at least other sources in addition to Wikipedia.
It isn't taken as reliable at ATS.

originally posted by: GrandmaX

originally posted by: GrandmaX
a reply to: JinMI

Trump did that -

Looks like wikipedia is right.

No, he didnt


Thanks for providing a valuable service however

originally posted by: GrandmaX
a reply to: underpass61

Fantasy is great, but it's not a substitute for what actually happened.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Now keep reading your own source(s), please.

A single article of impeachment charging Trump with "incitement of insurrection" against the U.S. government and "lawless action at the Capitol" was introduced to the House of Representatives on January 11, 2021.[6] .............At the trial, 57 senators voted "guilty", which was less than the two-thirds majority needed (67) to convict Trump, and 43 senators voted "not guilty", resulting in Trump being acquitted of the charges on February 13, 2021.[17]

An article of impeachment is not a criminal charge, those charges and the law pertaining appear to be under 18 U.S. Code § 2383.

Credit (or lack thereof) where credit is due, several protestors were charged for Seditious Conspiracy, which is contained within that code section, labelling a single portion of that tweet untrue...... So there's that.

originally posted by: GrandmaX
a reply to: underpass61

Fantasy is great, but it's not a substitute for what actually happened.

Facts don't matter when it comes to Trump.

As you will soon experience.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: GrandmaX
a reply to: underpass61

Fantasy is great, but it's not a substitute for what actually happened.

Facts don't matter when it comes to Trump.

As you will soon experience.

Where are the facts again Annee?

originally posted by: Annee
Facts don't matter when it comes to Trump.

Look, I'm not a Trump fan, but the FACTS are that he didn't have due process and that the left wing judges in Colorado screwed up. He has not been accused in a court of law. He has not been convicted. The judges were out of line to remove him from the ballot. It's clearly election interference.

If the dems do that to Trump, the republicans can make up something against Biden and take him off the ballot. If the dems don't need DUE PROCESS, then the republicans do not either.

Can you see how this can get really messy really fast?