Global Flood explains Oil Deposits and Geological layers

ATTENTION...please read before posting further....

BE AWARE THAT IF YOUR POST IS NOT ON TOPIC AND/OR IS ABOUT OTHER MEMBERS YOU MAY BE ABOUT TO HAVE POSTS REMOVED. OR YOU MAY BE TEMPORARILY POST BANNED!
AND, PLEASE REMEMBER THERE IS NO MORE MUD PIT....MUD NOT ALLOWED.

Everyone and I mean everyone is allowed to post here on topic and to do so without being called names or becoming the target of others' posts. Debate the topic and leave each other out of it. OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS are encouraged.
Those who refuse to get that concept may be POST BANNED!!!

These rules apply to all threads and if you want to engage in personal attacks there are other sites on the Internet where you can do that. Our goal is for ATS to be above that. For members here to post like mature adults.
YOU are responsible for your own posts

And, as always...
Do not reply to this post.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

That is pretty much Chan Thomas Adam and Eve theory.

The thing is the idea runs contrary to our understanding of plate tectonics.

And also is not consistent with current scientific understanding with the idea of massive tsunamis and winds resulting from a rapid pole flip being speculative and not supported by science.

The scientific consensus is that pole reversals, when they do occur, happen over long geological timescales taking thousands to millions of years to occur and not within a short period of time.

en.wikipedia.org...#:~:text=In%201963%2C%20he%20published%20the,cataclysmic%20events%20every%207%2C000%20years.
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk...

Maybe, just maybe, plate tectonics theories are just another lie peppered with a couple of truths to make it look legitimate? Maybe expanding earth theory is correct, you know, since everything fits together at around 6,000 miles in diameter.

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Subduction quakes are wicked.

Especially when there's a lot of slip. Large amounts of water can be displaced. Its a good thing for Japan, Sumatra, Chile, and Alaska these zones don't exist. They don't have to worry about massive earthquakes.

But I do have an alternate flood theory.

It wasn't really our Earth.

The Ark really WAS the Tardis!

Unbeknownst to Noah they went through a "connecting rift" that sent them to a different universe completely.

Noah's original planet was way smaller and had far less species of animals and no dinosaurs to worry about. Plus time/space are different on the inside of the boat, so that's why he could fit all those animals. And this first planet ACTUALLY did have enough water to cover the planet. Totally different Earth.

And it all makes total sense. They didn't realize that they went through a universal gateway, and came out in a universe where Earth is totally different.

And because they came out of the universe vortex on a mountain they didn't realize this planet had a large surviving population already. They didnt even know they transited universes. So that's why it doesn't matter there were only 8 people on their Tardis boat. The congenital defects from their epic inbreeding could not largely effect the future population.

But their story could still be told, and after 800 years, who's to know what really happened? Or which planet they were from with 2000 animals and 40 fold lifespans.

It's a good theory.

All you need is a Tardis Ark and connecting rift.

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Maybe, just maybe, plate tectonics theories are just another lie peppered with a couple of truths to make it look legitimate?

Maybe, but the theory of plate tectonics is widely accepted by our scientific communities.

And is supported by a substantial body of evidence from various fields of study, including geology, paleontology, and geophysics.

The evidence includes matching shapes of coastlines on different continents, the distribution of fossils and rock formations, earthquake patterns, and the magnetic striping of the ocean floor.

Maybe expanding earth theory is correct, you know, since everything fits together at around 6,000 miles in diameter.

Again, the above idea is not widely accepted within the scientific community because it contradicts the large body of evidence supporting plate tectonics.

Where is the evidence to support Chan Thomas's "Adam and Eve" theory?

education.nationalgeographic.org...

Plate Tectonics
In 1977, after decades of tediously collecting and mapping ocean sonar data, scientists began to see a fairly accurate picture of the seafloor emerge. The Tharp-Heezen map illustrated the geological features that characterize the seafloor and became a crucial factor in the acceptance of the theories of plate tectonics and continental drift. Today, these theories serve as the foundation upon which we understand the geologic processes that shape Earth.

There's lots of data out there to back up plate tectonics.

a reply to: Kurokage

Did you clock what happened in Japan?

A 7.6 magnitude earthquake with possible incoming 5m tsunami waves.



www.bbc.co.uk...

Edit: Japan have downgraded the major tsunami warning, so hopefully that's good news.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

What we need is a unified theory that combines both the principles of quantum mechanics and general relativity.

String theory is one of the theoretical frameworks that incorporates the idea of quantised spacetime yet still leaves a lot to be desired.

I don't know about the makings a new religion.

But we do require a new way of thinking outside the box that somehow manages to resolve both micro and macro conundrums aka quantum mechanics and general relativity.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

I'm sure there is an elephant joke in there somewhere but it doesn't change the fact that a unified theory that combines both principles of quantum mechanics and general relativity is exactly what's required.

New religions, or magic boats, not so much.

Happy New Year by the way.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

I'm sure there is an elephant joke in there somewhere but it doesn't change the fact that a unified theory that combines both principles of quantum mechanics and general relativity is exactly what's required.

New religions, or magic boats, not so much.

Happy New Year by the way.

Happy New Year to you as well, and all the other reTardists.
It has not escaped me this new religion began on January 1st, 2024.
The gematria for this date equates to 1.
I am getting chills

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

"Gematria" LoL

You do realise that "Gematria" is not considered a scientific or empirical practice.

Also by the looks of it using the horrible term that you appear to think so funny, disguised or otherwise, is going down like a lead balloon.

Anyhoo back on topic.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Lol... 'ReTardist'.

Naw, that was just a like for like absurd narrative counter.

But Happy New Year!

Of course, I'm obligated to point out the calender would make more sense if we reinserted Mercedonius (I suggest we call it Mercedes) between February and March, and reduced all months to 28 days, and keep the leap year somewhere every four years. New Years could be April 1st. And it would be so natural..


(Funny, but not accurate)

To bad our ancestors were triskaidekaphobic. Restore Ophiuchus too!

Don't let the babylonians dictate the use of 12 anymore because it fits their Weird Base 60 math. Because of them, hours have 60 minutes, circles have 360° and 12 months is the preference, Egypt even used a Base 12 system!

Boo preference for 12!

American History Fact: Until 1752 The Colonies used March 25th as the New Year. As England adopted that practice in 12th century, but switched when The Julian Calendar was abandoned.

It's all related, like a flood story, and 13 being reduced to 12, on a progression through Sumer -> Babylonia -> And all the subsequent cultures that took stories, numerical preference, and refined ideas from the previous.

The Flood is like having 12 months in a way, and a new year happening today.

originally posted by: Kurokage

Back on page 49 (half way down), when your where still trying to say water was under the mantle, when you've been shown many times it's not water.
I see you like to ignore any posts that show you're incorrect

I've shown you this multiple times. More recent research from 2023 has shown that there is in fact fluid water in these regions:



"Our research presents a method that more accurately determines the quantitative composition of ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) fluid high H2O (~40 wt.%) and solute (~60 wt.%) contents] "

link

You have to show why this study is wrong, because they implemented more accurate determinations of the composition of these various layers than prior studies. It was obvious that hydroxylated ringwoodite strongly insisted that there was actual fluid water down there, and they confirmed it to be about 40% of the weight of these layers.

a reply to: cooperton
Honestly who gives AF if this study is right or wrong, it doesn't prove or disprove the noah flood story.

It just seems like the last straw you can cling to.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: cooperton
Honestly who gives AF if this study is right or wrong, it doesn't prove or disprove the noah flood story.

It just seems like the last straw you can cling to.

it's the geological source I use to show there is water beneath the earth's crust when someone asks where the water came from. Oceans upon oceans of water beneath earth's crust, confirmed in 2023, predicted in the Bible.