If you support the call for Israel to offer ceasefire, then you support Hamas.

a reply to: BiothermalReactor

Even if it was only 24 hours, that would have been plenty of time to get out of the bombing zone, even with Hama's interference should they have wished to.

How stupid must they have been to stay?

Any intelligent adult knew full well the capabilities of Israel, so must have known what was coming.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: SomeStupidName


53% in polling show support for Hamas, mostly in Gaza.

coopwb.in...

A more local accurate statistical analysis shows 44% over all support Hamas in both Gaza and the West Bank.

www.pcpsr.org...

At the end of the day there is a huge support among the Palestinian population, and course neighboring nations for Hamas.

Level every last square inch and tarmac over it then.

You must be ignoring the 49% of Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, otherwise you would surely not be suggesting Israel to commit War Crimes and make no distinction between innocent Palestinian civilians and HAMAS militants?

Do the 49% of Palestinians who do not want HAMAS, not deserve to be given a chance of survival?

Now, I'm still following your own logic here, quite faithfully, when I ask this:

Are you willing to admit that the Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, and who would obviously have supported a ceasefire, are supporting HAMAS if they call for a ceasefire?

Yep , totally ignoring the 49%.

There is no such thing as a 'ceasefire' with regards to this war, 'deferring' would be more apt.
Innocent Palestinian civilians ? Have the 49% taken to task the terrorist that acted in their name?

This situation will be a never ending cycle if a ceasefire is agreed.
Many 10's of thousands more, those that are children today, the real innocent will die in the future for the actions/inactions of their fathers today.

I stand by my 'Level every last square inch and tarmac over it' statement, as it seems a whole lot more humane than dragging it out across generations.

The other 51% of Gaza civilians are also NON-COMBATANTS NONMILITANTS.

Only if they take up arms with HAMAS do they become militants.

I think we played into a fallacy that I just now recognized, that non-combatant civilian HAMAS supporters in poll results deserve to die along with HAMAS.

It's not about deserving anything. It's about the cost of doing nothing. Those are the two answers, fight back or don't. Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing that millions will thrive thanks to their sacrifice instead of dying in vain knowing thousands and perhaps millions more are doomed to the same fate.

It's about the narrow perception and logical fallacy that the only way to fight terrorism is with indiscriminate destruction, regardless of civilian presence.

Can you give me thought on this line of Disinformation?

You mean the thoughts I literally just typed a few minutes ago and you brushed off without pause or regard?

Thoughts like these?

"Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing"

This is not correct.

Many thousands LESS would have died without the indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week.

a reply to: BiothermalReactor

"Many thousands LESS would have died without the indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week."

Blimey.

Was it indiscriminate or precision guided?

originally posted by: Tagz
a reply to: BiothermalReactor

Even if it was only 24 hours, that would have been plenty of time to get out of the bombing zone, even with Hama's interference should they have wished to.

How stupid must they have been to stay?

Even with HAMAS interference they had plenty of time?

There's no way this can be correct.

If HAMAS was keeping people in the city, then those people COULD NOT LEAVE.



Come on, people.
This is page 25 and we are still stuck on fallacious disinformation that only serves to absolve Israel of the atrocities they perpetrate on innocent civilians, by which such atrocities are similar to those by HAMA,(as the required disclaimer goes).

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: BiothermalReactor

"Many thousands LESS would have died without the indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week."

Blimey.

Was it indiscriminate or precision guided?

Please allow me to clarify for you what I mean by "indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week.

By indiscriminate, I mean the TARGET ZONES OF intentional BOMBARDMENT did not distinguish between terrorist targets and civilian targets.

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz
a reply to: BiothermalReactor

Even if it was only 24 hours, that would have been plenty of time to get out of the bombing zone, even with Hama's interference should they have wished to.

How stupid must they have been to stay?

If HAMAS was keeping people in the city, then those people COULD NOT LEAVE.

Tens of thousands verse how many Hamas?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Was it indiscriminate or precision guided?

The former, Blimey.

"This is not about surgical strikes and military infrastructure anymore," an IDF officer said about the war in Gaza. "This means we will obliterate civilian infrastructure as well. Apartment buildings will be toppled. Hezbollah feeds off our apprehension to land a decisive strike, which means we will exhibit the exact opposite to avoid opening a northern front."

No time to waste: Hamas must feel Israeli wrath immediately

a reply to: BiothermalReactor

Is it true radar data shows that Hamas turned residential areas that you showed into rocket bases to store and launch rockets?

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: SomeStupidName


53% in polling show support for Hamas, mostly in Gaza.

coopwb.in...

A more local accurate statistical analysis shows 44% over all support Hamas in both Gaza and the West Bank.

www.pcpsr.org...

At the end of the day there is a huge support among the Palestinian population, and course neighboring nations for Hamas.

Level every last square inch and tarmac over it then.

You must be ignoring the 49% of Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, otherwise you would surely not be suggesting Israel to commit War Crimes and make no distinction between innocent Palestinian civilians and HAMAS militants?

Do the 49% of Palestinians who do not want HAMAS, not deserve to be given a chance of survival?

Now, I'm still following your own logic here, quite faithfully, when I ask this:

Are you willing to admit that the Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, and who would obviously have supported a ceasefire, are supporting HAMAS if they call for a ceasefire?

Yep , totally ignoring the 49%.

There is no such thing as a 'ceasefire' with regards to this war, 'deferring' would be more apt.
Innocent Palestinian civilians ? Have the 49% taken to task the terrorist that acted in their name?

This situation will be a never ending cycle if a ceasefire is agreed.
Many 10's of thousands more, those that are children today, the real innocent will die in the future for the actions/inactions of their fathers today.

I stand by my 'Level every last square inch and tarmac over it' statement, as it seems a whole lot more humane than dragging it out across generations.

The other 51% of Gaza civilians are also NON-COMBATANTS NONMILITANTS.

Only if they take up arms with HAMAS do they become militants.

I think we played into a fallacy that I just now recognized, that non-combatant civilian HAMAS supporters in poll results deserve to die along with HAMAS.

It's not about deserving anything. It's about the cost of doing nothing. Those are the two answers, fight back or don't. Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing that millions will thrive thanks to their sacrifice instead of dying in vain knowing thousands and perhaps millions more are doomed to the same fate.

It's about the narrow perception and logical fallacy that the only way to fight terrorism is with indiscriminate destruction, regardless of civilian presence.

Can you give me thought on this line of Disinformation?

You mean the thoughts I literally just typed a few minutes ago and you brushed off without pause or regard?

Thoughts like these?

"Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing"

This is not correct.

Many thousands LESS would have died without the indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week.

Hmm. It's interesting because you claimed you are not a counter terrorism expert, yet you are expert enough to decide HAMAS should be protected at all costs if it means one less civilian casualty. That's what you're telling me. And I don't buy it.

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: BiothermalReactor

Is it true radar data shows that Hamas turned residential areas that you showed into rocket bases to store and launch rockets?

Is it true HAMAS turned all residential areas that you showed into rocket bases to store and launch rockets?

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: SomeStupidName


53% in polling show support for Hamas, mostly in Gaza.

coopwb.in...

A more local accurate statistical analysis shows 44% over all support Hamas in both Gaza and the West Bank.

www.pcpsr.org...

At the end of the day there is a huge support among the Palestinian population, and course neighboring nations for Hamas.

Level every last square inch and tarmac over it then.

You must be ignoring the 49% of Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, otherwise you would surely not be suggesting Israel to commit War Crimes and make no distinction between innocent Palestinian civilians and HAMAS militants?

Do the 49% of Palestinians who do not want HAMAS, not deserve to be given a chance of survival?

Now, I'm still following your own logic here, quite faithfully, when I ask this:

Are you willing to admit that the Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, and who would obviously have supported a ceasefire, are supporting HAMAS if they call for a ceasefire?

Yep , totally ignoring the 49%.

There is no such thing as a 'ceasefire' with regards to this war, 'deferring' would be more apt.
Innocent Palestinian civilians ? Have the 49% taken to task the terrorist that acted in their name?

This situation will be a never ending cycle if a ceasefire is agreed.
Many 10's of thousands more, those that are children today, the real innocent will die in the future for the actions/inactions of their fathers today.

I stand by my 'Level every last square inch and tarmac over it' statement, as it seems a whole lot more humane than dragging it out across generations.

The other 51% of Gaza civilians are also NON-COMBATANTS NONMILITANTS.

Only if they take up arms with HAMAS do they become militants.

I think we played into a fallacy that I just now recognized, that non-combatant civilian HAMAS supporters in poll results deserve to die along with HAMAS.

It's not about deserving anything. It's about the cost of doing nothing. Those are the two answers, fight back or don't. Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing that millions will thrive thanks to their sacrifice instead of dying in vain knowing thousands and perhaps millions more are doomed to the same fate.

It's about the narrow perception and logical fallacy that the only way to fight terrorism is with indiscriminate destruction, regardless of civilian presence.

Can you give me thought on this line of Disinformation?

You mean the thoughts I literally just typed a few minutes ago and you brushed off without pause or regard?

Thoughts like these?

"Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing"

This is not correct.

Many thousands LESS would have died without the indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week.

you are expert enough to decide HAMAS should be protected

No one in this thread has, even remotely, made this suggestion.

You are 100% correct not to buy it.

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: SomeStupidName


53% in polling show support for Hamas, mostly in Gaza.

coopwb.in...

A more local accurate statistical analysis shows 44% over all support Hamas in both Gaza and the West Bank.

www.pcpsr.org...

At the end of the day there is a huge support among the Palestinian population, and course neighboring nations for Hamas.

Level every last square inch and tarmac over it then.

You must be ignoring the 49% of Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, otherwise you would surely not be suggesting Israel to commit War Crimes and make no distinction between innocent Palestinian civilians and HAMAS militants?

Do the 49% of Palestinians who do not want HAMAS, not deserve to be given a chance of survival?

Now, I'm still following your own logic here, quite faithfully, when I ask this:

Are you willing to admit that the Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, and who would obviously have supported a ceasefire, are supporting HAMAS if they call for a ceasefire?

Yep , totally ignoring the 49%.

There is no such thing as a 'ceasefire' with regards to this war, 'deferring' would be more apt.
Innocent Palestinian civilians ? Have the 49% taken to task the terrorist that acted in their name?

This situation will be a never ending cycle if a ceasefire is agreed.
Many 10's of thousands more, those that are children today, the real innocent will die in the future for the actions/inactions of their fathers today.

I stand by my 'Level every last square inch and tarmac over it' statement, as it seems a whole lot more humane than dragging it out across generations.

The other 51% of Gaza civilians are also NON-COMBATANTS NONMILITANTS.

Only if they take up arms with HAMAS do they become militants.

I think we played into a fallacy that I just now recognized, that non-combatant civilian HAMAS supporters in poll results deserve to die along with HAMAS.

It's not about deserving anything. It's about the cost of doing nothing. Those are the two answers, fight back or don't. Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing that millions will thrive thanks to their sacrifice instead of dying in vain knowing thousands and perhaps millions more are doomed to the same fate.

It's about the narrow perception and logical fallacy that the only way to fight terrorism is with indiscriminate destruction, regardless of civilian presence.

Can you give me thought on this line of Disinformation?

You mean the thoughts I literally just typed a few minutes ago and you brushed off without pause or regard?

Thoughts like these?

"Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing"

This is not correct.

Many thousands LESS would have died without the indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week.

you are expert enough to decide HAMAS should be protected

No one in this thread has, even remotely, made this suggestion.

You are 100% correct not to buy it.

Then ignore the civilian population and level the place. Problem solved.

If it makes you feel better about casualty numbers, erect a monument in honor of the innocent who perished so that millions can persevere.

Either way, HAMAS gotta go and fast. FAFO

originally posted by: Insurrectile
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Was it indiscriminate or precision guided?

The former, Blimey.

"This is not about surgical strikes and military infrastructure anymore," an IDF officer said about the war in Gaza. "This means we will obliterate civilian infrastructure as well. Apartment buildings will be toppled. Hezbollah feeds off our apprehension to land a decisive strike, which means we will exhibit the exact opposite to avoid opening a northern front."

No time to waste: Hamas must feel Israeli wrath immediately

But HAMAS wears civilian uniforms!

How are precision-guided bombs supposed to distinguish between civilians and terrorists?

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: SomeStupidName


53% in polling show support for Hamas, mostly in Gaza.

coopwb.in...

A more local accurate statistical analysis shows 44% over all support Hamas in both Gaza and the West Bank.

www.pcpsr.org...

At the end of the day there is a huge support among the Palestinian population, and course neighboring nations for Hamas.

Level every last square inch and tarmac over it then.

You must be ignoring the 49% of Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, otherwise you would surely not be suggesting Israel to commit War Crimes and make no distinction between innocent Palestinian civilians and HAMAS militants?

Do the 49% of Palestinians who do not want HAMAS, not deserve to be given a chance of survival?

Now, I'm still following your own logic here, quite faithfully, when I ask this:

Are you willing to admit that the Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, and who would obviously have supported a ceasefire, are supporting HAMAS if they call for a ceasefire?

Yep , totally ignoring the 49%.

There is no such thing as a 'ceasefire' with regards to this war, 'deferring' would be more apt.
Innocent Palestinian civilians ? Have the 49% taken to task the terrorist that acted in their name?

This situation will be a never ending cycle if a ceasefire is agreed.
Many 10's of thousands more, those that are children today, the real innocent will die in the future for the actions/inactions of their fathers today.

I stand by my 'Level every last square inch and tarmac over it' statement, as it seems a whole lot more humane than dragging it out across generations.

The other 51% of Gaza civilians are also NON-COMBATANTS NONMILITANTS.

Only if they take up arms with HAMAS do they become militants.

I think we played into a fallacy that I just now recognized, that non-combatant civilian HAMAS supporters in poll results deserve to die along with HAMAS.

It's not about deserving anything. It's about the cost of doing nothing. Those are the two answers, fight back or don't. Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing that millions will thrive thanks to their sacrifice instead of dying in vain knowing thousands and perhaps millions more are doomed to the same fate.

It's about the narrow perception and logical fallacy that the only way to fight terrorism is with indiscriminate destruction, regardless of civilian presence.

Can you give me thought on this line of Disinformation?

You mean the thoughts I literally just typed a few minutes ago and you brushed off without pause or regard?

Thoughts like these?

"Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing"

This is not correct.

Many thousands LESS would have died without the indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week.

you are expert enough to decide HAMAS should be protected

No one in this thread has, even remotely, made this suggestion.

You are 100% correct not to buy it.

Then ignore the civilian population and level the place. Problem solved.

Okay, enjoy your enraged terrorist factions, in all the surrounding lands, gaining new recruits.


Edit2Add:™

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: SomeStupidName


53% in polling show support for Hamas, mostly in Gaza.

coopwb.in...

A more local accurate statistical analysis shows 44% over all support Hamas in both Gaza and the West Bank.

www.pcpsr.org...

At the end of the day there is a huge support among the Palestinian population, and course neighboring nations for Hamas.

Level every last square inch and tarmac over it then.

You must be ignoring the 49% of Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, otherwise you would surely not be suggesting Israel to commit War Crimes and make no distinction between innocent Palestinian civilians and HAMAS militants?

Do the 49% of Palestinians who do not want HAMAS, not deserve to be given a chance of survival?

Now, I'm still following your own logic here, quite faithfully, when I ask this:

Are you willing to admit that the Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, and who would obviously have supported a ceasefire, are supporting HAMAS if they call for a ceasefire?

Yep , totally ignoring the 49%.

There is no such thing as a 'ceasefire' with regards to this war, 'deferring' would be more apt.
Innocent Palestinian civilians ? Have the 49% taken to task the terrorist that acted in their name?

This situation will be a never ending cycle if a ceasefire is agreed.
Many 10's of thousands more, those that are children today, the real innocent will die in the future for the actions/inactions of their fathers today.

I stand by my 'Level every last square inch and tarmac over it' statement, as it seems a whole lot more humane than dragging it out across generations.

The other 51% of Gaza civilians are also NON-COMBATANTS NONMILITANTS.

Only if they take up arms with HAMAS do they become militants.

I think we played into a fallacy that I just now recognized, that non-combatant civilian HAMAS supporters in poll results deserve to die along with HAMAS.

It's not about deserving anything. It's about the cost of doing nothing. Those are the two answers, fight back or don't. Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing that millions will thrive thanks to their sacrifice instead of dying in vain knowing thousands and perhaps millions more are doomed to the same fate.

It's about the narrow perception and logical fallacy that the only way to fight terrorism is with indiscriminate destruction, regardless of civilian presence.

Can you give me thought on this line of Disinformation?

You mean the thoughts I literally just typed a few minutes ago and you brushed off without pause or regard?

Thoughts like these?

"Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing"

This is not correct.

Many thousands LESS would have died without the indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week.

you are expert enough to decide HAMAS should be protected

No one in this thread has, even remotely, made this suggestion.

You are 100% correct not to buy it.

Then ignore the civilian population and level the place. Problem solved.

Okay, enjoy your enraged terrorist factions, in all the surrounding lands, gaining new recruits.

After enough recruits are buried or cremated, the new ones will stop answering the phone. That's generally how the war on terror is supposed to end.

Let's show some backbone and pave over the bastards along with their hostages. If the hostages could speak from the grave, they would say thank you.

I know I would.

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: BiothermalReactor

Is it true radar data shows that Hamas turned residential areas that you showed into rocket bases to store and launch rockets?

Is it true HAMAS turned all residential areas that you showed into rocket bases to store and launch rockets?

Look at that. You have to play word games and ignore the truth.

Let’s try this again. Is it true that radar data shows the areas struck by Israel where residential areas used as rocket storage and rocket bases.

If Hamas cared about civilians and wasn’t out to use them as human shields, then they wouldn’t turn neighborhoods into rocket bases.

Pretty simple.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Tagz

originally posted by: SomeStupidName


53% in polling show support for Hamas, mostly in Gaza.

coopwb.in...

A more local accurate statistical analysis shows 44% over all support Hamas in both Gaza and the West Bank.

www.pcpsr.org...

At the end of the day there is a huge support among the Palestinian population, and course neighboring nations for Hamas.

Level every last square inch and tarmac over it then.

You must be ignoring the 49% of Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, otherwise you would surely not be suggesting Israel to commit War Crimes and make no distinction between innocent Palestinian civilians and HAMAS militants?

Do the 49% of Palestinians who do not want HAMAS, not deserve to be given a chance of survival?

Now, I'm still following your own logic here, quite faithfully, when I ask this:

Are you willing to admit that the Palestinians who do not support HAMAS, and who would obviously have supported a ceasefire, are supporting HAMAS if they call for a ceasefire?

Yep , totally ignoring the 49%.

There is no such thing as a 'ceasefire' with regards to this war, 'deferring' would be more apt.
Innocent Palestinian civilians ? Have the 49% taken to task the terrorist that acted in their name?

This situation will be a never ending cycle if a ceasefire is agreed.
Many 10's of thousands more, those that are children today, the real innocent will die in the future for the actions/inactions of their fathers today.

I stand by my 'Level every last square inch and tarmac over it' statement, as it seems a whole lot more humane than dragging it out across generations.

The other 51% of Gaza civilians are also NON-COMBATANTS NONMILITANTS.

Only if they take up arms with HAMAS do they become militants.

I think we played into a fallacy that I just now recognized, that non-combatant civilian HAMAS supporters in poll results deserve to die along with HAMAS.

It's not about deserving anything. It's about the cost of doing nothing. Those are the two answers, fight back or don't. Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing that millions will thrive thanks to their sacrifice instead of dying in vain knowing thousands and perhaps millions more are doomed to the same fate.

It's about the narrow perception and logical fallacy that the only way to fight terrorism is with indiscriminate destruction, regardless of civilian presence.

Can you give me thought on this line of Disinformation?

You mean the thoughts I literally just typed a few minutes ago and you brushed off without pause or regard?

Thoughts like these?

"Those non combatants are going to die either way. This way, the hundreds die knowing"

This is not correct.

Many thousands LESS would have died without the indiscriminate precision-guided bombardment lasting week after week.

you are expert enough to decide HAMAS should be protected

No one in this thread has, even remotely, made this suggestion.

You are 100% correct not to buy it.

Then ignore the civilian population and level the place. Problem solved.

Okay, enjoy your enraged terrorist factions, in all the surrounding lands, gaining new recruits.

After enough recruits are buried or cremated, the new ones will stop answering the phone. That's generally how the war on terror is supposed to end.

Let's show some backbone and pave over the bastards along with their hostages. If the hostages could speak from the grave, they would say thank you.

I know I would.

That's how the war on terror is supposed to end??lol

The so called War on Terror will never end and that fault lies with not just the terrorists.

a reply to: BiothermalReactor

Rocket & Mortar Attacks Against Israel by Date

2023

October 7-November 14

9,500+

In the early days of the war in Gaza started by the Hamas infiltration and attack on Israeli civilians, more than 6,000 rockets were fired from Gaza. The bombardment has continued.


May 10-13

1,469 Rockets

RocketsThe IDF reported that 1,468 rockets were launched into Israel during Operation Shield and Arrow; 291 fell in Gaza; and 437 were intercepted by Iron Dome. Two rockets aimed at Tel Aviv were shot down by David’s Sling, and most of the rest landed in open areas without causing damage. One Israeli was killed when a rocket hit an apartment in Rehovot. A Palestinian laborer from Gaza working in Israel also died in a rocket strike.

2021

May 10-20

4,369 Rockets

More than 4,369 rockets were launched toward Sderot, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Jerusalem and neighboring communities. Ten Israelis were killed. More than 90 percent of projectiles heading toward populated areas were intercepted by Iron Dome. Roughly a third of the rockets landed inside the Gaza Strip. Most of the others landed in open fields.

How about Hamas just not launch rockets from residential neighborhoods in the first place….

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: BiothermalReactor

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: BiothermalReactor

Is it true radar data shows that Hamas turned residential areas that you showed into rocket bases to store and launch rockets?

Is it true HAMAS turned all residential areas that you showed into rocket bases to store and launch rockets?

If Hamas cared about civilians and wasn’t out to use them as human shields, then they wouldn’t turn neighborhoods into rocket bases.

Pretty simple.

Did they turn the entire northern half of the city into rocket bases?

Where are these satellite photographs?

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: BiothermalReactor

Rocket & Mortar Attacks Against Israel by Date

2023

October 7-November 14

9,500+

In the early days of the war in Gaza started by the Hamas infiltration and attack on Israeli civilians, more than 6,000 rockets were fired from Gaza. The bombardment has continued.


May 10-13

1,469 Rockets

RocketsThe IDF reported that 1,468 rockets were launched into Israel during Operation Shield and Arrow; 291 fell in Gaza; and 437 were intercepted by Iron Dome. Two rockets aimed at Tel Aviv were shot down by David’s Sling, and most of the rest landed in open areas without causing damage. One Israeli was killed when a rocket hit an apartment in Rehovot. A Palestinian laborer from Gaza working in Israel also died in a rocket strike.

2021

May 10-20

4,369 Rockets

More than 4,369 rockets were launched toward Sderot, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Jerusalem and neighboring communities. Ten Israelis were killed. More than 90 percent of projectiles heading toward populated areas were intercepted by Iron Dome. Roughly a third of the rockets landed inside the Gaza Strip. Most of the others landed in open fields.

How about Hamas just not launch rockets from residential neighborhoods in the first place….

Oh no!

According to the pro-hamas gang, the rockets are just palestinians free speech.

*eye roll*