It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SourGrapes
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: Jhayesdvm
a reply to: BiothermalReactor
I'd ask you what specifically makes you support a ceasefire and what you think that will accomplish. If you cite some made-up numbers that Hamas fed you, and don't believe that Hamas will kill more Israeli children next time they have the opportunity, then I'd call you an idiot.
Everyone who supports a ceasefires believe it will accomplish two things:
1: combat stops
2: leaders talk
There was a ceasefire, and dirty Arabs started decapitation babies out of nowhere. If you'd like to go over there and tell them they shouldn't do that, I'll buy your ticket.
Arab is a very general term and your comment sounds racist because it sounds like being an Arab means being predisposed to the thing you describe during a ceasefire.
What leaders talk? Which ones? Are you talking about Hamas leaders in Qatar? Do you think the billionaire Hamas leaders in Qatar gaf about "peace talks"? Seriously?
like wise
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: FaeDedAgain
as do I but I am not a zionist...neither are you.
you should accept that.
a reply to: DBCowboy
You do you, boo
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: BiothermalReactor
I don't care what you do.
I'm just pointing out BS from pseudo-intellectuals who think they're smarter than everyone.
Why don't you attack the argument instead of slandering me without proof?
The topic is the logical fallacy of arguing supporting a ceasefire is supporting terrorists.
*sigh*
I have pointed out that you can't destroy hamas while calling for a cease-fire that will not destroy hamas.
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: BiothermalReactor
I don't care what you do.
I'm just pointing out BS from pseudo-intellectuals who think they're smarter than everyone.
Why don't you attack the argument instead of slandering me without proof?
The topic is the logical fallacy of arguing supporting a ceasefire is supporting terrorists.
*sigh*
I have pointed out that you can't destroy hamas while calling for a cease-fire that will not destroy hamas.
I agree with your statement 100%.
You also can't kill more innocent civilians with hundreds of [guided] [precision] bombs.
You also can't eliminate HAMAS without a ceasefire without completely and utterly razing the entire city and collapsing every tunnel, and I'm pretty sure that will not keep Israel safe, nor will Israel have the same level of support from the western world as before.
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: BiothermalReactor
I don't care what you do.
I'm just pointing out BS from pseudo-intellectuals who think they're smarter than everyone.
Why don't you attack the argument instead of slandering me without proof?
The topic is the logical fallacy of arguing supporting a ceasefire is supporting terrorists.
*sigh*
I have pointed out that you can't destroy hamas while calling for a cease-fire that will not destroy hamas.
I agree with your statement 100%.
You also can't kill more innocent civilians with hundreds of [guided] [precision] bombs.
You also can't eliminate HAMAS without a ceasefire without completely and utterly razing the entire city and collapsing every tunnel, and I'm pretty sure that will not keep Israel safe, nor will Israel have the same level of support from the western world as before.
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
You also can't eliminate HAMAS without a ceasefire without completely and utterly razing the entire city and collapsing every tunnel, and I'm pretty sure that will not keep Israel safe, nor will Israel have the same level of support from the western world as before.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: BiothermalReactor
I don't care what you do.
I'm just pointing out BS from pseudo-intellectuals who think they're smarter than everyone.
Why don't you attack the argument instead of slandering me without proof?
The topic is the logical fallacy of arguing supporting a ceasefire is supporting terrorists.
*sigh*
I have pointed out that you can't destroy hamas while calling for a cease-fire that will not destroy hamas.
I agree with your statement 100%.
You also can't kill more innocent civilians with hundreds of [guided] [precision] bombs.
You also can't eliminate HAMAS without a ceasefire without completely and utterly razing the entire city and collapsing every tunnel, and I'm pretty sure that will not keep Israel safe, nor will Israel have the same level of support from the western world as before.
and so it's time for the Palestinian people to turn on Hamas .
If they don't want their city reduced to rubble it's time to kill the cancer .
originally posted by: Daughter2v2
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
You also can't eliminate HAMAS without a ceasefire without completely and utterly razing the entire city and collapsing every tunnel, and I'm pretty sure that will not keep Israel safe, nor will Israel have the same level of support from the western world as before.
That wouldn't even work. The Hamas leaders are probably far away and very protected.
And if Israel kills everyone in Palestine, it's just going to create hatred in other countries. As Elon Musk said for every Hamas member killed there are three more created.
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: BiothermalReactor
I don't care what you do.
I'm just pointing out BS from pseudo-intellectuals who think they're smarter than everyone.
Why don't you attack the argument instead of slandering me without proof?
The topic is the logical fallacy of arguing supporting a ceasefire is supporting terrorists.
*sigh*
I have pointed out that you can't destroy hamas while calling for a cease-fire that will not destroy hamas.
I agree with your statement 100%.
You also can't kill more innocent civilians with hundreds of [guided] [precision] bombs.
You also can't eliminate HAMAS without a ceasefire without completely and utterly razing the entire city and collapsing every tunnel, and I'm pretty sure that will not keep Israel safe, nor will Israel have the same level of support from the western world as before.
and so it's time for the Palestinian people to turn on Hamas .
If they don't want their city reduced to rubble it's time to kill the cancer .
They won't get that chance or any other if too many people believe a ceasefire means supporting terrorists.
originally posted by: Daughter2v2
a reply to: DBCowboy
The same way we keep white supremist from killing minorities.
The same way we kept Muslim children safe after that nut case stabbed that little boy to death over 20 times.
And I don't believe that if everyone had equal rights, there would be mass killings.
There's plenty of videos on both sides calling for death to the other side...
But as long as there aren't leaders stirring up hatred, people will naturally just want to live in peace and take care of their families.
It's easy to hate someone if they live behind a wall. If people lived together, shared roads, schools ect. it would be hard to stir up that hatred.
originally posted by: TheValeyard
a reply to: DBCowboy
Well when someone's actively swinging at you you tend to swing back,
unless you're the Quaker Oats guy.
originally posted by: Daughter2v2
originally posted by: BiothermalReactor
You also can't eliminate HAMAS without a ceasefire without completely and utterly razing the entire city and collapsing every tunnel, and I'm pretty sure that will not keep Israel safe, nor will Israel have the same level of support from the western world as before.
That wouldn't even work. The Hamas leaders are probably far away and very protected.
And if Israel kills everyone in Palestine, it's just going to create hatred in other countries. As Elon Musk said for every Hamas member killed there are three more created.