Noahs Ark and the Biblical World Wide Flood Never Happened

This thread has well and truly jumped the shark!

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

An interesting thing about soil.

You must be the life and soul at parties.

Flooding can indeed have severe consequences for crops, not really any two ways about it.

It might depend on factors like crop type, growth stage, and/or environmental conditions.

But unless you are trying to grow rice or some other semi-aquatic crop, or possibly be managing the land, its generally not a desirable thing to happen i should imagine for most farmers.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

The idea that everything in the universe is composed of light, frequency, and vibration is a concept that aligns with certain philosophical and metaphysical perspectives, but it is not a widely accepted scientific explanation.

Care to elaborate on your vast oversimplification and metaphysical observation?

It explains completely why the seed is the important element in regreening infertile soil.
Though organic matter and urea is necessary, it is only essential for complexity.
This happens naturally in old growth forests where animals make their homes and poop and pee.
But not needed for grasses.
The sun is the energy.
The soil is the womb.
The seed is the source for dna that becomes activated by the sun's light waves and its varying frequencies.
The dna from the seed vibrates into its pre-designed form.
I heard a billionaire talking about the sun and soil.
His name is Dan Pena.
He claimed that the soil and the plants traps 80,000 times the energy from the sun.

That thought fascinates me.

a reply to: andy06shake

I'll have a word with a real farmer round the corner who's fields are flooded.

I won't mention quantum messaging tho.

He'd think I was some sort of loon.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Thats not science FarmerSimulation or any sort of tangible coherent explanation as to the claim you made that everything in the universe is composed of light, frequency, and vibration

As to Dan Pena is this the fellow?

Is the man not a business coach and proven fraud

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

"He claimed that the soil and the plants traps 80,000 times the energy from the sun."

Yep. Shark, jumped.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

An interesting thing about soil.

You must be the life and soul at parties.

Flooding can indeed have severe consequences for crops, not really any two ways about it.

It might depend on factors like crop type, growth stage, and/or environmental conditions.

But unless you are trying to grow rice or some other semi-aquatic crop, or possibly be managing the land, its generally not a desirable thing to happen i should imagine for most farmers.

In Egypt they had a system that required replanting every year after the Nile Flooding where they grew using the silt left from floods.
Certainly it limited what they could grow as crops.
But they sectioned off parcels for multiple farmers to utilize every year

Yeah, I watched that video.
So the fact he uses his castle for tours makes him fake?

But dang dude.
He owns a Scottish castle.
I wanna be fake like that too.
Did I get that right or do I have to watch it again.
I really like listening to that hardass calling his students pussies and c unts for being meely ass crying wimps and simps.
So do me a favor and don't beat him up too much.
I like him fake or not

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

"He claimed that the soil and the plants traps 80,000 times the energy from the sun."

Yep. Shark, jumped.

Dude.
That's settled science

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Thats not science FarmerSimulation or any sort of tangible coherent explanation as to the claim you made that everything in the universe is composed of light, frequency, and vibration

As to Dan Pena is this the fellow?

Is the man not a business coach and proven fraud

a reply to: FarmerSimulation



Sorry Andy is having his dinner and cant come out to play right now.

Side note outskirts of Gloucester, England, not Egypt, so there is that.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Silt from rivers, yes. Torrential rain, not so much.

Is your "farm" real, or simulated?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

"He claimed that the soil and the plants traps 80,000 times the energy from the sun."

Yep. Shark, jumped.

Let me challenge you.
There is no darkness.
Dark is an absence of light.
There is no cold.
Cold is a descriptor for an absence of heat.
Light is measured in lumens.
Heat is measured in BTU or joule.
There is no measurement for dark or cold.
The light from the sun is the source for all energy in the earth.
We use things that trap that energy for heat and light.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Silt from rivers, yes. Torrential rain, not so much.

Is your "farm" real, or simulated?

I am a simulation.
I am a carpenter by trade

Show him the difference no till makes in before and after photos.
Gee, how did I know he tills the ground?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: andy06shake

I'll have a word with a real farmer round the corner who's fields are flooded.

I won't mention quantum messaging tho.

He'd think I was some sort of loon.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

He's been farming this land for the best part of 50 years.

Probably doesn't need advice from a random "carpenter" on a conspiracy website, but I'll ask him.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Well, yes. So what?

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Talk about teaching your grandmother how to suck eggs?!!!!!

His farm seems to do OK without your sage advice.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
This thread has well and truly jumped the shark!

It's abject stupidity.

ALL the plants would have died.
Two miles of ice cold water over them for a whole year.
No sunlight. Totally waterlogged. Dead everything.
And the soil ruined by the salt in the water.
And the oceans would have died.
The change in salinity, temperature, fresh/salt mix .... Dead algae = dead oceans.
The planet would have been dead.

pseudoscientists and mental gymnastics.

a reply to: FlyersFan

Yeah, but,....quantum messaging, lasers turning frogs into salamanders, and, and, all stuff like that?

Reposting. Actual REAL science from actual REAL experts in the field of animal husbandry.

Why populations can't be saved by a single breeding pair

The Red List's assessment criteria are based on the so-called "50/500 rule". This states that to avoid inbreeding depression (the loss of "fitness" due to genetic problems), an effective population size of at least 50 individuals in a population is required.

To avoid eroding evolutionary potential (the ability of a population to evolve to cope with future environmental changes), an effective population of at least 500 is required.

Just because there is a male and female, doesn't mean they are going to WANT to reproduce. They can get really picky. Females engage in 'sexual selection', often refusing male mates as not being good enough for them.
Animal Reproduction Strategies

"relatively few males mate successfully'. Apparently females are very picky and more often than not REJECT the male attempting to mate.
Mating Systems In Sexual Animals

Mating habits of a lot of animals are very important and if they can't engage in their habits, they won't reproduce. Certain frogs, for example, have to mate in shallow pools of water or they won't do it. Where did Noah find shallow pools of water for frogs.
Mating Habits of Animals