Transgender women banned from sports is one thing. Banned from chess! Now it's getting silly.

a reply to: PorkChop96

That's the thing, your questions are open questions, they bring open answer you don't understand the context in which i answered your question or just dont like, them not my problem.

Try closed questions, they might work better with closed minds

Im sorry for wasting your time...

a reply to: Terpene

Again with the back handed insults....you're just a skipping record aint ya?

You actively avoid the questions I ask you and then flip it back on me that I don't "understand your answers". Do people actually think you are intelligent, or do you just try to play mind games with them as well and make them think you are as smart as you think you are?

Try answering questions as they are asked to you and then we can have a discussion. no more backhanded, runabout answers that do nothing but make you look like the condescending jackass you tend to be

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: PorkChop96

That's the thing, your questions are open questions, they bring open answer you don't understand the context in which i answered your question or just dont like, them not my problem.

Try closed questions, they might work better with closed minds

Im sorry for wasting your time...

I call it straw grasping.

a reply to: quintessentone

I call it what it is, one user avoiding answering questions they don't have the answer to. Even though they claim humans are "defined in more ways than sexual reproduction" , they have nothing to go to after that so they refer to backhanded insults and attempting to make themselves appear to have the "upper and"

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

I call it what it is, one user avoiding answering questions they don't have the answer to. Even though they claim humans are "defined in more ways than sexual reproduction" , they have nothing to go to after that so they refer to backhanded insults and attempting to make themselves appear to have the "upper and"

You always do this ask questions that have no relevance to the thread topic...you are the one that goes off on tangents and the questions you pose from those tangents are to be ignored, if only to stay on topic.

originally posted by: McGinty
Frakking insane!

Physical sports of course need to be gender seperated, with trans having their own category that they can enter if they’d don’t wanna compete against their birth gender athletes.

But chess!!! FFS, no separation whatsoever is needed.

If women are intellectually equal to men (which of course they are) then men, women and trans should all play one another, best brain wins!

Humans are really starting to do my head in

Bravo! Truth right here folks.

a reply to: quintessentone

How are the questions I ask off topic if they are in direct reference to a comment that another user has made?

Just because one or two users can't seem to understand a simple question when asked, makes me think it's more on their cognitive dissonance, rather than on me for asking "off topic" questions.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: quintessentone

It has everything to do with it.

The different chemical balances experienced by men and women since birth have a huge part in our development, which in turn effects behavior. The foundation of this is our genetics, which are determined at inception. These psychological effects driven by hormones manifest into things like levels of competitiveness, agree-ability, stress management and so forth which are pertinent to understanding the decision making process when playing chess. As i said, it's a nuanced discussion and we can't even agree on the definitions of the word man and woman. I'm sure there would be a more interesting debate should some members actually engage their brains rather than playing the fool.

All of that does not matter because a study proved that when chess is played anonymously by both or any gender expression no one gender expression proved to be superior.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

How are the questions I ask off topic if they are in direct reference to a comment that another user has made?

Just because one or two users can't seem to understand a simple question when asked, makes me think it's more on their cognitive dissonance, rather than on me for asking "off topic" questions.

You think your questions are not understood, they are understood all too well and it's your 'go to' narrative that you always try to lean on when you can't stay on topic.

a reply to: quintessentone

Again, how is asking a question directed at the comment of another user "off topic"?

See how you glance right over the SIMPLE questions?

If that is considered "off topic", wouldn't that mean the original comment was "off topic"?

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Again, how is asking a question directed at the comment of another user "off topic"?

See how you glance right over the SIMPLE questions?

You jump away from the main topic to an obscure topic, thinking it is based on another's comments, but it never is. You gloss over others' comments and then 'go to' your narrative.

a reply to: quintessentone

So asking a question based on a comment in a thread is going off topic? Cool, guess we are all off topic all of the time. We should all be banned

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

So asking a question based on a comment in a thread is going off topic? Cool, guess we are all off topic all of the time. We should all be banned

In future, don't expect me to answer all your questions when you go off on a tangent, it's just tiring...banning or not.

a reply to: quintessentone

I'm not asking you to answer off topic questions.

I'm asking you to answer questions that I have with your answer to someone else questions. Not sure why the two of you are having such a hard time understanding that.

Do I need to break it down and make it a little simpler for you to understand?

Here lets try this;

1. you ask a question, or answer someone else question.
2. I ask you a question based on your answer to said previously mentioned question, or question you asked yourself
3. You claim I am off topic for asking said question


Seems like you don't understand what "off topic" is, but okay I am the issue here

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: AlienBorg

The science study bears out reality but hey you do your reality and good luck with that.

It seems you didn't understand my question or didn't want to answer it on purpose. I will display it again

If science and research were the main driving forces then what kind of science and research allowed transwomen in female sports in the first place? The answer is NONE!
They found their way in sports and female spaces via activism, politicians, and politics.

So, these kind of politics seem to be rectified as a large number of sports have banned transwomen from female competitions. Even if it's a beauty competition there is no place for men in them.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

So asking a question based on a comment in a thread is going off topic? Cool, guess we are all off topic all of the time. We should all be banned

In future, don't expect me to answer all your questions when you go off on a tangent, it's just tiring...banning or not.

You still gonna get exhausted as you have admitted so many times. Going around in various online sites and trying to excuse and support the transgender ideology doesn't seem to work well when you rely on baseless beliefs, whataboutism, and various appeals for further 'research' and denialism of facts.

Get your head around the new blow to the trans ideology, this time from the chess federation...

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: AlienBorg

more garbage without a single shred of proof... talk about fantasy land...



why do fully transitioned man keep their women's chess titles?

It seems you don't read the articles, you're just a headline parrot without any depth at all...

There can be no fully transitioned man...
There is no scientific basis on 'transitioning' and it's physically impossible to transition. The garbage and gibbering is coming from your side.

I do read the articles but you don't read anything related to science. What the law recognises as a woman for the purpose of civil rights isn't the sane as what a woman is biologically.

Do you really have any valid arguments apart from trying the strawman with legal 'definitions'?

I suppose not...

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: PorkChop96

That's the thing, your questions are open questions, they bring open answer you don't understand the context in which i answered your question or just dont like, them not my problem.

Try closed questions, they might work better with closed minds

Im sorry for wasting your time...

Your wasting your time I am afraid.
All of your arguments are either strawman, off topic, or appealing to emotions.
Take a look of how many times you have been refuted but you still continue as you don't really care.

But no matter what you do it doesn't change the fact even chess has now banned transwomen (men) from female competitions. Really hurts quite a lot and as it goes every sport and female competition will be banning transwomen in the future (many sports have already done so).

One blow after another for the trans agenda.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Grenade

The word is defined by a W, followed by o, then m, next would be a and finally n.

The legal documents define your gender, no need for my interpretation that has no baring in the legal world...

Hope that helps.

Legal documents don't define your gender but allow you some rights and the right to define yourself as the gender you wish to be.

Only chromosomes define your gender as sex=gender and despite the crusades by trans activists to argue they're different.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Grenade

A man is somone who can show me his passport and it sais man for their gender marker, a women would be someone with women noted as her gender in their passport.

Unfortunately for your argument, before a judge I'm right.

Sometimes laws are unnatural, suck it up buttercup...

A man is what?!
A woman is what?!

A man is someone who can show you his passport and his gender marker?!

You could receive a prize or even a medal for such definition. Not even the best trans activists have come up with such an absurd 'definition'

Perhaps you could forward your definition to the chess federation and other sports governing bodies. You never know, they may lift all bans against transwomen!