It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: MisguidedAngel
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MisguidedAngel
Actually one of the main reasons, if not the main reason Russia invaded was to protect the Ethnic Russian Ukrainians in Donbass and other Eastern Ukrainian areas who the Ukrainian army, Ukrainian Azovs and Nazis had been attacking and slaughtering since 2014.
By that sort of logic, America should invade the UK to return Northern Ireland to the Irish.
Internal matters are not really the concern of other nations
That's not even CLOSE to same type of logic, not even close.
The same type of logic would be if Millions of American citizens or citizens with American parents/grandparents all lived in one area of Canada. Let's just say Alberta, Canada has 20 million citizens and 95% of them are American or atleast have American parents. In Alberta where all these Americans live, they live with all their American customs (I know Canadian and American customs are essentially the same but for argument sake), they haven't adopted into the Canadian culture. Groups of Canadian Nationalists don't like the Americans, they don't like that they won't drop their American customs, they don't like that they won't live the "Canadian way". The Canadian Nationalists while being backed by the Canadian government launch an attack on the Americans that all live together in Alberta. The Americans fight back but are overpowered by the Canadian army and Nationalists.
Since the USA IS next door to Canada they see that the Americans living in Canada are getting attacked and slaughtered.
You don't think the USA would send armed forces to Canada to protect all the millions of Americans living together in the same part of Canada??
Of course they would. The US sends armed forces across the world to protect a handful of Americans at American embassies, they would surely protect millions of Americans that are under attack.
I got a question based on your misguided theory.
How come if millions and millions of ethnic Russian were being attacked in Ukraine, more refugees from Ukraine ended up in NATO-aligned countries instead of Russia?
one would think if that many citizens were upset about the treatment of the Ukrainian government, they would have went to the country they shared a 1000 km border instead of going further west to NATO and European countries.
In other words, in a country of 42 million, the 2.8 million that went to Russia is a little over 6%
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
Either way didn't Putin just lose 25,000 fighters ?
It depends which day of the official narrative we believe. A few days ago the "Ukraine is winning by a landslide!" narrative had the Wagner group decimated down to about 5,000 troops.
Yesterday, when the narrative needed to be that they had a serious chance at overthrowing Putin, they suddenly were 25,000 strong, with no explanation of the disparity. They just hope no one notices they contradicted themselves for the 500th time.
originally posted by: MisguidedAngel
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: MisguidedAngel
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MisguidedAngel
Actually one of the main reasons, if not the main reason Russia invaded was to protect the Ethnic Russian Ukrainians in Donbass and other Eastern Ukrainian areas who the Ukrainian army, Ukrainian Azovs and Nazis had been attacking and slaughtering since 2014.
By that sort of logic, America should invade the UK to return Northern Ireland to the Irish.
Internal matters are not really the concern of other nations
That's not even CLOSE to same type of logic, not even close.
The same type of logic would be if Millions of American citizens or citizens with American parents/grandparents all lived in one area of Canada. Let's just say Alberta, Canada has 20 million citizens and 95% of them are American or atleast have American parents. In Alberta where all these Americans live, they live with all their American customs (I know Canadian and American customs are essentially the same but for argument sake), they haven't adopted into the Canadian culture. Groups of Canadian Nationalists don't like the Americans, they don't like that they won't drop their American customs, they don't like that they won't live the "Canadian way". The Canadian Nationalists while being backed by the Canadian government launch an attack on the Americans that all live together in Alberta. The Americans fight back but are overpowered by the Canadian army and Nationalists.
Since the USA IS next door to Canada they see that the Americans living in Canada are getting attacked and slaughtered.
You don't think the USA would send armed forces to Canada to protect all the millions of Americans living together in the same part of Canada??
Of course they would. The US sends armed forces across the world to protect a handful of Americans at American embassies, they would surely protect millions of Americans that are under attack.
I got a question based on your misguided theory.
How come if millions and millions of ethnic Russian were being attacked in Ukraine, more refugees from Ukraine ended up in NATO-aligned countries instead of Russia?
one would think if that many citizens were upset about the treatment of the Ukrainian government, they would have went to the country they shared a 1000 km border instead of going further west to NATO and European countries.
In other words, in a country of 42 million, the 2.8 million that went to Russia is a little over 6%
42 million people never left Ukraine. The Numb3rs for Russia haven't been updated in about 9 months or so.
The number of refugees leaving Ukraine has slowed somewhat after peaking in March 2022; since then, nearly six million have returned home. Even so, migrant experts warn that Russia’s planned spring offensives could generate up to four million additional refugees in 2023.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MisguidedAngel
Since you claimed that Ukraine built that dam to murder babies, were prove wrong as it was Soviet built in 1956, and no hint of any apology, you will forgive me for taking your posts with a very large pinch of salt.
originally posted by: MisguidedAngel
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MisguidedAngel
Since you claimed that Ukraine built that dam to murder babies, were prove wrong as it was Soviet built in 1956, and no hint of any apology, you will forgive me for taking your posts with a very large pinch of salt.
"Built the dam" or "shutdown the dam" doesn't really matter how I worded it I was driving down the freeway??? The point was that Ukraine TURNED OFF the Crimeans water in 2014 when Crimea joined Russia. That's the whole point, Crimea was NO LONGER getting FRESH WATER from the North Crimean Canal.
UKRAINE shut off the fresh water on their own people is the basis of my post. Whether they built a dam, turned it off or got space aliens to stop the water it really doesn't matter, what matters is they denied their own people Fresh Water
originally posted by: datguy
a reply to: gortex
So, the three have known each other for decades
Putin couldn't send nukes to Lukashenko
Prigozhin sends his troops to Voronezh to pick up the nukes
Then gets to retire in Belarus after delivering nukes to Lukashenko
because, "no more corruption and bureaucracy"
???
did I get that right?
Putin comes across as confident and strong.
Putin's special Il96-300PU (Control Point) aircraft departed Moscow for St Petersburg at 14:16 (Moscow time), according to FlightRadar data. The destination of the aircraft is not indicated, and it disappeared from the tracking system over the Tver area. One of Putin's residences is located in Tver Oblast. Equipment for the control of the Russian Armed Forces is installed on this aircraft.
www.pravda.com.ua...
If the first few minutes of this vid is not fake.
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: MisguidedAngel
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MisguidedAngel
That's not even CLOSE to same type of logic, not even close.
I disagree, plenty of Americans associate with also being Irish, hence following your spurious way of thought, and the track record where the likes of "the troubles" are concerned they would be free to invade the UK to do something about it.
Again, other nations "Internal matters" are not really the concern of anybody else hence what transpired in Ukraine regarding separatists is really none of Russian concern.
It's still not even close, there aren't millions of Americans living in one area over there
However.
Latinos now outnumber non-Hispanic whites in Texas, census data shows
www.nbcnews.com...
You would be Ok if the Hispanics in Texas wanted to be part of Mexico again then ?
Hispanics have no reason to want to separate.
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: MisguidedAngel
Hispanics have no reason to want to separate.
Why would they need to have a reason ? If they just wanted to become part of Mexico that is reason enough.
So i take it you would be ok if they wanted that ?