NASA obvious fake footage

...

a reply to: InachMarbank

That is hardly an answer as to where your impossible glass firmament bell around the Earth came from, who put it there, nor to the reason why it would be there in the first place.

Again there is a substantial body of scientific evidence that disproves this nonsense.

Take for instance satellite imagery, space exploration, and the astronomical and celestial observations we make every day, never mind the real doozy and conundrum, gravity and orbital mechanics.

a reply to: InachMarbank

There is no doubt whatsoever that the tides on Earth are caused by gravitational forces exerted on the planet by the moon, and to a lesser extent the star that our planet orbits.

And only really stupid uninformed people that refuse to accept science and facts would choose to assume otherwise.

a reply to: andy06shake

Who cleans and maintains the glass is my big issue (after taking into account the phenomenal size of the glass)

What about condensation? Would that not be visible from the earth? What about minor cracks or imperfections , would they not be visible from earth ?

Like I said previously believing in heaven is fine but believing in such a astronomical piece of glass is childish

a reply to: UpThenDown



Well, this is it.

The problems associated with such a nonsensical impossible construction are pretty much insurmountable.

As you are perfectly aware, the prevailing scientific view is that the Earth is an oblate spheroid.

And not enclosed by a solid or glass-like anything.

As to the notion being childish, well you can teach and educate children.

But good luck teaching pork that chooses of their own volition to entertain such lunacy.

Who cleans and maintains the glass is my big issue (after taking into account the phenomenal size of the glass)

a reply to: UpThenDown

Hope they are using union labor

Hate to think such a job would be done by scabs .......

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Nothin

ONLY when the science backs it up do I trust anything, and even then i dont trust reuters past when they are backed up by science.

We are all free to believe what we like.

For me : am unable to verify the science, so there is no belief either way.

That Reuters™ article mentioned some random " Experts™ ", then seemed to base the rest of their article on Experts™ from NASA™.

It's just my crazy opinion : but Thems™ are more on the Agenda™ and Narratives™ side, than on the tell it like it is side.

Reuters™ are not in the business of telling it like it is.
NASA™ is not in the business of telling it like it is.

In other words : it's Science™, not science, from my vantage point.

But that's only my limited point-of-view.
Am sure that many are able to see beyond the BS™ filters we see, and see the real science.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Correlation is not causation.

Nothing about the moon pulling water makes sense.

Just look at sea waves, and you can tell that’s a pushing force.

Looks like the object surrounding Heaven and Earth, which rotates once every 24 hours and 50 minutes, is divided into quadrants: 2 stronger and 2 weaker.

a reply to: andy06shake

The only “scientific” evidence contradicting my claims comes from NASA and other space agencies.

a reply to: UpThenDown

Ozone cleans the atmosphere. So do airborne viruses such as SARS COV 2. There’s your cleaning agents from the inside.

From the outside the radiation is so intense no living organism can survive.

Clouds don’t usually form 60 miles high, and that is also too far away to notice imperfections.

Believing in NASA is like believing in Santa Claus.

a reply to: InachMarbank

No mate, centuries of knowledge. Centuries.

a reply to: InachMarbank

So now this magic dome that weighs millions of tons pushes water gently enough to create waves. What doesn’t it do?

Your “quadrants” are doing the exact same thing the moon does, that you claim doesn’t make any sense.

a reply to: InachMarbank

"Ozone cleans the atmosphere. So do airborne viruses such as SARS COV 2. There’s your cleaning agents from the inside."

SARS COV 2?!!!!!!

How come we have to have Window Cleaners?

originally posted by: InachMarbank

Believing in NASA is like believing in Santa Claus.

Ho Ho Ho

originally posted by: InachMarbank
and that is also too far away to notice imperfections.

Telescope, binoculars?

a reply to: InachMarbank

science.jrank.org...

Our knowledge of the relationship between the Moon and tides dates back as early as Pytheas in the third century BC, as refined later by Newton.

No NASA or other space agencies were involved

originally posted by: InachMarbank
a reply to: UpThenDown

Ozone cleans the atmosphere. So do airborne viruses such as SARS COV 2. There’s your cleaning agents from the inside.

From the outside the radiation is so intense no living organism can survive.

Clouds don’t usually form 60 miles high, and that is also too far away to notice imperfections.

Believing in NASA is like believing in Santa Claus.

Yet there is still belief in " Viruses™ " ?

From this vantage-point : it always comes-down to belief-system vs belief-system, zactly like the God vs. Evolution™ threads.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Again, correlation is not causation.

a reply to: InachMarbank

So?

You have no correlation or causation.

Answer the questions you have been asked, please?

a reply to: Nothin

I’m pretty sure viruses are a real thing, because they can be identified, and grown in a lab. Most people accept that as proof. Do you have another explanation for what has been identified as viruses?

I accept as proof that being able to see a double image of the sun, every time and every where one views it at an indirect angle, shows there is glass everywhere in the sky. So far nobody here has proposed any alternate explanation for the double sun optic.