NASA obvious fake footage

a reply to: Zaphod58

If the coils are in contact with the container, will they not heat the container?

a reply to: andy06shake

IMO…

Heaven and Earth are half of the gravitational force.

You have to assume another container much farther away surrounds them to exert the opposing half of the gravitational force.

If the gravitional force isn’t tearing me apart, why the hell would I assume it would tear Heaven apart?

a reply to: InachMarbank

Heaven and Earth are half of the gravitational force.

Sounds like pseudoscientific mumbo-jumbo to me

Please explain?

If the gravitional force isn’t tearing me apart, why the hell would I assume it would tear Heaven apart?

Look at the gravitational and tidal forces our moon exerts on our oceans here on Earth, causing the water to bulge out on both the side closest to the Moon and the side farthest from the Moon.

Now please explain how mere glass in a solid dome could possibly be able to withstand such stress keeping in mind glass is a solid and not a liquid.

Your talking complete and utter nonsense as there is no known glass material in existence that could accommodate such stress.

a reply to: InachMarbank

If they’re in contact with it they will, but it’s not instant. It takes time for it to heat, even more with no transfer medium to heat the air around it. And if the air around was was super cooled, to like -65C, like in the upper atmosphere, it takes even longer.

originally posted by: yuppa
fact check:No dome surrounds the earth

Some say that Reuters™ is Owned™ and Operated™ by the Red-Shield-Dynasty™ ?

Do you think they are trustworthy ?

a reply to: Nothin

ONLY when the science backs it up do I trust anything, and even then i dont trust reuters past when they are backed up by science.

Kubrick knew.

originally posted by: tachyonator9
Kubrick knew.

Turns out there is a thing going around from a MOVIE that is being claimed as Kubrick said he filmed the moon landings. Its a flat out lie and Kubric never said what was claimed.

a reply to: yuppa

So....i have seen a similar mockery video where they talk how they're gonna fake the landing and budget estimation turned out to be more expensive than actually going, funny, and so what.

There is also that fake video of supposed Kubric (not him) "admitting" he faked Apollo. All of that has nothing to do with anything. All that belongs to very very VERY low level of consciousness, # content.

What really matters is that once they showed you Lake Tsiolkovsky like this

And today it officially looks like this

a reply to: InachMarbank

"If the gravitional force isn’t tearing me apart, why the hell would I assume it would tear Heaven apart?"

Probably because you are not a super massive structure made out of glass that encompasses the entire Earth?

originally posted by: InachMarbank
a reply to: andy06shake

Actually around 90 miles high they say the temperature is about 1700 degrees, so just cool enough not to melt this particular glass, fragments of which, can be found in the Libyan desert. You can even order some fragments on Amazon, but they’re not too cheap. Expensive souvenir priced.

Yes, there is Libyan Desert Glass on Amazon, eBay and lots of other sites.

Mostly described as Meteoritic Tektite and not "bits of Heaven'.

Have a look at this:

en.m.wikipedia.org...


"The glass is nearly pure silica which requires temperatures above 1,600 °C to form – hotter than any igneous rock on Earth. However, few mineral relics survived from whatever caused the melting, including a form of quartz called cristobalite, a rarely occurring high-temperature mineral; and grains of the mineral zircon, although most have reacted to form a higher-temperature mineral called zirconia. Ideas about how the glass formed include melting during meteorite impact, or melting caused by an airburst from an asteroid or other object burning up high in Earth's atmosphere.[12]"

Oh dear. So from meteorites or asteroids burning up at temperatures above 1600C high up in the atmosphere.

That got through Heaven.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

There glass is spread across an oval shaped area 130 by 50 miles. There is more than 1000 tonnes of it.

That’s one gigantic meteorite. It didn’t even leave a crater either. Nor did it leave any other traces of meteorite material except for tiny traces inside the pure glass.

Does that seem like a plausible explanation to you?

A more plausible explanation to me sounds like: the reason for meteoritic dust in some of this glass is because it was pressured into it from inside Heaven, not from outside Heaven; there are thousands of tonnes of blasted meteoritic dust that floats about the atmosphere like clouds every year.

A build up of pressure from inside Heaven is also the most plausible explanation for why it cracked.

Excessive CO2 build up would cause increasing pressure

Double

a reply to: Zaphod58

With electromagnetic radiation being everywhere in the thermosphere, and the ISS orbiting in the thermosphere, the ISS must be absorbing that radiation, yes?

a reply to: InachMarbank

There glass is spread across an oval shaped area 130 by 50 miles. There is more than 1000 tonnes of it.

I thought there was a glass firmament around the earth in the shape of a bell?

Your words in other threads.

Earth's circumference is about 24,855 miles.

The dimensions of the planet are a lot more than 130 by 50 miles, so i think you may wish to recalculate those numbers in relation to the amount of glass material required to encompass the planet, and actually understand the kind of nonsense you are proposing.

Put it this way to calculate the amount of glass material required to build a shell around the Earth with say a thickness of 1 foot, and at an altitude of 90 miles, you would need to determine the surface area of the shell and then calculate the volume of glass required.

Anyhoo still waiting for you to explain how "Heaven and Earth are half of the gravitational force"?

a reply to: andy06shake

The prevailing “wisdom” that the moon causes tides can be falsified by simply reading the charts of high and low tides in a specific sea port.

There are high and low tides every 12 hours and 25 minutes, with 2 high and low tides every 24 hours and 50 minutes.

If the pull of the moon caused high and low tides, there would only be 1 high and low tide every 24 hours and 50 minutes.

IMO, there is another huge object all encompassing Heaven and Earth, rotating in the opposite direction, causing the other half of the gravitational force

It is also quite absurd to think the moon pulls all the oceans like some kind of tractor beam. That much force from a concentrated point in the sky would rip everybody apart, sucking them up into the sky like ants into a vacuum cleaner.

a reply to: andy06shake

I never said all of Heaven was shattered. Looks like just a local area was shattered.

a reply to: InachMarbank

The prevailing “wisdom” that the moon causes tides can be falsified by simply reading the charts of high and low tides in a specific sea port.

There are high and low tides every 12 hours and 25 minutes, with 2 high and low tides every 24 hours and 50 minutes.

If the pull of the moon caused high and low tides, there would only be 1 high and low tide every 24 hours and 50 minutes.

Nonsense the moon's gravitational force is indeed responsible for causing tides on Earth.

And the phenomenon can and has been demonstrated through scientific evidence and observations.

The correlation between our moon's position and the occurrence of tides has been extensively observed.

With mathematical models and tidal predictions based on the moon's position and gravitational influence that further support the link between the moon and tides.

And the existence of tidal bulges and the predictable patterns of tides provide substantial evidence that the moon's gravitational force is the primary cause of tides on Earth.

IMO, there is another huge object all encompassing Heaven and Earth, rotating in the opposite direction, causing the other half of the gravitational force

Opinions are one thing InachMarbank but without actual evidence to support your suppositions, they are nothing more than mere fantasy based on feelings rather than fact.

It is also quite absurd to think the moon pulls all the oceans like some kind of tractor beam. That much force from a concentrated point in the sky would rip everybody apart, sucking them up into the sky like ants into a vacuum cleaner.

Yeh, gravity is not a tractor beam, which is nothing more than a concept seen in science fiction.

Gravity is a natural force of attraction that exists between any two objects with mass.

a reply to: InachMarbank

From where, by who, and why?

And don't say God did it, because you don't have any proof of that either.

originally posted by: InachMarbank
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

There glass is spread across an oval shaped area 130 by 50 miles. There is more than 1000 tonnes of it.

That’s one gigantic meteorite. It didn’t even leave a crater either. Nor did it leave any other traces of meteorite material except for tiny traces inside the pure glass.

Does that seem like a plausible explanation to you?

A more plausible explanation to me sounds like: the reason for meteoritic dust in some of this glass is because it was pressured into it from inside Heaven, not from outside Heaven; there are thousands of tonnes of blasted meteoritic dust that floats about the atmosphere like clouds every year.

A build up of pressure from inside Heaven is also the most plausible explanation for why it cracked.

Excessive CO2 build up would cause increasing pressure

based on the calculations i did in regards to your glass dome theory its a piece of glass (singular, no seams) weighing in at 402,123,860,000 tonnes

I am pretty certain no such piece of glass could be engineered by anyone and let alone maintained for millenia

surely, surely you can accept that as fact?

you can still believe in heaven but not a piece of glass of such size and weight, that is just farcical and something only a child would believe