The moment the trans agenda goes off the rails thread

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: stevieray

lol

They're shifting, changing definitions now all over the place.

I still use the term "illegal alien" and "guy in a dress".

Obviously!
Transgenderism is a linguistic movement with no basis in science.

Tell me scientifically how heterosexuals are made the way they are.

By other heterosexuals.

AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You don’t have to be heterosexual to procreate.

The ‘equipment’ still works the same way.

Oh Lordy. . .

hetero Is Greek for other or different.

A sperm still has to fertilize an egg. Sperm only can come from males, and only women can produce eggs.

No matter how you slice it, you gotta do the Horizontal Mamba to make a baby.

What makes homosexual men incapable of doing that?

Well, homosexual men have sperm and ummm. . . . sperm.

?

Keep going, Mr. Scientist.

Your post stated men.

Two men or three or four. . . cannot make a baby.

You need a a female and a male, thus hetero.

QED

No no no no no. You went off track. I told you to keep going. No mention of gay orgies, please, even if you want to share that fantasy with us so badly.

An attempt to use sexual proclivities as an insult?


I'm sure this reflects well on your integrity.....

He insulted our intelligence. So gloves' off. Sorry buddy.

Oh, this isn't about insults, infact, I happen to know that the Bimbo is rather adept at such cognitive sparring.

However, you happened to use an entire group of people that you wished to bring him down to, the inference being that homosexuality is a lower form of human.

Well done.

And yet bringing down an entire group to the level of predators is perfectly all right with you? Tells me all I need to know about you.

Who is doing that?

Do you think that I believe that all trans people are groomers?
Do you think that I believe that all gay people are groomers?

Can you please quote it.

Hint: I tend to call people trying to manipulate children groomers. My logic is odd like that.

Did you just jump in defending those that are doing that?

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI
Stay away from kids.

That was quick. Didn't have to go back and find your posts.

Thank you. And thank you for owning it.

Still waiting for your proof please.

I've shown your words as it relates to the groomer aspect.

Proof for what? That people can change their biological sexes? I've stated that it's impossible over and over again. No clue why you people aren't listening to me.

hmm...

It does not matter the term. Transgender individuals start to recognize their opposite genders as early as 3. Sexes are fixed. Genders can be fluid.

a reply to: ABlackCat

I went over that in previous posts you mocked.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: stevieray

lol

They're shifting, changing definitions now all over the place.

I still use the term "illegal alien" and "guy in a dress".

Obviously!
Transgenderism is a linguistic movement with no basis in science.

Tell me scientifically how heterosexuals are made the way they are.

By other heterosexuals.

AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You don’t have to be heterosexual to procreate.

The ‘equipment’ still works the same way.

Oh Lordy. . .

hetero Is Greek for other or different.

A sperm still has to fertilize an egg. Sperm only can come from males, and only women can produce eggs.

No matter how you slice it, you gotta do the Horizontal Mamba to make a baby.

What makes homosexual men incapable of doing that?

Well, homosexual men have sperm and ummm. . . . sperm.

?

Keep going, Mr. Scientist.

Your post stated men.

Two men or three or four. . . cannot make a baby.

You need a a female and a male, thus hetero.

QED

No no no no no. You went off track. I told you to keep going. No mention of gay orgies, please, even if you want to share that fantasy with us so badly.

An attempt to use sexual proclivities as an insult?


I'm sure this reflects well on your integrity.....

He insulted our intelligence. So gloves' off. Sorry buddy.

Oh, this isn't about insults, infact, I happen to know that the Bimbo is rather adept at such cognitive sparring.

However, you happened to use an entire group of people that you wished to bring him down to, the inference being that homosexuality is a lower form of human.

Well done.

And yet bringing down an entire group to the level of predators is perfectly all right with you? Tells me all I need to know about you.

Who is doing that?

Do you think that I believe that all trans people are groomers?
Do you think that I believe that all gay people are groomers?

Can you please quote it.

Hint: I tend to call people trying to manipulate children groomers. My logic is odd like that.

Did you just jump in defending those that are doing that?

Quote it please.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI
Stay away from kids.

That was quick. Didn't have to go back and find your posts.

Thank you. And thank you for owning it.

Still waiting for your proof please.

I've shown your words as it relates to the groomer aspect.

Proof for what? That people can change their biological sexes? I've stated that it's impossible over and over again. No clue why you people aren't listening to me.

hmm...

It does not matter the term. Transgender individuals start to recognize their opposite genders as early as 3. Sexes are fixed. Genders can be fluid.

Yes? If you have a hard time with reading comprehension, I can help you. No problem.

a reply to: ABlackCat

No, I have a problem with the utter absurdity and depraved mind that believes that a 3 year old can determine their gender.

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: ABlackCat

I went over that in previous posts you mocked.

All you did was creating a circular argument. "There is trans agenda because there is transgender agenda. There is a need because there is a need."

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: ABlackCat

No, I have a problem with the utter absurdity and depraved mind that believes that a 3 year old can determine their gender.

How do you explain the phenomenon? BTW, nothing is being done to that child at that point except possibility counseling

a reply to: ABlackCat

Absolutely not what I did whatsoever.

But I know you don't care so...

You wouldn't happen to be a Vladimir Nabokov fan would you?

a reply to: ABlackCat

How do you explain the phenomenon?

Why don't you explain it to me like i'm 5. Or....3

BTW, nothing is being done to that child at that point except possibility counseling

False. The child is having outside forces impressed upon it by people that arguably are supposed to be protecting them.

originally posted by: ABlackCat
I feel a moderator warning coming soon.

At least I feel I get a fair shake under the new owners.

Unlike before.

I was going to make a thread so this comment doesn't get lost in the stream of back and forth insults but there doesn't need to be yet another trans thread, so here it goes. I've made a few posts in-line with some conservatives but in general I don't think being trans is a bad thing.

It doesn't hurt anyone. If a biological man wants to wear a bikini or one piece instead of a speedo -why should they be ashamed? Why encourage children to cutoff their body parts to fit into our culture's image of what a person should look like?

But yet it's treated as wrong - even by people who are supposed to be trans supporters. They "meaning the current left" want to make it an insult and maybe even illegal to distinguish a transwoman from a biological woman?

Why erase the distinction? Why make someone give up who they are? People can still be respected without erasing distinctions?

They should be proud of exactly who they are - they aren't a biological woman - they are something unique.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: ABlackCat

How do you explain the phenomenon?

Why don't you explain it to me like i'm 5. Or....3

I've explained many times. Transgender children are born that way.

False. The child is having outside forces impressed upon it by people that arguably are supposed to be protecting them.

Dad - "Hey Sarah! Yes that's your new name. Why don't you follow your mother and dress like her and throw like a girl or play with a Barbie doll?"

Do you understand how dumb that sounds? Go outside the box and take a look inward. You'll see how dumb your narrative is.

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: ABlackCat

Absolutely not what I did whatsoever.

But I know you don't care so...

You wouldn't happen to be a Vladimir Nabokov fan would you?

How would you know about that novel?

a reply to: ABlackCat

I've explained many times. Transgender children are born that way.

So you won't back up your allegations and now you won't substantiate your claims. Yet won't think twice about tossing around insults that deride a community you recently used to support your "virtue."

Laughable.

Dad - "Hey Sarah! Yes that's your new name. Why don't you follow your mother and dress like her and throw like a girl or play with a Barbie doll?"

Do you understand how dumb that sounds? Go outside the box and take a look inward. You'll see how dumb your narrative is.

Yes, what you just typed is very dumb, I agree.

Although I don't see how it references anything I've said to you.

a reply to: Daughter2

Adults are free to do as they wish.

No argument.

a reply to: ABlackCat

I was told it was a great book, before knowing what it was about.

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: ABlackCat

I was told it was a great book, before knowing what it was about.

I know of the book. However your insult didn't work.

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Daughter2

Adults are free to do as they wish.

No argument.

No $#*+, Sherlock?

*yawn*

Care to address the above?