The moment the trans agenda goes off the rails thread

I’m over the STUCK ARCHAIC.

My 15-year-old and most of his friends just say they’re Open.

I think that’s amazing.

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Turquosie
a reply to: network dude

Well, as long as kids aren't being encouraged to transition before 18, I don't see the big deal considering that any teenager with internet access can find out information about being trans pretty easily.

Perhaps if the left just agrees to leaving surgery and hormone treatment to 18+ and not pushing trans women in women's sports, then we can move on to more important subjects

That's all ANYONE was asking for.

SHEESH!

I don't think we need to have strict laws only for minors. Do you know how many confused and vulnerable adults are out there?

Transitioning should become a very difficult process under law. There should be massive fines and indictments of a criminal nature for the people behind this phenomenon, and I mean the pharmaceuticals. They're pushing non stop this agenda for profit by destroying the lives of children and adults.

They can do whatever they want as adults.

After 18, it's nobody's business but theirs.

originally posted by: Annee
I’m over the STUCK ARCHAIC.

My 15-year-old and most of his friends just say they’re Open.

I think that’s amazing.

No. It isn't

originally posted by: matafuchs
This is why things being promoted as cool to kids is wrong...

Link

Latest data outlines between 2010 and 2023, identification as LGBTQI+ has almost tripled among the student body at the Providence, Rhode Island, university (from 14 percent in 2010 saying they were not heterosexual to 38 percent now).

“The Herald’s Spring 2023 poll found that 38% of students do not identify as straight — over five times the national rate ,” student newspaper reported. “Over the past decade, LGBTQ+ identification has increased across the nation, with especially sharp growth at Brown.”

Other sexual orientations have also increased over the same period at the seventh-oldest institution of higher education in the United States, with some observers countering the rise is driven by social pressures rather than sexual choices and noting bisexual identification outstrips bisexual sexual activity.

Indoctrination
Brainwashing
Woke schools
Social contagion
Latest 'fashion'

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels

They changed the definition under political pressure. Being gay was considered a mental illness for decades before they changed it.

It was for a long time and I agree there was also political pressure, but the reality is that abnormal behaviors are not also mental illness by default unless there is a negative effect as a part of it. With being gay there is no actual negative part to it and gay people can have a happy long life like anyone else.

But as I said before, trans isn't a behavior. It's an alternate reality the person has created, and that is a totally different event compared to something that may be seen as an abnormal behavior.

originally posted by: matafuchs
This is why things being promoted as cool to kids is wrong...

Link

Latest data outlines between 2010 and 2023, identification as LGBTQI+ has almost tripled among the student body at the Providence, Rhode Island, university (from 14 percent in 2010 saying they were not heterosexual to 38 percent now).

“The Herald’s Spring 2023 poll found that 38% of students do not identify as straight — over five times the national rate ,” student newspaper reported. “Over the past decade, LGBTQ+ identification has increased across the nation, with especially sharp growth at Brown.”

Other sexual orientations have also increased over the same period at the seventh-oldest institution of higher education in the United States, with some observers countering the rise is driven by social pressures rather than sexual choices and noting bisexual identification outstrips bisexual sexual activity.

Yep, tendy club it is, and how dare you not join in!

a reply to: Annee

The Stuck Archaic. Please. They are "Open".... you mean confused and acting a part.

It is not amazing. A person coming out and saying they are gay and embracing and living the lifestyle...ok. That is difficult. All of these kids are marginalizing those who are truly gay.

a reply to: matafuchs

I remember being a kid, back in the 60's and 70's. We were all confused, sometimes we wanted to be James Bond (Sean Connery) other times we wanted to be rock stars, other times we just didn't have a clue.

That's normal.

I'm just glad we didn't have adults TELLING us what we were.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I was born in 71. You knew the kids in school who were gay. No one really cared. If someone picked on them you told that person to stop and they were usually in the closet as we would say. There were drag shows but none of them wanted kids there. Kids have no money. Drag shows are for tips. There were transsexuals and transvestites. It is nothing new. There was no national emergency.

Now they are teaching kids, in grade school, to 'choose' a sexual orientation they like. It is sick. It is peverse and anyone who supports it is more than likely abused themselves at some point.

originally posted by: Annee
I’m over the STUCK ARCHAIC.

My 15-year-old and most of his friends just say they’re Open.

I think that’s amazing.

I remember when every 15 year old girl wanted to be Pat Benatar.

They ended up not becoming the popular idea of the moment

originally posted by: matafuchs

I was born in 71. You knew the kids in school who were gay. No one really cared. If someone picked on them you told that person to stop and they were usually in the closet as we would say. There were drag shows but none of them wanted kids there. Kids have no money. Drag shows are for tips. There were transsexuals and transvestites. It is nothing new. There was no national emergency.

Now they are teaching kids, in grade school, to 'choose' a sexual orientation they like. It is sick. It is peverse and anyone who supports it is more than likely abused themselves at some point.

I really think the whole gay-bashing narrative had a level of hyperbole to it too. I graduated HS in 1978 and no one cared about gays we also knew who happen to be gay and some were very popular. It's the same old story of a bunch of football players hunting down gays to beat up, too cliché. My 28 years in the military were the same too in we knew who was gay and it really didn't bother anyone.

The part that people are not understanding in all this that I have talked about before is the hypersexuality people seem to have created as they spend a good amount of their consensus thoughts thinking about it to a level it overwhelms them as a major point in their lives.

I don't think about my heterosexuality at all outside of thinking about having sex, but I don't plan my waking moments around a constant thought of sexuality. I know a good number of gays and they are the same in their sexuality doesn't lead their lives. The problem is what we have been seeing are people that are obsessed with their sexuality and that by itself can be a mental illness too that manifests in different ways. Makes me wonder about the teachers and administrators that want to push sexuality to kids if it isn't because of their own obsessive issues with it.

originally posted by: wdkirk

originally posted by: Annee
I’m over the STUCK ARCHAIC.

My 15-year-old and most of his friends just say they’re Open.

I think that’s amazing.

I remember when every 15 year old girl wanted to be Pat Benatar.

They ended up not becoming the popular idea of the moment

When was that.

And how does that relate to anything.

originally posted by: Turquosie
a reply to: network dude

Well, as long as kids aren't being encouraged to transition before 18, I don't see the big deal considering that any teenager with internet access can find out information about being trans pretty easily.

Perhaps if the left just agrees to leaving surgery and hormone treatment to 18+ and not pushing trans women in women's sports, then we can move on to more important subjects

that is EXACTLY what we are asking for. Only that. We all seem to be of the mind that what folks do in private is their business, keep it private and it's all good. And stay away from the kids. It seems too damn simple.

a reply to: Annee

so you have never seen "Fast times at Ridgemont High"?

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Annee

so you have never seen "Fast times at Ridgemont High"?

It’s so representative of real life.

a reply to: Annee

You still haven't answered the most basic question! Can you change your sex?

originally posted by: AlienBorg
a reply to: Annee

You still haven't answered the mist basic question! Can you change your sex?

AGAIN — you are an answer dictator.

You’ve deemed what the only answer will be — and reject anything else.

There are many things science knows exist that they do not have answers for.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: AlienBorg
a reply to: Annee

You still haven't answered the mist basic question! Can you change your sex?

AGAIN — you are an answer dictator.

You’ve deemed what the only answer will be — and reject anything else.

There are many things science knows exist that they do not have answers for.

Hmmm...do you know the meaning of whataboutism?

You've dodged the question again.

Can you change your sex?

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: AlienBorg
a reply to: Annee

You still haven't answered the mist basic question! Can you change your sex?

AGAIN — you are an answer dictator.

You’ve deemed what the only answer will be — and reject anything else.

There are many things science knows exist that they do not have answers for.

Hmmm...do you know the meaning of whataboutism?

You've dodged the question again.

Can you change your sex?

It’s not a question I have any interest in — in regards to transgender.

You are your brain, not your wrappings.

Of course you are going to reject my answer.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Annee

so you have never seen "Fast times at Ridgemont High"?

It’s so representative of real life.

I graduated in 87. it was exactly like my teenage years. I was closer to Spichole than Mark, but it was an epic representation of those times. So in a rare post, I totally agree with you and the two people who stared you.