It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Turquosie
a reply to: DBCowboy
Just curious, is there any reason you wouldn't consider a third party independent for POTUS (possibly Tulsi Gabbard). An independent who hasn't flip flopped multiple times based on corporate interests and has plans to improve the U.S.
Not saying Tulsi or other third party options are perfect (or even close) but it seems like a far better option than the U.S. going down this path of each side voting based on hate for the other side.. Trump and Biden will just bring further division with half the country wanting nothing to do with them.
Why not, for once, step away from the madness of the two-party system and give an independent a shot. Maybe they can actually get some positive things done..
originally posted by: LittleJake
The republicans in congress are not going to stop the criminality, that is certain. The only thing to stop this now, it's regrettable to say, is open rebellion.
Crap, I didn't want to say that, but the democrats must be stopped one way or the other before total destruction is complete and, at this point, it has to be up to the people to defend and restore our republic.
I just really don't understand why people so desperately want Trump elected. Sure, he's not Biden, but a lot of other candidates aren't Biden either. I feel like voters have tunnel vision and can't think beyond the box media has put them in.
originally posted by: Turquosie
a reply to: DBCowboy
For one, not sure how clear I have to make this, Iv'e never advocated for Biden or Hillary. Just because I don't kiss Trump's feet doesn't mean I like the DNC.
And you keep blaming everything on the left. And Iv'e seen leftists blame everything on the right. You guys (political loyalists) are all the same. You want to have a clear enemy you can blame everything on so you don't have to accept that Biden or Trump have done a sh!t job at uniting the country.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Turquosie
I just really don't understand why people so desperately want Trump elected. Sure, he's not Biden, but a lot of other candidates aren't Biden either. I feel like voters have tunnel vision and can't think beyond the box media has put them in.
You keep saying this.
And I keep telling you that the populist movement is where the real change comes from.
You dont want that, you dont want change
You want your status quo.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: DBCowboy
This is a fair and understandable post given how you nornally seem to lean politically.
Are.you open to the possibility that Trump broke the law or laws as POTUS or after his term ended? If the proof shows that then wouldnt ignoring it be an assualt on a core concept of the US?
Make no mistake about it, if proof shows the current POTUS is guilty of similar crimes or anything else then he needs to be removed immediately. He then needs to face the full outcome of his crimes
What I hope this does is wakes up botn parties as candidates like Trump and Biden are not what this country needs.
Let me ask you a question; did Hillary obstruct justice with her 33,000 emails and smashing phones and wiping hardrives?
What does it matter what I believe if the rule of law is not applied equally?
Was she found guilty of committing a crime?
If so then she should have been seneteneced.
If Trump is found guilty of a crime then he should be senteneced.
If Biden is found guilty of a crime then he should be sentenced.
...exactly the kind of opinion that is driven by partisan hackery.
The problem is the two tier justice system, which means some people get indicted when others don't.
It's got nothing to do with convictions.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: DBCowboy
This is a fair and understandable post given how you nornally seem to lean politically.
Are.you open to the possibility that Trump broke the law or laws as POTUS or after his term ended? If the proof shows that then wouldnt ignoring it be an assualt on a core concept of the US?
Make no mistake about it, if proof shows the current POTUS is guilty of similar crimes or anything else then he needs to be removed immediately. He then needs to face the full outcome of his crimes
What I hope this does is wakes up botn parties as candidates like Trump and Biden are not what this country needs.
Let me ask you a question; did Hillary obstruct justice with her 33,000 emails and smashing phones and wiping hardrives?
What does it matter what I believe if the rule of law is not applied equally?
Was she found guilty of committing a crime?
If so then she should have been seneteneced.
If Trump is found guilty of a crime then he should be senteneced.
If Biden is found guilty of a crime then he should be sentenced.
...exactly the kind of opinion that is driven by partisan hackery.
The problem is the two tier justice system, which means some people get indicted when others don't.
It's got nothing to do with convictions.
If you say so, I have never deviated in saying borh parties have failed this country.
originally posted by: Turquosie
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Turquosie
I just really don't understand why people so desperately want Trump elected. Sure, he's not Biden, but a lot of other candidates aren't Biden either. I feel like voters have tunnel vision and can't think beyond the box media has put them in.
You keep saying this.
And I keep telling you that the populist movement is where the real change comes from.
You dont want that, you dont want change
You want your status quo.
Except I do want change. I don't see how reelecting Trump will do so, especially when half the country absolutely does not want that. And he was already elected once and there was not massive changes.
Changing the status quo is not relecting past politicians from the same two-party system IMO.
If Trump made major changes to the political system, or at least tried to remove corporate lobbying and money from politics and actually "clear the swamp", I could understand. But he did not, at least significantly. And while I understoud Trump was initially elected because he was an outsider promising such change, he did not fulfill that promise. Time for something new.