Multiple Victims Reported in Texas Mall Mass Shooting

originally posted by: Mahogany

originally posted by: infolurker
They won't say what has happened yet. Appears a mass shooter started popping off at an outlet mall in Texas. They have already started with the gun rhetoric. This one shall be interesting.

Oh no, have they? Gun rhetoric? Oh no!

God forbid some snowflake gets their feelings hurt over wanting background checks so Americans aren't mowed down by military rifles daily.

Look, I'm a gun owner. I carry concealed. But we can do better than this BS. Much, much better.

We can have rights and better regulation. There can be both.

How can you be that dumb to think a background check would prevent mass shootings. Most mass shooters purchased the firearms themselves legally. You claim to be a gun owner while at the same time calling AR-15 "military weapons". How are you that clueless about firearms.

Firearms save more lives in America than they take. How you going to keep guns out of evil people hands without making it very difficult and expensive for law abiding gun owners to have them.


What regulations are you talking about. Let us hear. I bet you will just spew democrat talking points.

a reply to: Fairtrade141

Or this guy was researching his enemy, working himself up.

I had a Facebook contact who was a black dude who was linked in to Christian Identity, so he could share examples of their racist hate.

originally posted by: Echo007

originally posted by: Mahogany

originally posted by: infolurker
They won't say what has happened yet. Appears a mass shooter started popping off at an outlet mall in Texas. They have already started with the gun rhetoric. This one shall be interesting.

Oh no, have they? Gun rhetoric? Oh no!

God forbid some snowflake gets their feelings hurt over wanting background checks so Americans aren't mowed down by military rifles daily.

Look, I'm a gun owner. I carry concealed. But we can do better than this BS. Much, much better.

We can have rights and better regulation. There can be both.

Most mass shooters purchased the firearms themselves legally.

"legally" is a big leap for this. I would venture to say that most of the, more recent, active shooters have been under some sort of mental care. Which is they signed on their background check that they were, they would have been automatically denied the sale. And it they said they weren't, but were, that is now an illegal purchase.

To add, I will go ahead and put this out there to show some numbers that will shed some light on what guns are actually being used in these crimes.

Did he work at all for G4S?

as for identity, I think Mauricio Garcia would be a HIspanic Name.

a reply to: matafuchs

Mauricio Garcia?

Maybe the guy identifies as a white supremacist... It's the only explanation, right?

Because you know the MSM is blaming it on white supremacists.

a reply to: shaemac

PM4U

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Whiskermegistus

originally posted by: DBCowboy
We should immediately kill every active shooter.

2nd.

Well , where were all the conceal/open cary heroes of Texas in all of this ?
Texas is one giant gun toting State & I thought carrying guns deters crime ?

Well, apparently not in the "gun free zone".

I guess they were respecting the owners wishes of not being in the shooting gallery, I mean "gun free zone".

Why didn't the signs work?

Since when do Texans follow business rules on conceal cary ?
Texas for all it’s “ an armed society is a peaceful society “ sure has been failing in epic manners .
AR 15s need to go .

a reply to: Whiskermegistus

AR 15s need to go .

No.


For reasons you seem to not comprehend.

So you just keep at it sport.

a reply to: Whiskermegistus

Take a look at my previous comment about statistics for gun usage in mass shootings, AR-15s are not the problem. (No gun is the problem really, but why use logic)

Technically, if a business has a gun free zone sign out and you use a firearm, even to defend said business, they can have you arrested. It is a game that us gun owners don't play.

It is a peaceful society, when the legal firearm owners are allowed to use them to defend the society when the gun laws fail. But instead, they want to keep shoving more and more legislation down our throats that is ultimately going to make us the bad guys, without guns, and the real bad guys will still have them.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Whiskermegistus

AR 15s need to go .

No.


For reasons you seem to not comprehend.

So you just keep at it sport.

So if the government uses the military against the public , how are AR 15s going to stop them .
Were is your vertically integrated supply chains of ammunition , food & fuel to fight a modern military ?
What communication systems will you use to coordinate your country wide revolution ?
I support the 2A , but AR 15s & AK-47s serve no real practical use in society, other than for adult boys & their Rambo fantasies.
All this last stand & over my dead body stuff from the right is predictable as well laughable.
If you want AR type weapons then you should have to carry a federal stamp on them just like advanced weapons do .
You are an aging boomer with a computer who can’t accept that the world has & is leaving your type of mentality in the dust.
Don’t you have contrails to photograph or drones to count hovering over your house ?
You are from Militiagan so I get it

originally posted by: Whiskermegistus

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Whiskermegistus

AR 15s need to go .

No.


For reasons you seem to not comprehend.

So you just keep at it sport.

I support the 2A , but AR 15s & AK-47s serve no real practical use in society

"I support the 2A, but I don't support the 2A" Your argument is as weak as your ideology.

What do you consider to be "advanced weapons"?

Have you ever looked at the statistics of guns per human being in America? There are roughly 326 million people in America, with just around 393-400 million firearms. Then you take into account how much ammunition most of those guys have for each one, that number could be in the billions.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Whiskermegistus

Take a look at my previous comment about statistics for gun usage in mass shootings, AR-15s are not the problem. (No gun is the problem really, but why use logic)

Technically, if a business has a gun free zone sign out and you use a firearm, even to defend said business, they can have you arrested. It is a game that us gun owners don't play.

It is a peaceful society, when the legal firearm owners are allowed to use them to defend the society when the gun laws fail. But instead, they want to keep shoving more and more legislation down our throats that is ultimately going to make us the bad guys, without guns, and the real bad guys will still have them.

So you are telling me that had a man been carrying a Glock 10mm against the wishes of the mall & greased that mass shooter , he would be prosecuted in Texas for it ?
Get real & accept that 9 times out of 10 the rogue attacker has the advantage & conceal cary is not that effective in stopping violence, because I can guarantee you that there were armed citizens in that mall .
Texas is a walking contradiction & the top 10 out of 17 of the most deadly mass shootings in America were done with AR/AK semiautomatic rifles. So the AR 15 is a problem.

a reply to: Whiskermegistus

Ever hunt feral hog? ARs are good for that.

originally posted by: Whiskermegistus

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Whiskermegistus

AR 15s need to go .

No.


For reasons you seem to not comprehend.

So you just keep at it sport.

So if the government uses the military against the public , how are AR 15s going to stop them .
Were is your vertically integrated supply chains of ammunition , food & fuel to fight a modern military ?
What communication systems will you use to coordinate your country wide revolution ?
I support the 2A , but AR 15s & AK-47s serve no real practical use in society, other than for adult boys & their Rambo fantasies.
All this last stand & over my dead body stuff from the right is predictable as well laughable.
If you want AR type weapons then you should have to carry a federal stamp on them just like advanced weapons do .
You are an aging boomer with a computer who can’t accept that the world has & is leaving your type of mentality in the dust.
Don’t you have contrails to photograph or drones to count hovering over your house ?
You are from Militiagan so I get it

I get it. I don't understand it but I get it. It's ok to be a sheep.

Without the sheep there's no reason for the sheepdog.

Remember though, if the sheep interferes with sheepdogs duties, the sheep will get bit.

Graze on little sheep, graze on baa baa.

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: Whiskermegistus

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Whiskermegistus

AR 15s need to go .

No.


For reasons you seem to not comprehend.

So you just keep at it sport.

I support the 2A , but AR 15s & AK-47s serve no real practical use in society

"I support the 2A, but I don't support the 2A" Your argument is as weak as your ideology.

What do you consider to be "advanced weapons"?

Have you ever looked at the statistics of guns per human being in America? There are roughly 326 million people in America, with just around 393-400 million firearms. Then you take into account how much ammunition most of those guys have for each one, that number could be in the billions.

Do you know how fast 5000 rds disappear in an AR 15 ?
So fat out of shape tacticol men are going to stop the military ? Im delusional ? LMAO
You & 20 armed weekend warriors wouldn’t last an hour in West Garfield Park Chicago against gangsters with keltechs .

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Whiskermegistus

Ever hunt feral hog? ARs are good for that.

No problem , just have a federal stamp for your hog killing LaRue

a reply to: Whiskermegistus

First off, nobody in their right mind would carry a 10mm for CC.

Second, I am not saying they would 100% be arrested. If the owner of the business is that much of an a$$, then yes he could have you arrested for having a firearm in a gun free zone.

Take a look at this guy sometime, Elisjsha Dicken.

You are talking about Allen, Tx. That is in the DFW area, and one of the bluest areas in the state.

And since you might have missed it when I pointed it out earlier, here is the breakdown of "mass shootings" by gun up to mid 2019, again:


I could probably find one more up to date if you would like. Or if you would rather, you could show some number to back up your outlandish claims.

a reply to: Whiskermegistus

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

a reply to: Whiskermegistus

Matter of fact I do, and done efficiently can take out your "gangsters" with keltechs. Not a problem

I think you vastly underestimate the number of retired vets that would definitely sign up to do this dirty work.

But as I said, "I support 2A, but I don't support 2A". We get it, you want to be part of the fad but don't want to actually do your part to support it. Understood, baa baa

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Whiskermegistus

First off, nobody in their right mind would carry a 10mm for CC.

Second, I am not saying they would 100% be arrested. If the owner of the business is that much of an a$$, then yes he could have you arrested for having a firearm in a gun free zone.

Take a look at this guy sometime, Elisjsha Dicken.

You are talking about Allen, Tx. That is in the DFW area, and one of the bluest areas in the state.

And since you might have missed it when I pointed it out earlier, here is the breakdown of "mass shootings" by gun up to mid 2019, again:

I could probably find one more up to date if you would like. Or if you would rather, you could show some number to back up your outlandish claims.

Since 2012 the top 10 of the top 17 most deadly mass shootings were done with civilian models of the M16 period & end of discussion.
I carried a Glock 29 for years , until I woke up & realised that it was stupid to cary a gun around daily.