It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tacoman101
a reply to: quintessentone
I'm glad you have the ability to form a opinion.. Congrats
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: tacoman101
a reply to: quintessentone
I'm glad you have the ability to form a opinion.. Congrats
What do they say when a person has to resort to insults during a debate/discussion? Oh yeah, see your posts.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: tacoman101
a reply to: quintessentone
I'm glad you have the ability to form a opinion.. Congrats
What do they say when a person has to resort to insults during a debate/discussion? Oh yeah, see your posts.
Are you someone that administers the shots? It seems like this legislation should have you worried.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3
This bill won't get passed in the House because what if the patient insists on having an mNRA vaccination are they going to charge both the patient and the person giving the shot? And won't they have to charge the government too for providing the mNRA vaccinations to whomever? It's ridiculous.
You seem to be getting concerned. I wonder why?!
It looks that Florida is trying to ban the mRNA products and Idaho making an offence to administer them.
Your dogma and narratives are under serious threat. Prey!
I will always be concerned with people pushing misinformation or just stupidity - deny ignorance.
You seem to be getting concerned. I wonder why?!
It looks that Florida is trying to ban the mRNA products and Idaho making it an offence to administer them.
Not the best possible result for your dogma and narratives.
For a little levity, here's what one democrat says about these two republicans - "Legislators once again practicing medicine without a license." LOL
You are confusing science with politics.
Try again.
You seem to be getting concerned. I wonder why?!
It looks that Florida is trying to ban the mRNA products and Idaho making it an offence to administer them.
Not the best possible result for your dogma and narratives.
My dogma and narratives is believing in the science from immunologists, virologists and others that actually work with vaccines and study viruses not believing in people who try to twist data into their vaccine skeptical confirmation bias'.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: tacoman101
a reply to: quintessentone
I'm glad you have the ability to form a opinion.. Congrats
What do they say when a person has to resort to insults during a debate/discussion? Oh yeah, see your posts.
Are you someone that administers the shots? It seems like this legislation should have you worried.
Those two Republican lawmakers should be worried because of ridiculousness.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3
This bill won't get passed in the House because what if the patient insists on having an mNRA vaccination are they going to charge both the patient and the person giving the shot? And won't they have to charge the government too for providing the mNRA vaccinations to whomever? It's ridiculous.
You seem to be getting concerned. I wonder why?!
It looks that Florida is trying to ban the mRNA products and Idaho making an offence to administer them.
Your dogma and narratives are under serious threat. Prey!
I will always be concerned with people pushing misinformation or just stupidity - deny ignorance.
You seem to be getting concerned. I wonder why?!
It looks that Florida is trying to ban the mRNA products and Idaho making it an offence to administer them.
Not the best possible result for your dogma and narratives.
For a little levity, here's what one democrat says about these two republicans - "Legislators once again practicing medicine without a license." LOL
You are confusing science with politics.
Try again.
You seem to be getting concerned. I wonder why?!
It looks that Florida is trying to ban the mRNA products and Idaho making it an offence to administer them.
Not the best possible result for your dogma and narratives.
My dogma and narratives is believing in the science from immunologists, virologists and others that actually work with vaccines and study viruses not believing in people who try to twist data into their vaccine skeptical confirmation bias'.
You never believe in what others have to say. Even if they are experts. You can trust them up to a certain degree and that's all. Science is not a religion and scientists are not priests.
There is also bad science and bad scientists and given your admitted dogma i.e to believe and accept uncritically what it has been peddled by the official lines you seem to have made the same mistake as many others.
You were fooled to believe that these products were safe and effective. That was the official narrative not backed by science.
At the moment we speak Florida thinking to ban these products and Idaho is trying to make it illegal to administer them. The UK is pausing their distribution for the under 50s.
You do understand that the facts speak for themselves and it's obvious why they try to ban them or making difficult to get them.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone
Lots of crazies try to get crazy legislation passed.
Let's see if these guys manage to do that.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone
Lots of crazies try to get crazy legislation passed.
Let's see if these guys manage to do that.
originally posted by: tacoman101
a reply to: quintessentone
only to people who i absolutely loath.. you see you know nothing about me but i've been reading you're "trash" for a while now..
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3
This bill won't get passed in the House because what if the patient insists on having an mNRA vaccination are they going to charge both the patient and the person giving the shot? And won't they have to charge the government too for providing the mNRA vaccinations to whomever? It's ridiculous.
You seem to be getting concerned. I wonder why?!
It looks that Florida is trying to ban the mRNA products and Idaho making an offence to administer them.
Your dogma and narratives are under serious threat. Prey!
I will always be concerned with people pushing misinformation or just stupidity - deny ignorance.
You seem to be getting concerned. I wonder why?!
It looks that Florida is trying to ban the mRNA products and Idaho making it an offence to administer them.
Not the best possible result for your dogma and narratives.
For a little levity, here's what one democrat says about these two republicans - "Legislators once again practicing medicine without a license." LOL
You are confusing science with politics.
Try again.
You seem to be getting concerned. I wonder why?!
It looks that Florida is trying to ban the mRNA products and Idaho making it an offence to administer them.
Not the best possible result for your dogma and narratives.
My dogma and narratives is believing in the science from immunologists, virologists and others that actually work with vaccines and study viruses not believing in people who try to twist data into their vaccine skeptical confirmation bias'.
You never believe in what others have to say. Even if they are experts. You can trust them up to a certain degree and that's all. Science is not a religion and scientists are not priests.
There is also bad science and bad scientists and given your admitted dogma i.e to believe and accept uncritically what it has been peddled by the official lines you seem to have made the same mistake as many others.
You were fooled to believe that these products were safe and effective. That was the official narrative not backed by science.
At the moment we speak Florida thinking to ban these products and Idaho is trying to make it illegal to administer them. The UK is pausing their distribution for the under 50s.
You do understand that the facts speak for themselves and it's obvious why they try to ban them or making difficult to get them.
If those facts/data are misinterpreted then they do not speak for themselves.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3
"Science is not a religion and scientists are not priests."
Obviously. They don't claim to be anything of the sort.
Religion is neither provable or backed by scientific analysis. It's a matter of faith.
Yet anti vaxxers have a belief set akin to religious fervour?
You are engaging in anti vaxxer apologetics and denialism of reality.
Just an observation.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3
"Science is not a religion and scientists are not priests."
Obviously. They don't claim to be anything of the sort.
Religion is neither provable or backed by scientific analysis. It's a matter of faith.
Yet anti vaxxers have a belief set akin to religious fervour?
You are engaging in anti vaxxer apologetics and denialism of reality.
Just an observation.