"Non Binary" Teacher CAUGHT GROOMING Class In Front of Parents!

Findings?
Who funded their "study"? Soros?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
What are you talking about?
There is no such argument, that is just sick!

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Must be difficult for faith, gay and trans to all exist for you.

I do enjoy when you post your opinions.

People exist.

All kinds of people.

The only thing that has denied the variety of people for years is -- archaic restrictive manmade rules of society.

We are evolving beyond those restrictions. As we should.

Mental health problems exist.

Arguably more now than ever before.

You arent evolving.

In fact youre devolving. As is evidenced by attempting to convince anyone that biology suddenly doesnt exist.

Or that gay folks cant have a faith.

Or, and to the topic, that grooming children is acceptible.

Gays, transgender, non-binary have always been.

Only archaic rules of society denied their rights to exist in society.

Calling it a mental problem is ignorance.

Go on, finish.......

Tell us that not wanting kids groomed is ignorant and surely not a mental problem..

Go on now.

I do not consider it grooming -- -that is just the title used on this thread.

To me it is learning to accept all people.

Even pedos.


But not those nasty Jesus and God people......

Aye?

Pedos have a victim.

God is man made.

Not so...pedophilia is a...well here:

Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Pedophelia

No victim is needed for that definition!

As far as God being man made...well...God would disagree with that too!

How can I disagree with a manmade idol?

I am aware of what a Pedophile is -- and that there are several categories.

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

A minor cannot consent to a sexual act. Therefore - if acted upon -- there is a victim.

Guess you weren't around when those 2 scientists published their paper on Pedophilia Orientation.

It didn't go well for them.

Does not mean they were wrong.

Wow. I guess nothing wrong is wrong anymore.

Are you a scientist?

Are you denied publishing and punished because your findings are not acceptable to "society"?

Let me remind you of Galileo.

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
Findings?
Who funded their "study"? Soros?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
What are you talking about?
There is no such argument, that is just sick!

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Must be difficult for faith, gay and trans to all exist for you.

I do enjoy when you post your opinions.

People exist.

All kinds of people.

The only thing that has denied the variety of people for years is -- archaic restrictive manmade rules of society.

We are evolving beyond those restrictions. As we should.

Mental health problems exist.

Arguably more now than ever before.

You arent evolving.

In fact youre devolving. As is evidenced by attempting to convince anyone that biology suddenly doesnt exist.

Or that gay folks cant have a faith.

Or, and to the topic, that grooming children is acceptible.

Gays, transgender, non-binary have always been.

Only archaic rules of society denied their rights to exist in society.

Calling it a mental problem is ignorance.

Go on, finish.......

Tell us that not wanting kids groomed is ignorant and surely not a mental problem..

Go on now.

I do not consider it grooming -- -that is just the title used on this thread.

To me it is learning to accept all people.

Even pedos.


But not those nasty Jesus and God people......

Aye?

Pedos have a victim.

God is man made.

Not so...pedophilia is a...well here:

Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Pedophelia

No victim is needed for that definition!

As far as God being man made...well...God would disagree with that too!

How can I disagree with a manmade idol?

I am aware of what a Pedophile is -- and that there are several categories.

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

A minor cannot consent to a sexual act. Therefore - if acted upon -- there is a victim.

Guess you weren't around when those 2 scientists published their paper on Pedophilia Orientation.

It didn't go well for them.

Does not mean they were wrong.

Wow. I guess nothing wrong is wrong anymore.

Are you a scientist?

Are you denied publishing and punished because your findings are not acceptable to "society"?

Let me remind you of Galileo.

Does it matter who funded their studies?

They were forced to recant.

Again -- let me remind you of Galileo.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
What are you talking about?
There is no such argument, that is just sick!

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Must be difficult for faith, gay and trans to all exist for you.

I do enjoy when you post your opinions.

People exist.

All kinds of people.

The only thing that has denied the variety of people for years is -- archaic restrictive manmade rules of society.

We are evolving beyond those restrictions. As we should.

Mental health problems exist.

Arguably more now than ever before.

You arent evolving.

In fact youre devolving. As is evidenced by attempting to convince anyone that biology suddenly doesnt exist.

Or that gay folks cant have a faith.

Or, and to the topic, that grooming children is acceptible.

Gays, transgender, non-binary have always been.

Only archaic rules of society denied their rights to exist in society.

Calling it a mental problem is ignorance.

Go on, finish.......

Tell us that not wanting kids groomed is ignorant and surely not a mental problem..

Go on now.

I do not consider it grooming -- -that is just the title used on this thread.

To me it is learning to accept all people.

Even pedos.


But not those nasty Jesus and God people......

Aye?

Pedos have a victim.

God is man made.

Not so...pedophilia is a...well here:

Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Pedophelia

No victim is needed for that definition!

As far as God being man made...well...God would disagree with that too!

How can I disagree with a manmade idol?

I am aware of what a Pedophile is -- and that there are several categories.

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

A minor cannot consent to a sexual act. Therefore - if acted upon -- there is a victim.

Guess you weren't around when those 2 scientists published their paper on Pedophilia Orientation.

It didn't go well for them.

Does not mean they were wrong.

Wow. I guess nothing wrong is wrong anymore.

Are you a scientist?

Are you denied publishing and punished because your findings are not acceptable to "society"?

Let me remind you of Galileo.

I don’t need to be a scientist to know that wrong is wrong. These conversations are good for one thing. To let people like me know who NOT to let there kids around.

Senseless remark.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
Findings?
Who funded their "study"? Soros?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
What are you talking about?
There is no such argument, that is just sick!

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Must be difficult for faith, gay and trans to all exist for you.

I do enjoy when you post your opinions.

People exist.

All kinds of people.

The only thing that has denied the variety of people for years is -- archaic restrictive manmade rules of society.

We are evolving beyond those restrictions. As we should.

Mental health problems exist.

Arguably more now than ever before.

You arent evolving.

In fact youre devolving. As is evidenced by attempting to convince anyone that biology suddenly doesnt exist.

Or that gay folks cant have a faith.

Or, and to the topic, that grooming children is acceptible.

Gays, transgender, non-binary have always been.

Only archaic rules of society denied their rights to exist in society.

Calling it a mental problem is ignorance.

Go on, finish.......

Tell us that not wanting kids groomed is ignorant and surely not a mental problem..

Go on now.

I do not consider it grooming -- -that is just the title used on this thread.

To me it is learning to accept all people.

Even pedos.


But not those nasty Jesus and God people......

Aye?

Pedos have a victim.

God is man made.

Not so...pedophilia is a...well here:

Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Pedophelia

No victim is needed for that definition!

As far as God being man made...well...God would disagree with that too!

How can I disagree with a manmade idol?

I am aware of what a Pedophile is -- and that there are several categories.

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

A minor cannot consent to a sexual act. Therefore - if acted upon -- there is a victim.

Guess you weren't around when those 2 scientists published their paper on Pedophilia Orientation.

It didn't go well for them.

Does not mean they were wrong.

Wow. I guess nothing wrong is wrong anymore.

Are you a scientist?

Are you denied publishing and punished because your findings are not acceptable to "society"?

Let me remind you of Galileo.

Does it matter who funded their studies?

They were forced to recant.

Again -- let me remind you of Galileo.

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
What are you talking about?
There is no such argument, that is just sick!

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Must be difficult for faith, gay and trans to all exist for you.

I do enjoy when you post your opinions.

People exist.

All kinds of people.

The only thing that has denied the variety of people for years is -- archaic restrictive manmade rules of society.

We are evolving beyond those restrictions. As we should.

Mental health problems exist.

Arguably more now than ever before.

You arent evolving.

In fact youre devolving. As is evidenced by attempting to convince anyone that biology suddenly doesnt exist.

Or that gay folks cant have a faith.

Or, and to the topic, that grooming children is acceptible.

Gays, transgender, non-binary have always been.

Only archaic rules of society denied their rights to exist in society.

Calling it a mental problem is ignorance.

Go on, finish.......

Tell us that not wanting kids groomed is ignorant and surely not a mental problem..

Go on now.

I do not consider it grooming -- -that is just the title used on this thread.

To me it is learning to accept all people.

Even pedos.


But not those nasty Jesus and God people......

Aye?

Pedos have a victim.

God is man made.

Not so...pedophilia is a...well here:

Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Pedophelia

No victim is needed for that definition!

As far as God being man made...well...God would disagree with that too!

How can I disagree with a manmade idol?

I am aware of what a Pedophile is -- and that there are several categories.

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

A minor cannot consent to a sexual act. Therefore - if acted upon -- there is a victim.

Guess you weren't around when those 2 scientists published their paper on Pedophilia Orientation.

It didn't go well for them.

Does not mean they were wrong.

Wow. I guess nothing wrong is wrong anymore.

Are you a scientist?

Are you denied publishing and punished because your findings are not acceptable to "society"?

Let me remind you of Galileo.

I don’t need to be a scientist to know that wrong is wrong. These conversations are good for one thing. To let people like me know who NOT to let there kids around.

Wrong? You are not a scientist -- but have determined they are wrong because you think it's wrong.

You don't like it. It is unacceptable to you -- therefore these scientists are wrong.

Got it.

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
Senseless remark.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
Findings?
Who funded their "study"? Soros?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
What are you talking about?
There is no such argument, that is just sick!

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Must be difficult for faith, gay and trans to all exist for you.

I do enjoy when you post your opinions.

People exist.

All kinds of people.

The only thing that has denied the variety of people for years is -- archaic restrictive manmade rules of society.

We are evolving beyond those restrictions. As we should.

Mental health problems exist.

Arguably more now than ever before.

You arent evolving.

In fact youre devolving. As is evidenced by attempting to convince anyone that biology suddenly doesnt exist.

Or that gay folks cant have a faith.

Or, and to the topic, that grooming children is acceptible.

Gays, transgender, non-binary have always been.

Only archaic rules of society denied their rights to exist in society.

Calling it a mental problem is ignorance.

Go on, finish.......

Tell us that not wanting kids groomed is ignorant and surely not a mental problem..

Go on now.

I do not consider it grooming -- -that is just the title used on this thread.

To me it is learning to accept all people.

Even pedos.


But not those nasty Jesus and God people......

Aye?

Pedos have a victim.

God is man made.

Not so...pedophilia is a...well here:

Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Pedophelia

No victim is needed for that definition!

As far as God being man made...well...God would disagree with that too!

How can I disagree with a manmade idol?

I am aware of what a Pedophile is -- and that there are several categories.

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

A minor cannot consent to a sexual act. Therefore - if acted upon -- there is a victim.

Guess you weren't around when those 2 scientists published their paper on Pedophilia Orientation.

It didn't go well for them.

Does not mean they were wrong.

Wow. I guess nothing wrong is wrong anymore.

Are you a scientist?

Are you denied publishing and punished because your findings are not acceptable to "society"?

Let me remind you of Galileo.

Does it matter who funded their studies?

They were forced to recant.

Again -- let me remind you of Galileo.

What I responded to was senseless.

Including your response.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
What are you talking about?
There is no such argument, that is just sick!

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Must be difficult for faith, gay and trans to all exist for you.

I do enjoy when you post your opinions.

People exist.

All kinds of people.

The only thing that has denied the variety of people for years is -- archaic restrictive manmade rules of society.

We are evolving beyond those restrictions. As we should.

Mental health problems exist.

Arguably more now than ever before.

You arent evolving.

In fact youre devolving. As is evidenced by attempting to convince anyone that biology suddenly doesnt exist.

Or that gay folks cant have a faith.

Or, and to the topic, that grooming children is acceptible.

Gays, transgender, non-binary have always been.

Only archaic rules of society denied their rights to exist in society.

Calling it a mental problem is ignorance.

Go on, finish.......

Tell us that not wanting kids groomed is ignorant and surely not a mental problem..

Go on now.

I do not consider it grooming -- -that is just the title used on this thread.

To me it is learning to accept all people.

Even pedos.


But not those nasty Jesus and God people......

Aye?

Pedos have a victim.

God is man made.

Not so...pedophilia is a...well here:

Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Pedophelia

No victim is needed for that definition!

As far as God being man made...well...God would disagree with that too!

How can I disagree with a manmade idol?

I am aware of what a Pedophile is -- and that there are several categories.

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

A minor cannot consent to a sexual act. Therefore - if acted upon -- there is a victim.

Guess you weren't around when those 2 scientists published their paper on Pedophilia Orientation.

It didn't go well for them.

Does not mean they were wrong.

Wow. I guess nothing wrong is wrong anymore.

Are you a scientist?

Are you denied publishing and punished because your findings are not acceptable to "society"?

Let me remind you of Galileo.

I don’t need to be a scientist to know that wrong is wrong. These conversations are good for one thing. To let people like me know who NOT to let there kids around.

Wrong? You are not a scientist -- but have determined they are wrong because you think it's wrong.

You don't like it. It is unacceptable to you -- therefore these scientists are wrong.

Got it.

Note to self. Never let children around Annee.

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: snrb123

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
What are you talking about?
There is no such argument, that is just sick!

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Must be difficult for faith, gay and trans to all exist for you.

I do enjoy when you post your opinions.

People exist.

All kinds of people.

The only thing that has denied the variety of people for years is -- archaic restrictive manmade rules of society.

We are evolving beyond those restrictions. As we should.

Mental health problems exist.

Arguably more now than ever before.

You arent evolving.

In fact youre devolving. As is evidenced by attempting to convince anyone that biology suddenly doesnt exist.

Or that gay folks cant have a faith.

Or, and to the topic, that grooming children is acceptible.

Gays, transgender, non-binary have always been.

Only archaic rules of society denied their rights to exist in society.

Calling it a mental problem is ignorance.

Go on, finish.......

Tell us that not wanting kids groomed is ignorant and surely not a mental problem..

Go on now.

I do not consider it grooming -- -that is just the title used on this thread.

To me it is learning to accept all people.

Even pedos.


But not those nasty Jesus and God people......

Aye?

Pedos have a victim.

God is man made.

Not so...pedophilia is a...well here:

Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Pedophelia

No victim is needed for that definition!

As far as God being man made...well...God would disagree with that too!

How can I disagree with a manmade idol?

I am aware of what a Pedophile is -- and that there are several categories.

There is argument that it is a sexual orientation -- but if you claim that as a scientist -- it will get you fired - etc.

A minor cannot consent to a sexual act. Therefore - if acted upon -- there is a victim.

Guess you weren't around when those 2 scientists published their paper on Pedophilia Orientation.

It didn't go well for them.

Does not mean they were wrong.

Wow. I guess nothing wrong is wrong anymore.

Are you a scientist?

Are you denied publishing and punished because your findings are not acceptable to "society"?

Let me remind you of Galileo.

I don’t need to be a scientist to know that wrong is wrong. These conversations are good for one thing. To let people like me know who NOT to let there kids around.

Wrong? You are not a scientist -- but have determined they are wrong because you think it's wrong.

You don't like it. It is unacceptable to you -- therefore these scientists are wrong.

Got it.

Note to self. Never let children around Annee.

I am a 76-year-old grandmother with 2 daughters and 3 grandchildren.

Try again.

a reply to: Lucidparadox

"And you.. and your kids will have to interact with and live amongst them eventually at some point whether you like ot or not."

Uh, well, actually, no we and our "kids" don't have to interact with them. I've been in situations where I was put in the position of having to "interact" with one of them and I just walked away. I refuse to acknowledge them and I don't speak to them.

People still get to choose who they interact with.

I just want to share this in general for discussion purposes:

TOP 10 BLUNDERS IN SCIENCE

I'm not a scientist and have not published any works...but I agree that these 10 blunders prove science makes a mistake now and then!

Imagine if they weren't recanted...wow...that might be interesting!

a reply to: Annee


And? So are many other child abusers. My statement stands.

originally posted by: snrb123
a reply to: Annee


And? So are many other child abusers. My statement stands.

No.

They're just not ignorant.

originally posted by: jerryznv
I just want to share this in general for discussion purposes:

TOP 10 BLUNDERS IN SCIENCE

I'm not a scientist and have not published any works...but I agree that these 10 blunders prove science makes a mistake now and then!

Imagine if they weren't recanted...wow...that might be interesting!

And who exactly determines a science paper is a blunder?

Not all sites that call themselves Science are credible.

The one you've linked to: is "Independent Journalism". Basically Op-Eds.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv
I just want to share this in general for discussion purposes:

TOP 10 BLUNDERS IN SCIENCE

I'm not a scientist and have not published any works...but I agree that these 10 blunders prove science makes a mistake now and then!

Imagine if they weren't recanted...wow...that might be interesting!

And who exactly determines a science paper is a blunder?

I don't know...like I said...I'm not a scientist or have any published works!

Want me to Google it for you?

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv
I just want to share this in general for discussion purposes:

TOP 10 BLUNDERS IN SCIENCE

I'm not a scientist and have not published any works...but I agree that these 10 blunders prove science makes a mistake now and then!

Imagine if they weren't recanted...wow...that might be interesting!

And who exactly determines a science paper is a blunder?

I don't know...like I said...I'm not a scientist or have any published works!

Want me to Google it for you?

NO -- just something I've learned over the many years I've been here.

Many "Science" sites aren't really legit science. They are mostly Op-Eds.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jerryznv
I just want to share this in general for discussion purposes:

TOP 10 BLUNDERS IN SCIENCE

I'm not a scientist and have not published any works...but I agree that these 10 blunders prove science makes a mistake now and then!

Imagine if they weren't recanted...wow...that might be interesting!

And who exactly determines a science paper is a blunder?

I don't know...like I said...I'm not a scientist or have any published works!

Want me to Google it for you?

NO -- just something I've learned over the many years I've been here.

Many "Science" sites aren't really legit science. They are mostly Op-Eds.

Well...this isn't my first day either!

You should know that if you want answers...go get them!

Science is peer reviewed and accepted or debunked! You of all people know how this works!

Please don't insult me or play me as stupid!

I've learned a thing or two in my years here also!

On that note Annee...I have yet to see you post a link to anything your claiming!

a reply to: Annee
Meet Anne.
Defender of Pedophilia Orientation.
Not a defender of disagreeing with Pedophilia Orientation.
She’s gets it!

originally posted by: snrb123
a reply to: Annee
Meet Anne.
Defender of Pedophilia Orientation.
Not a defender of disagreeing with Pedophilia Orientation.
She’s gets it!

Where did I say I defended anything?

I made a statement of fact.

Feel free to search the internet -- there is discussion on it.

originally posted by: jerryznv

On that note Annee...I have yet to see you post a link to anything your claiming!

I am not going to post a link to these 2 scientists. It was years ago.

You can search the internet if you choose to -- on this subject.

a reply to: Annee

I made a statement of fact.

False.