-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions ---WHO WILL PUT AN END TO THE ENDLESS?--- -Part- --42--

a reply to: Thoughtful1

And two Hemi's also, cold n hot so warm overall nowadays ?, moon samish though, often see some members forget hemisphere's

So a 4100 page spending bill is presented at 0130am. By the time to vote it would require reading 4 pages per minute for 16 hours straight without break

Secondly, the longest government shutdown was 18-19 when trump asked for 5 billion for the wall (pretty sure this is what Schumer and Pelosi were so giddy about the other day). Yet if this bill passed we will have spent 100 billion (650 dollars per every tax paying American) on the war in Ukraine

Looks like the world didn't forget after all.
From: wbtv.com

BERLIN (AP) — A German court on Tuesday convicted a 97-year-old woman of being an accessory to more than 10,000 murders for her role as a secretary to the SS commander of the Nazis’ Stutthof concentration camp during World War II.

Irmgard Furchner was accused of being part of the apparatus that helped the camp near Danzig, now the Polish city of Gdansk, function. The Itzehoe state court in northern Germany gave her a two-year suspended sentence for being an accessory to murder in 10,505 cases and an accessory to attempted murder in five cases.

The court said judges were convinced that Furchner “knew and, through her work as a stenographer in the commandant’s office of the Stutthof concentration camp from June 1, 1943, to April 1, 1945, deliberately supported the fact that 10,505 prisoners were cruelly killed by gassings, by hostile conditions in the camp,” by transportation to the Auschwitz death camp and by being sent on death marches at the end of the war.

“The promotion of these acts by the accused took place through the completion of paperwork” in the camp commander’s office, a court statement said. “This activity was necessary for the organization of the camp and the execution of the cruel, systematic acts of killing.”

So how is this any different than George Soros' activities during the war?
From: newrepublic dated January 9, 1994

Soros’s memories of this time are contradictory. He is capable of offering a hope-and-glory rendition of the Holocaust. “In many ways it was the happiest year of my life,” he will say. “It was dangerous and exciting. It made me a bit of a risk-taker. And I got to see my father at his very best.” Other times, he recalls it rather less brightly. He explained, for example, his aversion to financing Jewish organizations with an anecdote from the early days of the roundup of Hungarian Jews:

The Jewish Council asked the little kids to hand out the deportation notices. I was told to go to the Jewish Council. And there I was given these small slips of paper. It was three or four lines. It said report to the rabbi seminary at 9 a.m. tomorrow morning. Bring a blanket and food for twenty-four hours. And I was given a list of names. I took this piece of paper to my father. He instantly recognized it, you see. This was a list of Hungarian Jewish lawyers. He said, “You deliver the slips of paper and tell the people that if they report they will be deported.” I’m not sure to what extent he knew they were going to be gassed. I did what my father said.

But lets not forget this from George Soros as well,
From: canadafreepress

During an interview with “Sixty Minute’s” Steve Kroft, Soros was asked about his “best year:”
KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who
swore that you were his adopted godson.

SOROS: Yes. Yes.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.

SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.

KROFT: I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the
psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?

SOROS: Not, not at all. Not at all.

KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

SOROS: No.

Of course he didn’t feel guilty. Soros has the moral depth of a clam. Nonetheless, he has said, “my goal is to become the conscience of the world.”

Why does this matter? Well, it's because it showed that George Soros knew that what he was doing was bad (his dad explained this to him), and that he did it anyways because he felt like he was above the rest of the world. If he gets nabbed for his war crimes (which I doubt, but still he could) then he'll hang for it.

Oh and if you wanted to watch that 60-minute interview it's been both archived as well as sitting in a ton of places around the internets.

a reply to: PeteMitchell
And they had 10 months to get the omni written and up for review but didn't have it ready in Sept so they voted to give themselves more time and then try to sneak it in right before the break and in the middle of the night!

a reply to: RookQueen

At least it wasn't a classic Pelosi, "You have to vote for it to read it" move.

I honestly do not know how to reach the dem voters with this information until someone finds a way to get this into the MSM.
I have talked with 3 democrats this week, 1 that voted for Trump because she knew HRC was a POS. I brought up Fauchi, the creation of the virus, the danger of the jabs, the sexualization of our children from the trannies, the southern border, etc and she had not heard anything on what I brought into the conversation. It was the same with the other 2 liberals that I spoke with, and one said she would need to see it on the news to believe it! The one that voted for Trump in 2016 voted for Biden in 2020. She said she didn't like the way he treated people. I was a little irritated at this point and said ya know the Presidency isn't and shouldn't be a popularity contest and I didn't always like his interactions with people but he didn't do anything to harm the US and her response was "Yeah but he would have in 2020 if congress hadn't stopped him". She said he downplayed the severity of the virus and could have gotten people killed." I then informed her that ivermectin, Vit.D & C, and hydroxychloroquine actually did effectively treat the virus, but your idiot socialist leaders censored and suppressed the science and medical fields from telling the truth about the virus and the jab. That was when she injected the "I'll have to see it to believe it". I said the truth is out there but you're not going to see it on abc, nbc, cbs or cnn but it is out there and one day you're going to apologize to me for blowing me off as a looney conspiracy theorist and that's okay Im patient....
When Fauchi and the nature of the virus came up she proceeds to tell me that China created it, and it really was at the wet market and that there really was bat dna found in the virus...lol I shook my head and said "none of that proves that the US didn't fund the creation of this scary virus. They've proved GOF which means it was bioterrorism that YOU paid for! Then it was released on the world killing people all over the globe until a vax was produced and forced on the citizens of this earth without any proof that it worked and in fact more people died in 2021 and 2022 than did in 2020. How do you explain that? Doesn't that make you a tiny bit suspicious that there may have been more to the entire debacle? Her response " well yeah but I haven't heard about any of that stuff"......I told her I'd send her some info. I'm going to send her some of Dr. Malones interviews but do any of you have suggestions as to what else I can send to pique her interest without overloading her initially? I'd like to ease her into it........

Just had an insight... Darkest night of the year... followed by DayBREAK
= DARK TO LIGHT

but also the dawn after darkest night of the year = FLASH_BREAK_ from Q365:

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 82d434 No.121327 📁
Dec 18 2017 23:27:52 (EST)
FLASH_BREAK_
/* / /*
Shall we play a game?
Map is critical to understand.
Future unlocks past.
DECLAS_ATL_(past).
News unlocks map.
Find the markers.
10 & [10].
12/7 – 12/17.
Concourse F.
Terminal 5.
Private_operated plane (OP)?
ATL -> IAD
Extraction/known.
Dark.
Darkness.
Learn double meanings.
SHUTDOWN.
Q/POTUS-1
Q/POTUS-2
Q/POTUS-3
Q/POTUS-4 [10]
Q/POTUS-5
“Special Place”
Why are drops highlighted by POTUS shortly thereafter?
Coincidence or message?
“The Great Awakening”
POTUS today.
Unlock?
CLAS_OP_IAD_(future).
How about a nice game of chess?
SPLASH.
FOX THREE.
Q

originally posted by: RookQueen

I honestly do not know how to reach the dem voters with this information until someone finds a way to get this into the MSM.
I have talked with 3 democrats this week, 1 that voted for Trump because she knew HRC was a POS. I brought up Fauchi, the creation of the virus, the danger of the jabs, the sexualization of our children from the trannies, the southern border, etc and she had not heard anything on what I brought into the conversation. It was the same with the other 2 liberals that I spoke with, and one said she would need to see it on the news to believe it! The one that voted for Trump in 2016 voted for Biden in 2020. She said she didn't like the way he treated people. I was a little irritated at this point and said ya know the Presidency isn't and shouldn't be a popularity contest and I didn't always like his interactions with people but he didn't do anything to harm the US and her response was "Yeah but he would have in 2020 if congress hadn't stopped him". She said he downplayed the severity of the virus and could have gotten people killed." I then informed her that ivermectin, Vit.D & C, and hydroxychloroquine actually did effectively treat the virus, but your idiot socialist leaders censored and suppressed the science and medical fields from telling the truth about the virus and the jab. That was when she injected the "I'll have to see it to believe it". I said the truth is out there but you're not going to see it on abc, nbc, cbs or cnn but it is out there and one day you're going to apologize to me for blowing me off as a looney conspiracy theorist and that's okay Im patient....
When Fauchi and the nature of the virus came up she proceeds to tell me that China created it, and it really was at the wet market and that there really was bat dna found in the virus...lol I shook my head and said "none of that proves that the US didn't fund the creation of this scary virus. They've proved GOF which means it was bioterrorism that YOU paid for! Then it was released on the world killing people all over the globe until a vax was produced and forced on the citizens of this earth without any proof that it worked and in fact more people died in 2021 and 2022 than did in 2020. How do you explain that? Doesn't that make you a tiny bit suspicious that there may have been more to the entire debacle? Her response " well yeah but I haven't heard about any of that stuff"......I told her I'd send her some info. I'm going to send her some of Dr. Malones interviews but do any of you have suggestions as to what else I can send to pique her interest without overloading her initially? I'd like to ease her into it........

Wow! I have no suggestions really but I wouldn't overwhelm her initially. I went to a trucker protest last spring and a young lady launched at me every conspiracy subject under the sun connected to the last few years. In about three sentences. She was pretty thrilled I understood. I get the excitement but for a newbie some of it would be WAY out there and she hadn't even assessed my actual position in it. She kinda came across as a lunatic even though I agreed with her. Counter productive to talk about stuff such as adrenochrome right of the bat.

Not saying you'd do this RQ, of course not, but it's a concern when we need to talk to the public but... where to start? Can't figure it out myself.

I'm just amazed you even got anyone to listen this far into any of it, never mind this many subject areas. That's quite a talent. Would love to hear an update on how it goes.

I've never gotten past the vaccine argument where I was so, so wrong for shunning it. Then they quickly change the subject to something light and fluffy. Easy listening I suppose.

My dad did yell at me that he "had it on a higher authority" that I was to get the shots. What higher authority? Turned out to be CNN.

Soros = Nazis = Ukraine = Deep State = DNC = Hunter Biden

a reply to: Guyfriday
Well that is true! How can she be that stupid???? Glad she is gone.........

a reply to: igloo
Yes I agree. I feel like we need to start out with the Fauchi lies and his history of lying and self-dealing. The jab side effects that I have decided that when I talk about the jab, to someone who has taken it, I would make sure to work into the conversation that I believe there were placebo's which would explain why we, at this point, have not experienced the side effects. I am not sure if the one I spoke to tonight got the vaccine or not. She had the covid in the summer of 21 and had immunity so if she did take it, it would have been in the spring or summer of 22 but I do know the other two that I have talked with did get the jab. I see no reason to scare them it will probably put them on the defensive, I believe and will shut out any truth that I try to bring into the conversation. Right now I feel like she would be open to the things that I can back up with sources. She doesn't like or trust politicians so that's a plus....lol.

Your dad sounds like mine! He was so not happy with me when I registered as a Republican. The girl you spoke to may actually be a looney tune, but I have to say, I felt like I was coming off as one when I was trying to clue people in at first.


If you think of anything that might be helpful, please let me know even if it's just a different perspective that I should consider.

I am about to PM you with a few more details.

originally posted by: RookQueen

When Fauchi and the nature of the virus came up she proceeds to tell me that China created it, and it really was at the wet market and that there really was bat dna found in the virus...lol I shook my head and said "none of that proves that the US didn't fund the creation of this scary virus. They've proved GOF which means it was bioterrorism that YOU paid for!

I think you went maybe a bridge too far with this, I could see why she might have shut you down. Let me explain what I mean.

Proving that there was gain of function research doesn't prove that the "Covid" virus came from the Wuhan lab. Maybe it did, I'm not saying it didn't. It seems like a much more likely scenario for this virus to have escaped from a lab than to have evolved out of a wet market in my opinion. I'm saying we don't know for sure.

At the very least, I'd say the revelations we've seen in congressional hearings should have us questioning the wisdom of putting a bioweapons expert of questionable character and honesty in front of the public as the foremost authority on the subject, and the person to listen to. People really never should have given that guy as much credit as he received in the first place. I haven't even typed out his name yet, but you all know who I mean.

Anyhow, there are lots of rumors and speculation about this Covid thing flying around and I think it's easy to get caught up in speculation. There's no need for that though, the naked truth is horrible enough, without adding in any likely speculations. That speculation may be true or sound plausible, but if you state it as fact you're probably going to lose your listener. Focus on the known facts.

The fact that the PCR test was never a reliable diagnosis tool. It's a fairly technical topic, but if you can wrap your mind around it and communicate the weaknesses of that test to others, it really blows a huge hole in the narrative. Especially the way that they pimped this test so hard at the outset, over other tried and true methods of diagnosis such as an antibody test. Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on the technical details. I can.

The fact that this virus was known to be very widely transmitted very early, and therefore not really very deadly. See the UC Santa Clara study that was published in April of 2020. It received instant ridicule, dismissal, and was debunked as vigorously as I've ever seen a news story debunked. Hell, I might not have paid much attention to it if not for all of the "whatever you do don't look over there!!!" type media coverage I saw of it when I looked it up.

Early peer review of some very large data sets confirmed the findings, and then the story got stepped on, hard. All of the lockdowns and mask rules were not only ineffective but completely unnecessary. This thing was widespread by mid 2020. Of course, lockdowns and masking did help bump up the numbers on respiratory illness I'm sure.

The fact that the vaccine has been promoted from the outset of this scenario, and was never adequately tested. We were told we needed a vaccine before we even knew what we were dealing with. These experimental injections could be completely harmless, or could cause 100% sterility in a few years, or even be 100% fatal over time. The fact is, we simply don't know, because they haven't been adequately tested.

The fact that large pharmaceutical corporations are only too happy to guinea pig the public for profit, and that federal regulators, legislators, and executives are either asleep at the switch or complicit is horrible enough without any speculation into what else might be going on there.

These are all known facts, clear on their face for anyone who can understand them.

As for the rest of your recounted conversation, let me see...

The tranny thing is being counter-spun as oh you're a bigot if you're concerned about it, poor ol' trans-peoples are just trying to be themselves, so I think that's a topic that you have to navigate tactfully, if the gal is thoroughly indoctrinated. On the one hand, drag queen story hour stuff is defensible, as it is an English tradition. Without any abuse or sexualization of the encounter, it can be innocent enough, though weird as all get out, I agree.

When you get to striptease type performances aimed at children, and burlesque type shows at school assemblies, then you've really left the realm of activities of that sort that can be defended. It's not socially acceptable (or even legal!) for adult women to engage in such activities with children, so why would it be okay for cross-dressing adult men to? I'd suggest that you focus on the more extreme examples if you want to change her mind. Otherwise you'll probably just alienate her.

Don't get me wrong, I think cross dressing and transsexualism is weird stuff, and as a heterosexual male who is comfortable with his sexuality, not afraid of gay people at all, in fact I have a number of gay friends who I love as people and am very close with though not in a sexual way, it still makes me uncomfortable. You throw in messing with kids' minds, trying to mess with their sexual development in that way, that is just wrong. Those trans people need to find better ways to deal with their stuff, and there's nothing bigoted about that viewpoint.

Like cranky says though, many are thoroughly indoctrinated to consider these trans people the victims, and aren't seeing any of the other side of the story. I'm sure plenty of them are victimized. They're pretty weird by way of comparison to social norms, and people that stick out that much are often victimized.

Also the thing where you said 'your idiot socialist electees'...not that I disagree, but if you are not tactful enough with your friend in how you state your arguments, she's probably not going to respect your views.

Whoo! Went pretty long with this one. Sorry! hope this helps. I've got some links on the covid stuff if you'd like to see them.

originally posted by: RookQueen

I honestly do not know how to reach the dem voters with this information until someone finds a way to get this into the MSM.
I have talked with 3 democrats this week, 1 that voted for Trump because she knew HRC was a POS. I brought up Fauchi, the creation of the virus, the danger of the jabs, the sexualization of our children from the trannies, the southern border, etc and she had not heard anything on what I brought into the conversation. It was the same with the other 2 liberals that I spoke with, and one said she would need to see it on the news to believe it! The one that voted for Trump in 2016 voted for Biden in 2020. She said she didn't like the way he treated people. I was a little irritated at this point and said ya know the Presidency isn't and shouldn't be a popularity contest and I didn't always like his interactions with people but he didn't do anything to harm the US and her response was "Yeah but he would have in 2020 if congress hadn't stopped him". She said he downplayed the severity of the virus and could have gotten people killed." I then informed her that ivermectin, Vit.D & C, and hydroxychloroquine actually did effectively treat the virus, but your idiot socialist leaders censored and suppressed the science and medical fields from telling the truth about the virus and the jab. That was when she injected the "I'll have to see it to believe it". I said the truth is out there but you're not going to see it on abc, nbc, cbs or cnn but it is out there and one day you're going to apologize to me for blowing me off as a looney conspiracy theorist and that's okay Im patient....
When Fauchi and the nature of the virus came up she proceeds to tell me that China created it, and it really was at the wet market and that there really was bat dna found in the virus...lol I shook my head and said "none of that proves that the US didn't fund the creation of this scary virus. They've proved GOF which means it was bioterrorism that YOU paid for! Then it was released on the world killing people all over the globe until a vax was produced and forced on the citizens of this earth without any proof that it worked and in fact more people died in 2021 and 2022 than did in 2020. How do you explain that? Doesn't that make you a tiny bit suspicious that there may have been more to the entire debacle? Her response " well yeah but I haven't heard about any of that stuff"......I told her I'd send her some info. I'm going to send her some of Dr. Malones interviews but do any of you have suggestions as to what else I can send to pique her interest without overloading her initially? I'd like to ease her into it........

Maybe try this posted on the NIH website?
Covid-19 Pandemic: What is the truth?

I know I don't post a lot, but I follow the thread every day. God Bless everyone on here! Thank you for all of your hard work!

Back to lurking.....

a reply to: PeteMitchell
One thing hearing numbers , another seeing IT
1 dot = 100k
No volume needed - you'll only be hearing WTF in your head anyway...

ITs a small World after all

Good Morning All…🥰

So this whole Trump tax release debacle is perplexing ? What possible benefit can this precedent being set do to help Dems moving forward ? Neither Trump or his children took a salary while he was POTUS and my understanding was that he was no longer running his businesses while POTUS, so what do they think we’re going see, he lost money ?

How can Dems claim all Presidents are audited by the IRS, but now somehow he lied about being audited ? Are they claiming the same IRS that was caught targeting conservatives also didn’t audit him properly since they didn’t find anything wrong ?

The claim that Brandon complied by showing his PERSONAL tax returns, doesn’t really include any funds he received clandestinely and as far as we know Brandon doesn’t legally run any businesses or employ anyone ! IDK, is this just another chess move to force Dems to now have their finances scrutinized ? 🤔

a reply to: MountainLaurel
Old meme

The Revolving Door - Pennsylvania
Think Tank lol
~

Excellent report I am reading here. Exactly how to handle it if someone had a manual. The truth IS out there if they wish to seek it. They do know they were lied to and will eventually come around to all of what you said to them was absolutely true and fair to all the circumstances.

I say to my friends

"Hear me now, and if you don't believe it today, you sure will one day. That is all there is left to say about it."

originally posted by: RookQueen

I honestly do not know how to reach the dem voters with this information until someone finds a way to get this into the MSM.
I have talked with 3 democrats this week, 1 that voted for Trump because she knew HRC was a POS. I brought up Fauchi, the creation of the virus, the danger of the jabs, the sexualization of our children from the trannies, the southern border, etc and she had not heard anything on what I brought into the conversation. It was the same with the other 2 liberals that I spoke with, and one said she would need to see it on the news to believe it! The one that voted for Trump in 2016 voted for Biden in 2020. She said she didn't like the way he treated people. I was a little irritated at this point and said ya know the Presidency isn't and shouldn't be a popularity contest and I didn't always like his interactions with people but he didn't do anything to harm the US and her response was "Yeah but he would have in 2020 if congress hadn't stopped him". She said he downplayed the severity of the virus and could have gotten people killed." I then informed her that ivermectin, Vit.D & C, and hydroxychloroquine actually did effectively treat the virus, but your idiot socialist leaders censored and suppressed the science and medical fields from telling the truth about the virus and the jab. That was when she injected the "I'll have to see it to believe it". I said the truth is out there but you're not going to see it on abc, nbc, cbs or cnn but it is out there and one day you're going to apologize to me for blowing me off as a looney conspiracy theorist and that's okay Im patient....
When Fauchi and the nature of the virus came up she proceeds to tell me that China created it, and it really was at the wet market and that there really was bat dna found in the virus...lol I shook my head and said "none of that proves that the US didn't fund the creation of this scary virus. They've proved GOF which means it was bioterrorism that YOU paid for! Then it was released on the world killing people all over the globe until a vax was produced and forced on the citizens of this earth without any proof that it worked and in fact more people died in 2021 and 2022 than did in 2020. How do you explain that? Doesn't that make you a tiny bit suspicious that there may have been more to the entire debacle? Her response " well yeah but I haven't heard about any of that stuff"......I told her I'd send her some info. I'm going to send her some of Dr. Malones interviews but do any of you have suggestions as to what else I can send to pique her interest without overloading her initially? I'd like to ease her into it........

An 'Imperial Supreme Court' Asserts Its Power, Alarming Scholars

This is a very good read....it explains how SCOTUS has been taking back power from everyone.....

news.yahoo.com...

“The court has not been favoring one branch of government over another, or favoring states over the federal government, or the rights of people over governments,” Lemley wrote. “Rather, it is withdrawing power from all of them at once.”

“The Roberts court, more than any other court in history, uses its docket-setting discretion to select cases that allow it to revisit and overrule precedent,” Narechania found in the study, which will be published in the St. Louis University Law Journal and built on an earlier one in the Columbia Law Review.

“You don’t want the political branches telling you what the law is,” he said, echoing Chief Justice John Marshall’s famous statement in Marbury v. Madison, the foundational 1803 decision: “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial branch to say what the law is.”

The statement is popular with the current court. “Over half of the total number of majority or concurring opinions in Supreme Court history to have quoted this language from Marbury,” Brown and Epstein wrote, “have been penned by the Roberts court.”


NOW....think about the Brunson case.......Let that sink in...........................................

Dot.Dot.Dot.Dot Connect the dots!!

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Soros = Nazis = Ukraine = Deep State = DNC = Hunter Biden

originally posted by: MountainLaurel
Good Morning All…🥰

So this whole Trump tax release debacle is perplexing ? What possible benefit can this precedent being set do to help Dems moving forward ? Neither Trump or his children took a salary while he was POTUS and my understanding was that he was no longer running his businesses while POTUS, so what do they think we’re going see, he lost money ?

How can Dems claim all Presidents are audited by the IRS, but now somehow he lied about being audited ? Are they claiming the same IRS that was caught targeting conservatives also didn’t audit him properly since they didn’t find anything wrong ?

The claim that Brandon complied by showing his PERSONAL tax returns, doesn’t really include any funds he received clandestinely and as far as we know Brandon doesn’t legally run any businesses or employ anyone ! IDK, is this just another chess move to force Dems to now have their finances scrutinized ? 🤔

They are throwing up a cloud so they can use some dumbass excuse to slow down his being able to be POTUS. We all know if he was doing the IRS dirty he would've been crucified mercilessly years ago.