It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: quintessentone
Again, I find myself in partial agreement with you.
their careers matter more to them than anything else.
This includes the Hippocratic Oath.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: quintessentone
You speak for most of the world?
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: quintessentone
Actually it’s a compliment, Annee is a proud member of the libtard woke crew. She supports Antifa, Ukraine, Covid Mandates, Trans Agenda, Equality of Outcome and ……… I was going to say BLM and CRT but that’s a conflict of interest too far.
Wonder what the next social justice crusade this “independent thinker” will jump on.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: quintessentone
Actually it’s a compliment, Annee is a proud member of the libtard woke crew. She supports Antifa, Ukraine, Covid Mandates, Trans Agenda, Equality of Outcome and ……… I was going to say BLM and CRT but that’s a conflict of interest too far.
Wonder what the next social justice crusade this “independent thinker” will jump on.
I prefer to hear from Annee herself, not your perverted version of her.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: quintessentone
No, they speak to the people pliable and indoctrinated enough to believe them.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: quintessentone
Actually it’s a compliment, Annee is a proud member of the libtard woke crew. She supports Antifa, Ukraine, Covid Mandates, Trans Agenda, Equality of Outcome and ……… I was going to say BLM and CRT but that’s a conflict of interest too far.
Wonder what the next social justice crusade this “independent thinker” will jump on.
I prefer to hear from Annee herself, not your perverted version of her.
Always love it when an opposition tells me who I am.
As already outlined, those who are more likely to seek an abortion are more likely to be socially disadvantaged, and therefore less able to access abortion with the new laws. There is therefore potential for great harms to be caused in terms of limiting their access to broader opportunities, further widening health and social inequalities, and exacerbating deprivation. It is morally unjust for there to be such wide disparity in access to abortion services in different states, because doing so not only violates the principles of justice and fair access, but also contributes to wider social inequality and limitation of opportunity.
Irrespective of one’s own viewpoint on the moral acceptability of abortion, it is undeniable that the new laws have significant implications in terms of equity of access, and threatens the moral principle of justice - a principle which is integral to a functioning society. The new law will continue to exacerbate health inequalities and harm those who are already some of the most vulnerable in society, and it is this which should be keeping us awake at night.
And with pro-lifers and religion-guided politics the abortions will not be reduced until services and programs are provided to assist some women who would otherwise not abort if given childcare and a way to succeed and be a mother. What about child poverty?
A faulty generalization is an informal fallacy wherein a conclusion is drawn about all or many instances of a phenomenon on the basis of one or a few instances of that phenomenon.
Who are you, and the rest of the Pro-Death Squad, to say who lives and who dies.
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Quadrivium
Who are you, and the rest of the Pro-Death Squad, to say who lives and who dies.
Yet pro-lifers get to force a woman to carry to term no matter the harm it does to her health? Only pro-lifers get to decide who lives and who dies (perhaps the woman or both)?
Did you see on the news, a young couple got joyously pregnant, but complications arose where the amniotic fluid was totally lost and the fetus could not survive, but the medical people said no abortion, let's wait, while she developed sepsis and nearly died. Long story short, they finally aborted the fetus because they had no choice but to save her life and now she is unable to get pregnant. She and her husband call that NOT pro-life.
More horror stories will follow.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: quintessentone
I’m agnostic.
Agnostic is a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: quintessentone
Silly me, I should be a rigid believer in doctrine and claim to know for certain the nature of creation.
originally posted by: Thrumbo
Most abortions are minorities and most minorities vote Democrat.
By stopping abortions, the right is starting to nail their own coffin down the road by forcing the growth of the opposition's voter base.
They don't seem to understand that.
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Quadrivium
The women that will be directly affected are minority disadvantaged women, so will this drive some of them to get abortions in a dangerous way?