Abortions - Why so bad?

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: Annee

However, at this point men are not needed. Frozen sperm, which can be scientifically checked for genetic defaults -- is healthier than the usual delivery.

So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?
Don't worry. Help is on the way!

Hopefully, Science will also help us to understand why some people, like psychopaths, are not able to act morally, and discover ways to help them.

kids.frontiersin.org...

Your words, not mine: "So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?"

I'm not interested in what was or any life fantasy.

Morals? Who's morals? Are you the moral chooser?

ALL LIVING CHILDREN - FED, CLOTHED, HOUSED, EDUCATED, LOVED, AND MORE - - - that's my moral compass.

They are living.
They are human beings.
The ONLY difference between you and them is "Location, location, location", you are at different locations of your life cycle.
That is all.

NO - zygote/embryo/fetus -- is not a LIVING CHILD

a reply to: Annee

Why are abortions good? Because I have the right to choose.

You had the right to choose before getting pregnant.
It is not the right to "choose" you want.
It is the right to another human beings life you want.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: Annee

However, at this point men are not needed. Frozen sperm, which can be scientifically checked for genetic defaults -- is healthier than the usual delivery.

So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?
Don't worry. Help is on the way!

Hopefully, Science will also help us to understand why some people, like psychopaths, are not able to act morally, and discover ways to help them.

kids.frontiersin.org...

Your words, not mine: "So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?"

I'm not interested in what was or any life fantasy.

Morals? Who's morals? Are you the moral chooser?

ALL LIVING CHILDREN - FED, CLOTHED, HOUSED, EDUCATED, LOVED, AND MORE - - - that's my moral compass.

They are living.
They are human beings.
The ONLY difference between you and them is "Location, location, location", you are at different locations of your life cycle.
That is all.

NO - zygote/embryo/fetus -- is not a LIVING CHILD

It absolutely is a living human being just like a "living child". They are the same, just different locations in their life cycles.

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: Annee

However, at this point men are not needed. Frozen sperm, which can be scientifically checked for genetic defaults -- is healthier than the usual delivery.

So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?
Don't worry. Help is on the way!

Hopefully, Science will also help us to understand why some people, like psychopaths, are not able to act morally, and discover ways to help them.

kids.frontiersin.org...

Your words, not mine: "So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?"

I'm not interested in what was or any life fantasy.

Morals? Who's morals? Are you the moral chooser?

ALL LIVING CHILDREN - FED, CLOTHED, HOUSED, EDUCATED, LOVED, AND MORE - - - that's my moral compass.

They are living.
They are human beings.
The ONLY difference between you and them is "Location, location, location", you are at different locations of your life cycle.
That is all.

NO - zygote/embryo/fetus -- is not a LIVING CHILD

It absolutely is a living human being just like a "living child". They are the same, just different locations in their life cycles.

NO - it is not a LIVING CHILD.

A LIVING CHILD is not a zygote/embryo/fetus.

Can I give it a baby bottle to drink? NO, I can't.

Feel free to stay on your side of your moral fence -- and out of my yard of choice.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: Annee

However, at this point men are not needed. Frozen sperm, which can be scientifically checked for genetic defaults -- is healthier than the usual delivery.

So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?
Don't worry. Help is on the way!

Hopefully, Science will also help us to understand why some people, like psychopaths, are not able to act morally, and discover ways to help them.

kids.frontiersin.org...

Your words, not mine: "So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?"

I'm not interested in what was or any life fantasy.

Morals? Who's morals? Are you the moral chooser?

ALL LIVING CHILDREN - FED, CLOTHED, HOUSED, EDUCATED, LOVED, AND MORE - - - that's my moral compass.

They are living.
They are human beings.
The ONLY difference between you and them is "Location, location, location", you are at different locations of your life cycle.
That is all.

NO - zygote/embryo/fetus -- is not a LIVING CHILD

It absolutely is a living human being just like a "living child". They are the same, just different locations in their life cycles.

NO - it is not a LIVING CHILD.

A LIVING CHILD is not a zygote/embryo/fetus.

Can I give it a baby bottle to drink? NO, I can't.

Feel free to stay on your side of your moral fence -- and out of my yard of choice.

No matter your feelz, they ARE a living human being in the beginning of their life cycle.
So, in Your honest opinion, you truly believe that you are not and can not be a human being until you can suck on a bottle???

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: Annee

However, at this point men are not needed. Frozen sperm, which can be scientifically checked for genetic defaults -- is healthier than the usual delivery.

So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?
Don't worry. Help is on the way!

Hopefully, Science will also help us to understand why some people, like psychopaths, are not able to act morally, and discover ways to help them.

kids.frontiersin.org...

Your words, not mine: "So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?"

I'm not interested in what was or any life fantasy.

Morals? Who's morals? Are you the moral chooser?

ALL LIVING CHILDREN - FED, CLOTHED, HOUSED, EDUCATED, LOVED, AND MORE - - - that's my moral compass.

They are living.
They are human beings.
The ONLY difference between you and them is "Location, location, location", you are at different locations of your life cycle.
That is all.

NO - zygote/embryo/fetus -- is not a LIVING CHILD

It absolutely is a living human being just like a "living child". They are the same, just different locations in their life cycles.

NO - it is not a LIVING CHILD.

A LIVING CHILD is not a zygote/embryo/fetus.

Can I give it a baby bottle to drink? NO, I can't.

Feel free to stay on your side of your moral fence -- and out of my yard of choice.

can you make nuclear bomb?

run a 3 min mile?

perform an abortion?

Maybe it is time for someone to come up with a pill and a handshake…

originally posted by: sarahvital

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: Annee

However, at this point men are not needed. Frozen sperm, which can be scientifically checked for genetic defaults -- is healthier than the usual delivery.

So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?
Don't worry. Help is on the way!

Hopefully, Science will also help us to understand why some people, like psychopaths, are not able to act morally, and discover ways to help them.

kids.frontiersin.org...

Your words, not mine: "So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?"

I'm not interested in what was or any life fantasy.

Morals? Who's morals? Are you the moral chooser?

ALL LIVING CHILDREN - FED, CLOTHED, HOUSED, EDUCATED, LOVED, AND MORE - - - that's my moral compass.

They are living.
They are human beings.
The ONLY difference between you and them is "Location, location, location", you are at different locations of your life cycle.
That is all.

NO - zygote/embryo/fetus -- is not a LIVING CHILD

It absolutely is a living human being just like a "living child". They are the same, just different locations in their life cycles.

NO - it is not a LIVING CHILD.

A LIVING CHILD is not a zygote/embryo/fetus.

Can I give it a baby bottle to drink? NO, I can't.

Feel free to stay on your side of your moral fence -- and out of my yard of choice.

can you make nuclear bomb?

run a 3 min mile?

perform an abortion?

Wrong thread?

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: Annee

However, at this point men are not needed. Frozen sperm, which can be scientifically checked for genetic defaults -- is healthier than the usual delivery.

So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?
Don't worry. Help is on the way!

Hopefully, Science will also help us to understand why some people, like psychopaths, are not able to act morally, and discover ways to help them.

kids.frontiersin.org...

Your words, not mine: "So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?"

I'm not interested in what was or any life fantasy.

Morals? Who's morals? Are you the moral chooser?

ALL LIVING CHILDREN - FED, CLOTHED, HOUSED, EDUCATED, LOVED, AND MORE - - - that's my moral compass.

They are living.
They are human beings.
The ONLY difference between you and them is "Location, location, location", you are at different locations of your life cycle.
That is all.

NO - zygote/embryo/fetus -- is not a LIVING CHILD

It absolutely is a living human being just like a "living child". They are the same, just different locations in their life cycles.

NO - it is not a LIVING CHILD.

A LIVING CHILD is not a zygote/embryo/fetus.

Can I give it a baby bottle to drink? NO, I can't.

Feel free to stay on your side of your moral fence -- and out of my yard of choice.

No matter your feelz, they ARE a living human being in the beginning of their life cycle.
So, in Your honest opinion, you truly believe that you are not and can not be a human being until you can suck on a bottle???

No matter your feelz -- please stay on your side of your self-righteous, chosen by you, moral fence.

I will continue to stand with the immediate needs of LIVING CHILDREN that need food, love, care, shelter, education, health care, etc.

originally posted by: Annee

I will continue to stand with the immediate needs of LIVING CHILDREN that need food, love, care, shelter, education, health care, etc.

Most food and shelter charities are Christian, so the belief that life is sacred is still reinforced by their willingness to support people in need.

We should all be sure to thank our mom for not destroying our developing embryo before it came to fruition. Many kids in this coming era will thank the reversal of Roe v. Wade for them not being aborted.

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: Annee

I will continue to stand with the immediate needs of LIVING CHILDREN that need food, love, care, shelter, education, health care, etc.

Most food and shelter charities are Christian, so the belief that life is sacred is still reinforced by their willingness to support people in need.

We should all be sure to thank our mom for not destroying our developing embryo before it came to fruition. Many kids in this coming era will thank the reversal of Roe v. Wade for them not being aborted.

I am atheist.

Do you remember your life before you were born? Yeah, nothing. Same as if you'd never been born.

Dumbest argument ever -- "if your mom aborted you".

What are some atheist's charity organizations?
Here is an abridged list:

American Red Cross
American Lung Associaton
American Humanists
Amnesty International
Doctors Without Borders
Feeding America
FINCA
Humane Society
International Committee of the Red Cross
Lions Club
Meals on Wheels (some local affiliates may be run by churches)
Orbis
Oxfam
Peace Corps
Planned Parenthood
Rotary International
UNICEF

www.quora.com...

a reply to: Annee

Approximately 30 hours after fertilization, a zygote produces two cells.

Which is more complex than the most basic definition of life, a single celled bacteria.

By all scientific reasoning, life starts at conception.

originally posted by: rounda
a reply to: Annee

Approximately 30 hours after fertilization, a zygote produces two cells.

Which is more complex than the most basic definition of life, a single celled bacteria.

By all scientific reasoning, life starts at conception.

Good for you. Can't drink from a bottle.

LIVING CHILDREN need food, love, care, shelter, education, medical, and a lot more.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: rounda
a reply to: Annee

Approximately 30 hours after fertilization, a zygote produces two cells.

Which is more complex than the most basic definition of life, a single celled bacteria.

By all scientific reasoning, life starts at conception.

Good for you. Can't drink from a bottle.

LIVING CHILDREN need food, love, care, shelter, education, medical, and a lot more.

What does a bottle have to do with life?

That's a downright ridiculous argument. By that logic, premature babies who need to be fed through feeding tube or IV aren't living babies.

Here's the classic appeal to authority:

papers.ssrn.com...

A sample of 5,502 biologists from 1,058 academic institutions assessed statements representing the biological view ‘a human’s life begins at fertilization’...
Overall, 95% of all biologists affirmed the biological view that a human's life begins at fertilization (5212 out of 5502).

Logical fallacy good enough for global warming, not good enough for human life?

a reply to: rounda

By all scientific reasoning, life starts at conception.

Nope. What were sperm and ova, dead?

By all scientific reasoning, life is a circle, with no beginning or end. Like a snake eating its own tail, life devours life.

originally posted by: Annee

Do you remember your life before you were born? Yeah, nothing. Same as if you'd never been born.

So since babies don't remember life when they were 6 months old.. should we be able to kill them at that age?

Face it, when the sperm meets the egg, the zygote contains all the genetic information that will also be present in your cells the rest of your life.

I am extremely happy I was not aborted. and so are most other people who are alive.

I cannot for the life of me see how it is any ones business including the various Gods that people prostrate to, what a woman, man and or a Dr decide to do about an unborn fetus. It astounds me when especially men get involved in this argument.

In Australia and New Zealand it is legal to have an abortion which is fantastic. I guess in the USA other than your primary industry the military you also have a prison system to feed, so you need to make everything you can illegal, got to keep the crime industry full with clients. Aborting a fetus in the right fashion is possibly better than more unwanted children running around. O my we have created such a clown world.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: Annee

However, at this point men are not needed. Frozen sperm, which can be scientifically checked for genetic defaults -- is healthier than the usual delivery.

So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?
Don't worry. Help is on the way!

Hopefully, Science will also help us to understand why some people, like psychopaths, are not able to act morally, and discover ways to help them.

kids.frontiersin.org...

Your words, not mine: "So, it's OK to kill men now, as they're "not needed"?"

I'm not interested in what was or any life fantasy.

Morals? Who's morals? Are you the moral chooser?

ALL LIVING CHILDREN - FED, CLOTHED, HOUSED, EDUCATED, LOVED, AND MORE - - - that's my moral compass.

They are living.
They are human beings.
The ONLY difference between you and them is "Location, location, location", you are at different locations of your life cycle.
That is all.

NO - zygote/embryo/fetus -- is not a LIVING CHILD

It absolutely is a living human being just like a "living child". They are the same, just different locations in their life cycles.

NO - it is not a LIVING CHILD.

A LIVING CHILD is not a zygote/embryo/fetus.

Can I give it a baby bottle to drink? NO, I can't.

Feel free to stay on your side of your moral fence -- and out of my yard of choice.

No matter your feelz, they ARE a living human being in the beginning of their life cycle.
So, in Your honest opinion, you truly believe that you are not and can not be a human being until you can suck on a bottle???

No matter your feelz -- please stay on your side of your self-righteous, chosen by you, moral fence.

I will continue to stand with the immediate needs of LIVING CHILDREN that need food, love, care, shelter, education, health care, etc.

They are individual living human beings.
Abortion, in 99% of cases, is the premeditated killing of another human being for convenience.

originally posted by: marsend
I cannot for the life of me see how it is any ones business including the various Gods that people prostrate to, what a woman, man and or a Dr decide to do about an unborn fetus. It astounds me when especially men get involved in this argument.

In Australia and New Zealand it is legal to have an abortion which is fantastic. I guess in the USA other than your primary industry the military you also have a prison system to feed, so you need to make everything you can illegal, got to keep the crime industry full with clients. Aborting a fetus in the right fashion is possibly better than more unwanted children running around. O my we have created such a clown world.

Would you kill a toddler?
How about a teen?
An adult or senior?
If not, why?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: rounda

By all scientific reasoning, life starts at conception.

Nope. What were sperm and ova, dead?

By all scientific reasoning, life is a circle, with no beginning or end. Like a snake eating its own tail, life devours life.

An individual human beings life begins at conception.
No longer live sperm from the father.
No longer live ova from the mother.
A unique individual human being.