UK Gov Data - 1 In Every 246 Vaccinated People Has Died Within 60 Days Of Covid-19 Vaccination

originally posted by: Randyvine2
So you're argument is that career professionals, respected academics faithful
in their fields of medicine.

My argument is that most so-called "professionals" are not what they pretend to be. Over the last two years, a bunch of them have tirelessly propagated antiscience to prove one point, or another. Mainly that vaccines don't work, are dangerous or some other drivel.

Additionally, ignorant and politically / religiously motivated people use vaccines as a pretext for their own set of conspiracies, up to and including killing people in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The OP does not seem to have an author, so who knows what qualifications the author had. Not maths, that's clear. The website upon which the OP's article was written has some real anti-vax talent.

a reply to: Randyvine2

The article was written by Mercola, a person with a disreputable reputation who sells fake covid cures, so the article is to promote his own agenda...

Then this from your own link

There is no scientific data to prove that COVID-19 vaccines are lethal. However, the vaccines may cause side effects which are listed by WHO.

a reply to: paraphi

Fair enough then. I really want to get to the bottom of all this.
I can tell ya that. What a f#@$ed up world! I would love to have
something solid to give me hope for my grand kids. And if there's
no hope I need yo know that to as soon as possible.

That's only part of my dilemma. Tired of this GD computer

a reply to: Kurokage

Ya of course. They're refuting everything to your convenience.
Why is that? Not suspicious at all that google hides and refutes
his article and PROFFESSIONAL analysis.

I find all the search engines committing such a foul highly
compelling.



See my signature

a reply to: Randyvine2

Their refuting everything to your convenience.

It's not to my convenience.
The article was written by a crook and a sharlatan.

Why is that? Not suspicious at all that google hides and refutes
his article and PROFFESSIONAL analysis.

It's not suspicious at all and is not being hiden?? It's because crooks and charlatans claim to be professional when they're not and post ill informed or even false data to make money from gullible people which is dangerous.

a reply to: Kurokage

Watch the video

All you're giving is your opinion

a reply to: Randyvine2

You're telling me to watch a video but ignore the fact that your source is a charlatan and crook??

a reply to: Randyvine2

Have you ever wondered why the man in the video chooses Germany as an example, or why he chooses people under 65?

It's might be for two reasons. firstly, Germany had an outbreak of a Coronavirus early in 2019 that was similar in structure to Covid, which meant that there was already a certain amount of natural immunity in Germany. The virus was close enough to covid it reduced the number of early deaths that Germany had when covid hit. Plus, under 65s have a much lower risk of dying from covid, period.

So, early in the pandemic Germany had an unusually low number of deaths among under 65s.

a reply to: Kurokage

No I'm telling you your opinion is irrelevant.

You can listen to a virologist or keep offering your
opinion of who wrote the article. I don't care which one you do.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Because he lives in Germany

originally posted by: Randyvine2
a reply to: Kurokage

No I'm telling you your opinion is irrelevant.

You can listen to a virologist or keep offering your
opinion of who wrote the article. I don't care which one you do.

And thats why you're believeing these crooks, it's not MY opinion! it's the facts and you choose to ignore them.

a reply to: Kurokage

Why are you ignoring the virologist speaking honestly to
anyone who will listen. Deny ignorance or the truth .

He's not a crook. He's a world class virologist and you're ignoring him.

Why?

a reply to: Randyvine2

He's not world class at all, he's an antisemite nut case. He may have been 20 years ago but he hasn't been for a while, he's another who likes to mix a small dose of facts with speculation and disinformation for their own reasons.
Everyone you've linked to so far has an anti-science agenda, just like the OPs links.

a reply to: Kurokage

You haven't even listened to him. He explains exactly what is
happening and making perfect sense. And you're triggered.

You're serving a total detriment to your own argument.

Listen and tell me where he's wrong. How bout that?

Here's another opinion from the comment section

I have been an infectious disease clinical Pharmacist since 1980. Dr Bnakdi has my respect.

See these are opinions

This man makes the most sense of anyone I have heard and I am a nurse. He is clear and concise.

Just like yours.

originally posted by: Randyvine2
a reply to: Kurokage

You haven't even listened to him. He explains exactly what is
happening and making perfect sense. And you're triggered.

You're serving a total detriment to your own argument.

If you want to believe every nut that crawls out the wood work to back up your own misunderstanding, go ahead.
It's just the typical responce from a misinformed sheep "Oh, your triggered" because someone can drive a truck through the holes of the theories you're blindly following.

a reply to: Kurokage

No I think you're proving who the nut job is right here and now.
Damn sure ain't listening to you.

Everyone that doesn't agree with you is nuts.

It's just the typical responce from a misinformed sheep "Oh, your triggered" because someone can drive a truck through the holes of the theories you're blindly following.

Well I just happen to drive truck so show me where the holes are.

a reply to: Randyvine2

Youv'e shown you can't fact check anything and blindly follow whats posted to sites that match your beliefs and you want to call me a nut job??
Every link you've posted is to people with alterior motive or agendas, a book or "cure" to sell and you want to believe them??
The Journal

a reply to: Kurokage

I'm asking you to refute him for me.

And you won't even listen to him.

That's a little off yes I'm sorry

From the journal

However, studies have shown the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus can impact other organs and parts of the body.

You mean like the heart?

a reply to: Randyvine2

Who said I didn't listen to him, I said...

You're telling me to watch a video but ignore the fact that your source is a charlatan and crook??

I posted that "Dr" Mercola wasn't who he was claiming to be, he wrote the article you linked to and he's a denyer so he can sell his "cures", and Dr Bhakdi who's a retired microbiologist didn't even seem to know the basics of virology.

a reply to: Kurokage

I posted that "Dr" Mercola wasn't who he was claiming to be, he wrote the article you linked to and he's a denyer so he can sell his "cures", and Dr Bhakdi who's a retired microbiologist did'nt even seem to know the basics of virology

How do you know? what are the basics?

I wonder if his students know how f@#$ed up he is?

How does a professor get by not knowing the basics?

Is that the new standard for college these days?

He was a professor at the University of Mainz, where from 1991 to 2012 he was head of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene.[4] The university has disassociated itself from Bhakdi's views on the Coronavirus pandemic.[5] In 2021 Bhakdi's publisher broke off relations following the appearance of an online video in which Bhakdi made antisemitic comments.[6]

source

Cheez and rice why would I listen to him and not you?