UK Gov Data - 1 In Every 246 Vaccinated People Has Died Within 60 Days Of Covid-19 Vaccination

The numbers speak for themselves, and although the government makes it difficult to calculate, the author managed to use excel to tease out the data. After denying that they did not hold the information, the ONS quietly published the data about vaccine deaths right as Boris Johnson announced his resignation. I don't claim to be a math whiz, but is 1 death out of every 246 people within a 60 day period normal?

According to the UKHA, 44.48 million people have had a single dose, 41.8 million people have had two doses, and 32.9 million people have had three doses as of July 3rd 2022.

Therefore, using simple maths, we find that 1 in every 246 vaccinated people has died within 60 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England.

44,480,115 (People vaccinated) / 180,659 (deaths) = 246 = 1 death for every 246 people vaccinated

SOURCE

UK Government Source

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

but is 1 death out of every 246 people within a 60 day period normal?

Yep, that's totally Nornal McNormalface. Any claim to the contrary is easily explained as 180,659 coincidences. admittedly it's probably not that entire number, but who's counting, right?

Best friend and mentor- 3 weeks-dead
Father in law- 3 day- dead

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

but is 1 death out of every 246 people within a 60 day period normal?

Yep, that's totally Nornal McNormalface. Any claim to the contrary is easily explained as 180,659 coincidences. admittedly it's probably not that entire number, but who's counting, right?

From the Spreadsheet under 'Definitions' tab:

Definitions of COVID-19 deaths used in this dataset and accompanying publication:

We use the term “involving COVID-19” when referring only to deaths where COVID-19 is mentioned anywhere on the death certificate. Information on cause of death coding is available in the User Guide to Mortality Statistics.
For this analysis we define a death as involving COVID-19 if either of the ICD10 codes U07.1 (COVID-19, virus identified) or U07.2 (COVID-19, virus not identified) is mentioned on the death certificate. In contrast to the definition used in the weekly deaths released, deaths where the ICD10 code U09.9 (Post-COVID condition, where the acute COVID had ended before the condition immediately causing death occurred) is mentioned on the death certificate and neither of the other two COVID-19 codes are mentioned are not included, as they are likely to be the result of an infection caught a long time previously, and therefore not linked to the vaccination status of the person at date of death. Deaths involving U10.9 (Multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19) where neither U07.1 nor U07.2 are mentioned are also excluded.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The anecdotal evidence was pointing to one in 200 adverse reactions after the jab, I didn't think that meant death. For every death, there would be multiple injuries. We are seeing mandated Air NZ cutting a lot of flights because of staff sickness. Well, they certainly have done a job on us.
I actually think the medical profession here knows what's going on.They don't seem to be pushing the poison anymore.

a reply to: visitedbythem

In the immediate family, one bowel cancer one lung cancer one heart attack and now one with kidneys packed up has to go on dialysis but the shunt is infected and won't heal up, they say his immune system should have handled it.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Assuming there are typically 650,000 deaths a year in UK, that would be 650,000/12 = 54,000 per month. This chart shows a 17 month period. You would expect 918,000 deaths in this time. Of those, 166,000 died within 2 months after a shot.

I am not sure this is a convincing argument. I might just not understand the numbers.

I do believe that UK stats are showing a significant increase in all cause mortality of 15-20%.

Boris Johnson and much of his helpers did decide to leave office for no reason and this new data that is coming out sure looks like it is the reason they are leaving. They believed a lie and decided that because they had they should not be in charge anymore...which sounds like a reasonable decision. I would resign if I pushed something like that on the people and found out I had contributed to many extra deaths. The devil would have you believe a lie and I believe the word devil is another word for deceiver.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Lol yet another example where you and your source article have perpetuated the misrepresentation/misunderstanding of facts to support your anti vaccine rhetoric.

originally posted by: Axios
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Lol yet another example where you and your source article have perpetuated the misrepresentation/misunderstanding of facts to support your anti vaccine rhetoric.

Are you going to actually provide an argument or just use strawman attacks?

originally posted by: Axios
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Lol yet another example where you and your source article have perpetuated the misrepresentation/misunderstanding of facts to support your anti vaccine rhetoric.

*experimental injections

Let's be honest here and call them what they are
You are literally misrepresenting what they are in your continuous, multi-thread complaint campaign.

From the source...

In June 2022, there were 41,441 deaths registered in England, 3,261 deaths (8.5%) above the June five-year average (2016 to 2019, and 2021); there were 2,740 deaths registered in Wales, 235 deaths (9.4%) above the June average.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) was the 15th leading cause of death in June 2022 in England (accounting for 1.6% of all deaths) and 19th leading cause in Wales (1.4% of all deaths); it was the sixth leading cause for both countries in May 2022.

Deaths involving COVID-19 in the UK reached 200,335 between March 2020 and June 2022.

Looks pretty average to me considering the pandemic which has also caused other issues with hospital appointments and delayed operations, you do seem to like websites that skew the data to match their own opinions....
Li nk to mortality rates from ONS.gov.uk.
The author of the site you linked to didn't tease out any data, i don't know where you get your "facts" from?!?!?
The British government allow access to census data, the spreadsheets are avalible for all to see and use and they have done so for years....
Census data

originally posted by: visitedbythem
Best friend and mentor- 3 weeks-dead
Father in law- 3 day- dead

Gofundme for the funeral?

originally posted by: rickymouse
Boris Johnson and much of his helpers did decide to leave office for no reason

You mean other than the massive political scandal in which the knowingly flouted covid lockdown rules and then lied about it?

Admittedly by US standards this is nothing, but by British standards it is one of the biggest upheavals in UK politics since Cameron lost the brexit referendum.

Plus Johnson personally vouchered for a man who was later proved to be a known sex offender.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The numbers speak for themselves, and although the government makes it difficult to calculate, the author managed to use excel to tease out the data. After denying that they did not hold the information, the ONS quietly published the data about vaccine deaths right as Boris Johnson announced his resignation. I don't claim to be a math whiz, but is 1 death out of every 246 people within a 60 day period normal?

According to the UKHA, 44.48 million people have had a single dose, 41.8 million people have had two doses, and 32.9 million people have had three doses as of July 3rd 2022.

Therefore, using simple maths, we find that 1 in every 246 vaccinated people has died within 60 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England.

44,480,115 (People vaccinated) / 180,659 (deaths) = 246 = 1 death for every 246 people vaccinated

SOURCE

UK Government Source

Average age... 85?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

You know the source article is legit when its author is able to "tease" out damning information from an excel spreadsheet and their website constantly bombards you with donations request because they have only 17 days left to stay alive to fight for freedom.

lul.

And the misuse of statistics continues.

originally posted by: paraphi
And the misuse of statistics continues.

Are you saying that's not a normal number of deaths?

originally posted by: Axios
a reply to: AaarghZombies

You know the source article is legit when its author is able to "tease" out damning information from an excel spreadsheet and their website constantly bombards you with donations request because they have only 17 days left to stay alive to fight for freedom.

lul.

You know you're legit when you provide zero counter argument and use ad homimem.

You're obviously trying to pick and choose the data that suites your agenda, just like the website you linked to does.
If people don't read the ONS and read the data correctly, you can make little snippets look like anything to the average joe.