It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Quadrivium
I did not "invent a phrase".
originally posted by: Quadrivium
the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Seems you wanted to equate a correct description with legaleeze. Law does not dictate scientific fact.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Why?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Quadrivium
the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
So abortion is lawful premeditated killing of another human being?
You're almost there, you can do it...
Premeditated murder is not legalese, it's codified law.
This conversation again?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Quadrivium
So abortion is not murder then, is it?
You are as lost as last year's Easter Egg.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
"Premeditated murder" is a legal term, is it not? Otherwise known colloquially as "legaleeze."
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Yes, the other thread didn't yield an explanation from you.
originally posted by: Quadrivium
Abortion is the premeditated killing of another human being.
Legalese is the disclaimer read at the end of a drug commercial, codified law is not legalese, it's the law.
maybe you should reread it.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Just because you want to define a colloquial term one way, it does not follow that I have to as well.
NOUN
INFORMAL
the formal and technical language of legal documents that is often hard to understand:
"the typed pages were full of confusing legalese"
originally posted by: TheRedneck
why is a slave entitled to rights but an unborn child is not? What makes them different in that respect?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Quadrivium
Abortion is the premeditated killing of another human being.
Yet not murder, why is that?
The law provided that an enslaver's killing of an enslaved person could not constitute murder because the “premeditated malice” element of murder could not be formed against one’s own property.