It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
originally posted by: TheBadCabbie
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2
What do you think?
3yr Delta....
edit on 2-9-2022 by FlyingFox because: I'm sure there's a good explanation....
Also, mentioned is John G. Trump's close relationship with Professor Robert J. Van de Graaff. A crater on the far side of the moon is named after him. And we still know very little about the inner workings of the COG.
For example, one factor linking Dallas, Watergate, Iran-Contra, and 9/11, has been the involvement in all four deep events of personnel involved in America’s highest-level emergency planning, known since the 1950s as Continuity of Government (COG) planning, or more colloquially inside the Pentagon as “the Doomsday Project.” A few of these actors may have been located at the top, as overseers of the secret COG system. Others – including some I shall talk about today – were located further down in its secret communications network.
I see this planning group as one among many in what I have chosen to call the American deep state, along with agencies like the CIA and NSA, the private groups like Booz Allen Hamilton to which more than half of the US intelligence budget is outsourced,(3) and finally the powerful banks and corporations whose views are well represented in the CIA and NSA. But if only one group among many, the COG planning group is also special, because of its control of and access to a communications channel, not under government control, that can reach deeply into the US social structure. I discuss these matters at some length in my next book, The American Deep State...
COG planning was originally authorized by Truman and Eisenhower as planning for a response to a crippling atomic attack that had decapitated government. In consequence its planning group contemplated extreme measures, including what Alfonso Chardy in 1987 called “suspension of the Constitution.” (4)And yet in Iran-Contra its asset of a secret communications network, developed for the catastrophe of decapitation, was used instead to evade an official embargo on arms sales to Iran that dated back to 1979. My question today is whether the network could have been similarly misused in November 1963.
....
It is certain that the COG emergency network program survived North’s demise, and continued to be secretly developed for decades, at a cost of billions, and overseen by a team including Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. It is relevant that the two men’s presence on the committee spanned three administrations – those of Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton — even though at one point under Clinton neither man held a position inside the U.S. government. Such continuity was essential for a group so secret that few records existed of its activities. And on 9/11 COG plans were officially implemented for the first time, by Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, the two men who had planned them for so many years.(7)
Whether or not they knew about Iran-Contra, Cheney and Rumsfeld were on the COG planning committee at the time of Iran-Contra. There is no such obvious link between COG planning and Watergate, but the involvement of COG personnel in Watergate is nonetheless striking.
...
In the case of the JFK assassination, I wish to focus on two men who functioned as part of the communications network of the Office of Emergency Planning (OEP), the agency renamed in 1968 as the Office of Emergency Preparedness (to which McCord was attached), and renamed again in 1982 as the National Program Office (for which Oliver North was the action officer).(11)
The Hidden Government Group Linking JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra and 9/11 (PD Scott, 2014)
originally posted by: TheBadCabbie
a reply to: cimmerius
On the other hand, I suppose I see your point. That three percent would be a formidable force. That being said, the notion that ten million Americans would get together, create a plan for the overthrow or reset of government, and carry it out without being compromised or otherwise neutralized before doing so, seems unlikely. Not impossible, but very unlikely.
Spontaneous organization would probably happen in the absence of government, or chaotic enough times to require it. These seem more likely scenarios.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: Thoughtful1
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: Guyfriday
Noice connection, Guy!!
(Any relevant junctions to cover D5 and B2/B117?)
originally posted by: Guyfriday
Carnegie Mellon University Government Relations DC Office
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: e0bc1f No.6623 📁
Jan 6 2018 13:04:06 (EST)
THEY Divide.
WE Conquer.
Anticipated – human nature.
Anticipated – interruptions by others.
Matlock meant to become PUBLIC.
THIS IS NOT A GAME.
CM – thank you for IDEN verification.
CM – how can a secure ‘read only’ board be set up whereby the message can be safely delivered?
If a board was created, you verified IDEN, and control was w/ you/us, that would eliminate confusion as to IDEN/AUTH correct?
No mod management – only info dumps.
Fact-finding, archiving, discussion, etc. can then be done on a designated ‘follow up’ board.
Message is all that matters.
THE GREAT AWAKENING.
Time is severely limited.
Q
PITTSBURGH -- Articles that people share on social networks can reveal a lot about those readers, research has shown. But a new Carnegie Mellon University study reverses the proposition, asking the question: What can be learned about an article from the attributes of its readers?
To find out, the CMU researchers, along with colleagues at the University of Washington, analyzed almost 3 million news articles and the public profiles of the people who shared those articles on Twitter. This enabled them to generate a few thousand "badges" that characterized the content of the shared news articles and also could be used to analyze any subsequent article, including those that had never been shared or even read.
"Because these badges are based on the readers' self-described interests, rather than only on the words in each article, we found that the badges provide a consistent, reliable means of representing content," said Khalid El-Arini, a recent Ph.D. graduate of the CMU Computer Science Department. "For instance, while what it means to be 'liberal' changes from month to month, there will always be people who describe themselves as 'liberal' on Twitter, allowing us to produce a direct correspondence between 'liberal' topics from different periods of time."
Citizens For Sanity has released a new national ad “STOP THE SLAUGHTER!” It’s about woke leftist politicians transforming our cities into a hell of violence and death.
Citizens for Sanity